Mark Zuckerberg is betting that the slab of glass in your pocket is living on borrowed time. In his view, the next decade will replace the smartphone with a layer of computing that sits on your face, wraps around your body and, eventually, plugs straight into your brain. If he is right, the question is no longer whether phones will fade, but how quickly we are willing to trade them for something far more intimate.
I see his prediction less as a wild guess and more as a roadmap for where the biggest platforms intend to push us. The hardware is still clunky and the software is unfinished, but the direction is clear: by around 2030, Zuckerberg expects traditional mobile phones to feel as dated as a flip phone does today, eclipsed by smart glasses, wearables and neural interfaces that make the idea of “checking your phone” feel quaint.
Zuckerberg’s 10‑year deadline for the smartphone era
When Mark Zuckerberg talks about the end of the smartphone, he is not just musing about the distant future, he is putting a rough expiration date on the device that has dominated consumer tech for nearly two decades. His core claim is stark: the tech landscape is on the brink of a shift in which immersive, wearable computing will overtake the handheld screen, and by around 2030 that shift will render the traditional mobile phone obsolete as our primary interface. In other words, he is arguing that the phone will not disappear entirely, but it will lose its central role in daily life to a new class of devices built around augmented reality and constant connectivity, a view that aligns with forecasts that by 2030, traditional mobile phones will be obsolete.
As I read it, this is less about picking a specific year and more about forcing the industry to imagine a world where the phone is no longer the default gateway to the internet. Setting a 10‑year horizon creates urgency for developers, investors and regulators who might otherwise treat augmented reality as a side project. It also signals that Meta is prepared to spend heavily on hardware and infrastructure that may not pay off until the end of this decade, because Zuckerberg believes the payoff will be a computing platform as transformative as the original iPhone, only this time built around your senses instead of your fingertips.
Smart glasses as the heir to the smartphone
Zuckerberg’s preferred replacement for the smartphone is not a watch or a headset, but a pair of smart glasses that look close enough to Ray‑Ban Wayfarers that you forget you are wearing a computer. His argument is that the most natural way to interact with digital content is to see it in your field of view and hear it in your ears, without constantly reaching for a device or staring down at a screen. In his telling, smart glasses will eventually handle the core jobs of a phone, from messaging and navigation to photography and media playback, while freeing your hands and eyes to stay engaged with the physical world, a vision he has laid out in detail when explaining why smart glasses will replace smartphones.
In practice, that means glasses that can project notifications into the corner of your vision, translate signs on the street, overlay directions on the sidewalk and let you capture photos or video with a subtle voice command. I see this as an attempt to solve one of the smartphone’s biggest social problems, the way it pulls your attention away from the people and places around you. If smart glasses can surface the same information without forcing you to look down, they could make digital life feel less isolating, even as they deepen our dependence on constant connectivity.
Meta’s Ray‑Ban bet and the race to own your face
Meta’s partnership with Ray‑Ban is the clearest sign that Zuckerberg is serious about turning this vision into a mass‑market product rather than a niche gadget. By embedding cameras, microphones and speakers into familiar Ray‑Ban frames, Meta is trying to make the next generation of wearable tech feel like a fashion accessory first and a computer second. Zuckerberg has described these Ray‑Ban smart glasses as a stepping stone toward a future where the glasses are powerful enough to take over most of the functions of a smartphone, a trajectory that underpins his claim that Meta’s Ray‑Ban smart glasses will replace smartphones.
From my perspective, the Ray‑Ban collaboration is as much about social acceptability as it is about hardware specs. Google Glass faltered in part because it looked like a gadget and signaled “tech experiment” the moment you walked into a room. By contrast, Ray‑Ban frames are already part of streetwear and celebrity culture, which gives Meta a shortcut to normalizing cameras on faces. If Meta can keep iterating on battery life, display quality and on‑device AI while preserving that familiar silhouette, it stands a real chance of making smart glasses feel like a natural upgrade path for people who currently live inside their phones.
How smart glasses change the way we see information
The real power of smart glasses is not just that they move the screen from your hand to your face, but that they can blend digital information directly into your view of the world. Instead of pulling out a phone to check a map, you could see arrows hovering over the street; instead of opening a translation app, you might watch foreign text morph into your native language in real time. Technically, this works by overlaying digital content onto the user’s field of vision so that virtual objects and data appear anchored to physical locations, a capability that allows these devices to overlay digital information directly onto the user’s field of vision.
As I see it, this shift from a separate screen to an integrated overlay is what makes smart glasses more than just a hands‑free phone. It turns computing into a persistent layer that sits on top of reality, guiding your decisions moment by moment. That could be transformative for work, from technicians seeing repair instructions on top of a machine to surgeons viewing patient data without looking away from the operating field. It could also reshape leisure, with sports fans seeing live stats in the stadium or tourists getting historical context as they walk through a city. The battle for your primary screen is really a battle over whether information lives in your pocket or in your line of sight.
