Instagram’s latest redesign has landed with a thud, igniting a wave of anger from casual users, creators and brands who feel the app is drifting even further from its photo-sharing roots. The new interface, which reshuffles navigation, elevates short video and inserts more recommended content, is being framed by critics as the moment the platform finally stopped listening to the people who built its culture.
Instead of a subtle refresh, the update has triggered a full-blown revolt, with users describing the experience as confusing, “Horrible for” real connection and impossible to roll back, and with long running frustrations about TikTok-style cloning and algorithmic feeds boiling over into a broader crisis of trust.
The new layout: Reels, DMs and a disappearing post button
The most visible shock for many people opening Instagram this season is the way the core navigation has been rearranged to spotlight short video and private messaging. The familiar posting control that once sat at the heart of the app has been demoted, while the interface now pushes users toward Reels and direct messages as the primary actions, a shift that effectively tells people the platform values entertainment clips and private chats over traditional photo posts. In practical terms, that means users must hunt through menus to share a simple image, while the home screen is dominated by vertical video and message icons that reflect the company’s priorities more than users’ habits.
One breakdown of the redesign spells this out bluntly, noting that people are being told to Say goodbye to the dedicated posting button and accept that You will still be able to post, but only after tapping through a more convoluted path that sits behind the Reels and DMs focus. That same analysis underlines how the redesign is not a cosmetic tweak but a structural reordering of the app’s hierarchy, one that makes it far easier to consume endless video than to contribute to the grid that once defined Instagram’s identity.
Discover Feed and the algorithm’s power grab
Alongside the navigation overhaul, Instagram has quietly expanded the amount of content it chooses for users, rather than the posts people explicitly asked to see. A new feature called Discover Feed now automatically surfaces a wide range of public content by default, inserting videos and photos from accounts users do not follow directly into the main experience. For people who once treated Instagram as a curated scrapbook of friends, family and favorite creators, the sudden flood of unfamiliar posts feels like an algorithmic power grab that sidelines their own choices.
Reporting on the rollout describes how the Discover Feed is designed to mimic the recommendation-heavy models used by platforms like TikTok, with Oct updates pushing more suggested clips and trending content into the spaces that once held familiar posts. That shift helps explain why the backlash has been so intense: users are not just reacting to a new button or color scheme, they are confronting a feed that now feels like a generic entertainment channel rather than a personalized network, curated on their own terms.
From neat squares to vertical rectangles: the grid upheaval
If the navigation changes rewired how people move through the app, the grid update attacked something even more sacred: the look and feel of profiles themselves. For more than a decade, Instagram’s square grid was a visual language in its own right, encouraging photographers, influencers and brands to design their pages as mosaics of carefully cropped images. The decision to shift from squares to vertical rectangles has upended that aesthetic, breaking years of planning and forcing creators to rethink how their work appears at a glance.
Coverage of the change notes that the app’s shift from squares to vertical rectangles has users sounding off in the comments, with one report bluntly stating that Instagram is going through some of its most controversial design changes yet. Another analysis frames the reaction under the banner of Social Media Reacts, asking whether the grid overhaul is an Aesthetic Disaster or a Necessary Evolution, and quoting users who complain that their “perfectly curated feed” has been ruined by the new aspect ratio that stretches and crops their work in unexpected ways. In that piece, Adam Mosseri is cited acknowledging that the shift would not be easy, a rare admission that the company knew it was tampering with something people cared about deeply.
The frustration is not limited to professional creators. Everyday users who spent years aligning colors, borders and themes now find their profiles looking chaotic, with older posts no longer matching the new layout. The sense of betrayal is sharpened by the fact that the grid was one of the few constants in an app that has otherwise changed relentlessly, which is why the Aesthetic Disaster framing resonates so strongly. When Mosseri is quoted in that same context, positioning the move as a Necessary Evolution, it captures the core tension of the moment: Instagram sees a future in full screen vertical video, while users see years of visual storytelling being casually discarded.
“Horrible for connecting with people you know”: the user revolt
Beyond design purists, the loudest criticism is coming from people who feel the app no longer serves its original purpose as a place to keep up with friends. On Reddit, one user posting under the name verybored123456789 summed up the mood by declaring that Instagram is now just an entertainment app, calling it “Horrible for” connecting with people you know and arguing that the platform has gone from its original intention of social sharing to something closer to a passive video feed. That sentiment has been echoed across comment sections and group chats, where users complain that they rarely see posts from close contacts unless they actively search for them.
