Modern human faces are surprisingly delicate compared with the jutting jaws and broad noses of our closest extinct cousins. The contrast is not just cosmetic, it reflects deep differences in growth, genetics and lifestyle that shaped how our species communicates, eats and survives. I want to trace how those forces sculpted a flatter, smaller face in us while Neanderthals kept the dramatic profiles that still stare back from museum displays.
What emerges from recent research is a story of two closely related humans that took different developmental paths. Neanderthals kept building bone into their faces well into adolescence, while our own growth patterns, genes and cultural innovations pushed the midface inward and the jaw back. The result is a modern human face that is less about brute force and more about fine control, expression and social signaling.
The stark facial contrast between humans and Neanderthals
When I compare a modern skull with a Neanderthal one, the first impression is how much more our relatives’ faces project. Neanderthals carried stout jaws and broad noses, their midfaces jutting forward like a ledge of bone, in sharp contrast to the tucked-in profile of most people alive today. Reconstructions based on fossil skulls show that this projection was not a minor tweak but a defining feature of their appearance, especially around the nose, cheekbones and upper jaw, which formed a powerful, forward-thrusting block of bone.
That difference stands out even more when I set Neanderthals alongside chimpanzees, which also have protruding jaws and heavy brow ridges. Modern humans sit at the other end of this spectrum, with a relatively flat midface, a smaller jaw and a chin that pulls the lower face inward. Analyses that compare the three lineages find that Neanderthals, in particular, showed strong forward growth in the midface region, while our species shifted toward retraction and reduction.
How Neanderthal faces kept growing into adulthood
One of the most striking findings from recent work is that Neanderthal faces did not stop changing at puberty the way ours largely do. Thanks to high resolution imaging of fossil skulls, researchers have shown that bone continued to be added to the front of the Neanderthal face through the teenage years and into early adulthood. I see this as a key reason their faces remained so large and prominent, because the growth machinery stayed switched on for longer, especially around the nose and upper jaw.
In contrast, facial growth in Homo sapiens slows dramatically once adolescence ends, which helps explain why our faces are smaller and less projecting. Studies that reconstruct growth trajectories from childhood to adulthood show that Thanks to modern technology, scientists can now see that Neanderthals kept depositing bone where we start to balance addition with removal. This prolonged growth fits with the idea that their faces were adapted for powerful biting and heavy breathing in demanding environments, while ours shifted toward a more compact, energy efficient structure.
Different midfacial growth patterns in modern humans
To understand why our faces ended up flatter, I look at how the midface grows rather than just its final shape. Using geometric morphometrics, researchers have tracked how the bones of the nose, cheeks and upper jaw change through childhood in present day humans and Neanderthals. The pattern that emerges is that our midfaces do not simply grow less, they grow differently, with more emphasis on remodeling that pulls the face inward instead of building it outward.
In practical terms, that means bone is often removed from the front of the human midface while it is added at the back, which gradually tucks the face under the braincase. This contrasts with Neanderthals, where bone deposition dominates at the front, preserving a large, projecting midface. A detailed comparison of these trajectories shows that Using geometric morphometrics, scientists can quantify how our midfacial growth pattern diverges from the one that produced the large Neanderthal midface, and that divergence is central to the modern human look.
Bite force, climate and the functional face
Any face is also a tool, and Neanderthal anatomy reflects the jobs theirs had to do. Existing theories argue that their large facial structure supported a stronger bite, which would have helped them process tough, uncooked foods and handle the mechanical stress of using their teeth as a kind of third hand. I find that idea persuasive when I look at the robust jaws and wide nasal openings that could also have warmed and humidified cold air during intense physical activity.
Biomechanical modeling backs up the notion that Neanderthal faces were built for force. Simulations of chewing and biting suggest that their midfaces could distribute high loads without failing, while our smaller jaws and flatter faces are optimized for more modest forces and finer control. One study that tested these ideas used digital reconstructions to show how Existing theories about Neanderthal bite strength fit with a lifestyle that involved chasing and hunting large animals in harsh climates, where a powerful, projecting face was an asset rather than a liability.
Bone deposition, resorption and the mechanics of a flat face
Underneath these visible differences lies a quiet tug of war between bone being added and bone being taken away. In Neanderthals, bone deposits continued across the front of the face through the teenage years, steadily building out the midface and jaw. In modern humans, that same period is marked by a more balanced pattern, where bone removal at the front counteracts deposition, which gradually flattens the profile.