From phones to wearables: a deeper integration of communication
Zuckerberg’s 10‑year prediction fits into a broader trend in which communication tools are moving closer to our bodies and, eventually, into our bodies. Instead of a single device that you pick up and put down, the future he is pointing to looks more like a mesh of wearables that surround you with sensors, displays and haptics. Analysts of emerging technology describe a trajectory in which we should, in their words, “Future: Anticipate even deeper integration of communication into our daily lives,” with that integration happening through wearable devices and seamless experiences in augmented reality and virtual reality environments, a direction captured in the call to Future: Anticipate even deeper integration of communication.
In that world, the smartphone looks less like the center of your digital life and more like a legacy hub that ties together glasses, earbuds, watches and other sensors until they can operate fully on their own. I expect that as these wearables gain independent connectivity and on‑device processing, the phone will quietly recede into the background, used mainly for setup, security and edge cases. The psychological shift will be subtle but profound: instead of thinking “I am going online now,” you will simply exist in an environment where the network is always present, responding to your voice, gaze and gestures without the ritual of unlocking a screen.
Brain‑computer interfaces and the 2030 horizon
The most radical part of Zuckerberg’s forecast is not the glasses themselves, but what might come after them. Some technologists expect that by around 2030, wearable computers will be joined by brain‑computer interfaces that let people control digital systems directly with neural signals. One influential prediction puts it bluntly, arguing that, “Just like the iPhone changed our lives in the last decade, I expect that by 2030 we will all be wearing brain computer interfaces,” and that this shift will transform the human experience for the better, a view laid out in the argument that Just like the iPhone changed our lives in the last decade, I expect that by 2030 we will all be wearing brain computer interfaces.
If that timeline holds, the smartphone’s decline will coincide with the rise of devices that bypass screens altogether. From my perspective, this is where Zuckerberg’s 10‑year horizon becomes most provocative. A world of brain‑computer interfaces would make tapping on glass feel as archaic as dialing a rotary phone. It would also raise profound questions about privacy, consent and mental autonomy, because the same systems that let you type with your thoughts could, in theory, read patterns you never intended to share. The race to replace the phone is, in part, a race to define the rules for how close technology is allowed to get to our minds.
Inside Zuckerberg’s technical playbook for a post‑phone world
Behind the big predictions, Zuckerberg has been unusually candid about the technical foundations he thinks are needed for this new era. In a widely shared conversation about Meta’s engineering choices, he walked through how Facebook’s tech stack has evolved to support more immersive experiences, from the early days of PHP to the current focus on AI‑driven, real‑time systems that can power augmented reality. In that interview, Mark Zuckerberg discussed the evolution of Facebook’s tech stack and highlighted the importance of choosing the right programming languages and infrastructure to support applications in the era of augmented reality glasses, a point he made while explaining Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook and its role in the era of augmented reality glasses.
To me, this focus on the stack matters because it shows that Meta is not treating smart glasses as a side gadget bolted onto existing systems. Instead, it is retooling its core platforms to handle continuous sensor data, low‑latency rendering and on‑device AI that can run without a phone doing all the heavy lifting. That kind of investment is expensive and risky, but it is also the kind of groundwork you lay only if you truly believe that, within a decade, the main way people access your services will be through devices they wear rather than phones they hold.
The social, economic and ethical stakes of a world beyond phones
If Zuckerberg is right and we no longer rely on phones as our primary interface in 10 years, the ripple effects will reach far beyond Meta’s balance sheet. Entire industries have grown up around the smartphone, from app stores and mobile advertising to phone case manufacturers and repair shops. A shift to smart glasses and brain‑computer interfaces would reorder that ecosystem, rewarding companies that can build ambient, context‑aware services and punishing those that cling to the old model of rectangular apps and tap‑based interfaces. I expect regulators will also face a new wave of questions, from how to police always‑on cameras in public spaces to how to protect workers whose employers want to monitor their gaze or neural activity.
On a personal level, the end of the phone era could feel both liberating and unsettling. It might free us from the posture of hunching over screens, but it would also make it harder to ever truly disconnect, because the interface would be woven into what we wear and, eventually, how we think. As I weigh Zuckerberg’s 10‑year prediction, I see it less as a countdown to the death of a device and more as a warning that the next platform will be far more intimate than the last. Whether that intimacy feels like empowerment or intrusion will depend on choices we make now, before the glasses and neural bands become as ubiquitous as the smartphones we once thought we could not live without.
More from MorningOverview