The same thread captures a broader anxiety that the app’s evolution is not just inconvenient but corrosive to the relationships it once helped sustain. As the home screen fills with recommended clips and Reels from strangers, people report feeling more like anonymous viewers than participants in a community, a shift that aligns with the way the new layout prioritizes algorithmic discovery over chronological updates. The Instagram discussion where that “Horrible for” line appears is full of similar laments, with users trading tips on how to mute Reels, dodge suggested posts and cling to any remaining settings that make the app feel like a social network rather than a streaming service.
“The UI just randomly changed”: confusion and lack of control
What turns irritation into outright anger for many users is the sense that these changes are being forced on them without warning or meaningful choice. Several posts describe opening the app to find that The UI just randomly changed, with navigation buttons moved, feeds split and familiar controls buried under new icons. For people who rely on muscle memory to post, message or check notifications, that kind of overnight shift feels less like an update and more like someone rearranged the furniture in their house while they were sleeping.
In one widely shared complaint, a user calls the redesign “the worst thing they have done in a while” and asks if there is really no way to revert, only to be told that the test layout is being pushed to more and more accounts whether they like it or not. That post, titled with the plea “What is this terrible new UI and how do I change it back?”, captures the helplessness many feel as they scroll through the new interface. The thread’s top comment notes that The UI has been rolled out as a test with no opt out, reinforcing the perception that Instagram is treating its user base as a captive audience for product experiments rather than partners in shaping the platform’s future.
Creators caught in the middle: engagement, Favourites and fractured feeds
For creators and small businesses, the redesign is not just an annoyance, it is a potential threat to their reach and revenue. Several critics argue that trying to separate feeds into different modes, such as a main algorithmic stream and a more controlled view, is unnecessary and confusing for audiences who already struggle to understand why they see certain posts and not others. One detailed critique questions why there is a Favourites feature at all if the app is going to keep pushing recommended content on top, suggesting that the new layout makes it harder, not easier, for fans to keep up with the accounts they care about most.
In that same critique, the author lays out how the split feeds and new navigation can bury posts from smaller creators under a flood of Reels and suggested clips, making it more difficult to build consistent engagement. The post ends with the line “Anyways, that’s my rant,” but the underlying concerns are shared by many who depend on Instagram for their livelihoods. The discussion around Favourites highlights a core contradiction in the redesign: the app is adding more knobs and filters for users to theoretically control their experience, while simultaneously giving the algorithm more power to override those preferences in the name of discovery and growth.
Design tweak or deeper problem? The can of worms
From a distance, it might be tempting to see the latest interface change as just another iteration in a long history of social app redesigns. Yet designers and power users argue that this particular shift exposes a much bigger issue with how Instagram is evolving. By changing its navigation buttons for the first time since 2022 and centering features like Reels and messaging, the platform has opened what one analysis calls a massive can of worms, forcing people to confront unresolved frustrations about everything from harassment controls to the way the algorithm rewards certain types of content.
That critique points out that the new layout does not address the real problems with the platform, such as opaque recommendation systems and the pressure to constantly produce video, but instead rearranges icons in a way that makes those tensions more visible. In that view, the backlash is less about a single design decision and more about accumulated distrust, with users reading the navigation shift as proof that their needs are secondary to growth metrics. The piece on Instagram changing its navigation buttons argues that the company is tinkering at the edges while leaving systemic issues untouched, a pattern that makes each new tweak feel like a provocation rather than an improvement.
History repeating: Mosseri, U-turns and the TikTok question
Part of why the current backlash feels so charged is that users have seen this movie before. When Instagram previously tested a TikTok style revamp that pushed full screen video and more recommendations, the reaction was so negative that the company eventually backed down. At the time, Instagram boss Adam Mosseri told The Verge that the test version of the revamped app would be phased out within weeks, a rare public U-turn that signaled the company had overreached in its attempt to copy a rival’s format.
That history looms large as people assess the new interface, which once again leans heavily into short video and algorithmic discovery. Critics argue that the platform has not fully absorbed the lesson from that earlier experiment, instead returning to similar ideas with slightly different packaging. The memory of Mosseri’s comments to The Verge about phasing out the previous revamp fuels speculation that another climbdown could be possible if the current outcry continues. At the same time, executives have framed risk taking as essential, with Inst leadership previously saying they are glad to take big swings even if some fail, a stance that suggests the company is willing to endure short term anger in pursuit of long term strategic goals.
“Copying TikTok and X”: accusations of unoriginality
Beyond usability complaints, there is a growing sense that Instagram has lost its creative edge by chasing competitors instead of setting its own direction. Users are accusing Meta’s platform of mimicking TikTok and X, pointing to the emphasis on vertical video, the Discover Feed’s endless scroll of recommended clips and the way the new layout foregrounds Reels over static images. For long time fans who remember the app as a place for filtered photos and minimalist design, the current interface feels like a mashup of other services rather than a distinct product.
Those accusations are not just about pride of ownership, they also speak to fatigue with the broader social media ecosystem, where every major platform seems to be converging on the same features. The criticism that Users are accusing Meta of copying TikTok and X taps into a deeper worry that innovation has been replaced by imitation, with Instagram’s once distinctive culture flattened into yet another feed of viral trends and reaction clips. For creators who built their followings on the platform’s original strengths, that sameness makes it harder to stand out and easier to consider moving their energy elsewhere.
Engagement logic: Reels, “People are already engaging” and the algorithm’s bet
From Instagram’s perspective, the redesign is not a whim but a response to hard data about how people actually use the app. Internal metrics show that Reels already command a significant share of attention, and executives have argued that aligning the interface with those habits is simply good product design. One analysis of the company’s strategy notes that, in reality, probably not a heap will change for overall engagement because People are already engaging with Reels far more than with static posts, and the main feed experience has been drifting in that direction for some time.
That same breakdown concludes that the updated interface is coming whether users like it or not, framing the test as a step toward a future where short video and private messaging dominate the platform. The argument is that resistance will fade as people adapt, just as they did with Stories and other past changes. Yet the insistence that the new UI is inevitable, captured in the line that it is coming regardless of sentiment, has only hardened opposition among those who feel ignored. The analysis on Well over People engaging with Reels underscores the cold logic driving the redesign: if the numbers say video wins, the interface will be reshaped to serve that outcome, even if it alienates users who came for something else.
Global backlash and the risk of another rollback
As the new layout spreads, the criticism is no longer confined to niche forums or design blogs. Reports describe a global backlash, with users across regions complaining about the Discover Feed, the grid changes and the navigation overhaul in multiple languages and cultural contexts. The anger is particularly sharp among those who feel blindsided by the update, with some calling it the worst change in years and others threatening to delete the app altogether if there is no option to revert.
That level of pushback raises the question of whether Instagram might once again roll back some of its changes in response to user pressure. In a previous controversy, the company did exactly that, scaling back a TikTok style feed after high profile criticism and widespread dissatisfaction. At the time, Inst leadership framed the reversal as part of a willingness to experiment and learn, with one executive saying they were glad to have taken a risk even if it did not land. The memory of that episode, documented in coverage of how Inst rolled back some changes to the app, suggests that another partial retreat is possible if the current outcry continues to grow. At the same time, the company’s repeated return to similar ideas hints that any rollback would likely be temporary, a pause rather than a permanent course correction.
Where users go from here
For now, most people are stuck in a familiar cycle: complain loudly, adapt grudgingly and hope that the next update restores at least some of what was lost. Some are turning to tutorials and explainers to make sense of the new layout, including videos that walk through the updated navigation bar and show where key controls have moved. One such guide notes that Instagram has recently introduced a new navigation bar that changes the controls users were accustomed to, with the walkthrough emphasizing how Reels creation and Messenger style messaging are now central to the experience.
Others are trying to understand the deeper logic behind the redesign, watching breakdowns that explain how the new layout affects engagement and visibility. In one widely shared Reel, a creator argues that the update means less and less people are engaging in public areas like comment sections, as the interface nudges them toward private interactions and passive scrolling instead. That video, which dissects the implications of the change for community building and discovery, has become a reference point for those trying to articulate why the update feels so unsettling. Between the navigation explainer on Oct and the engagement analysis in Nov, a picture emerges of an app that is consciously steering people away from public, chronological sharing and toward a more controlled, entertainment driven environment.
More from MorningOverview