This contrast is not just inferred, it is visible in microscopic traces on fossil bones that record where cells once laid down or removed tissue. Researchers have described how While in Neanderthals bone deposits continue through adolescence, in our species there is more bone removal, especially around the nose and upper jaw, resulting in a flatter face. I see this as a fundamental developmental switch that separates our facial architecture from theirs, even when the underlying skull size is similar.
Genetic switches and the “dark genome” behind facial shape
Genes do not just build bones, they choreograph when and where those bones grow, and new work is finally tying specific genetic changes to the Neanderthal–human facial split. Researchers have begun to identify gene regulatory variants that influence jaw size, midface projection and nasal shape, many of them sitting in stretches of DNA that do not code for proteins but control how other genes turn on and off. These subtle switches can have outsized effects on the timing of bone deposition and resorption during childhood.
Some of the most intriguing candidates lie in what scientists call the “dark genome”, regions that were once poorly understood but now appear to regulate craniofacial development. Analyses of ancient DNA suggest that differences in these regulatory elements helped produce the beefy jaws of Neanderthals and the smaller, retracted faces of Homo sapiens. One recent report linked variants in these regions to changes in jaw robustness, noting that Researchers have identified gene regulatory variants that may have contributed to Neanderthals’ beefy jaws, while another highlighted how Nov research into the dark genome is clarifying why Neanderthal faces looked so different from those of Homo sapiens.
Neanderthal DNA still shaping modern human faces
Even though Neanderthals disappeared long ago, fragments of their DNA live on in many people today, and some of those fragments still influence how our faces form. When I look at genetic studies of living humans, I see that certain inherited Neanderthal variants are associated with subtle changes in nose width, jaw angle and midface height. These are not dramatic transformations, but they show that the ancient blueprint still leaves a faint imprint on modern profiles.
Researchers have traced some of these effects to regulatory regions that affect genes involved in cartilage and bone formation, including those that shape the nose and upper jaw. One analysis found that large deletions or rearrangements in these regions can have strong effects on facial structure, and that Neanderthal derived segments sometimes tweak the same pathways. A report on this work noted that Every face carries a story shaped by genes, including Neanderthal DNA that still nudges the structure of the modern human face.
What fossils reveal about Neanderthal facial anatomy
Fossil skulls remain the most direct window into how Neanderthals looked, and they consistently show a suite of features that differ from ours. Neanderthals had low, elongated skulls with heavy brow ridges, a very big, wide nose and a midface that projected forward beneath the eyes. Their cheekbones angled differently from ours, and the area around the sinuses and nasal cavity formed a large, complex space that likely affected how they breathed and spoke.
Descriptions from museum collections emphasize that Neanderthals were humans like us, but they belonged to a distinct species called Homo neanderthalensis, with bodies and faces adapted to Ice Age Europe and western Asia. One overview notes that Our closest ancient human relatives, Neanderthals, had a very big, wide nose and a robust face, while another report on a Dec study of Neanderthals’ distinctive face shape used the Devil’s Tower specimen to explore how their facial anatomy differed from ours. Together, these fossils anchor the genetic and developmental stories in real, three dimensional bone.
Facial ontogeny: how growth paths diverged
To move beyond static skulls, I look at facial ontogeny, the way shape changes from infancy to adulthood. In Neanderthals, mandibular ontogeny manifests as continued forward growth of the jaw, with the chin area remaining receding rather than jutting out. Their upper faces also keep expanding outward, so that by adulthood the entire midface projects more than in any modern human population. This growth path reinforces the robust, powerful look that we associate with Neanderthals.
Modern humans follow a different ontogenetic route. Our jaws rotate and retract slightly as we grow, and the chin becomes more prominent even as the overall lower face becomes smaller relative to the braincase. A detailed comparative study concluded that In Neanderthals, mandibular ontogeny manifests in a way that differs fundamentally from Homo sapiens, and that a simple scaling up or down of one pattern to explain the other is rejected. I see this as evidence that our flatter faces are not just smaller versions of a Neanderthal face, but the result of a distinct developmental program.
Culture, tools and the shrinking human face
Biology does not operate in a vacuum, and cultural shifts likely fed back into how our faces evolved. As Homo sapiens developed tools to cook and process food, the mechanical demands on the jaw and teeth decreased. Softer diets reduce the need for massive chewing muscles and thick jaws, which in turn can relax the selective pressure for a large, projecting face. Over generations, this can favor individuals with smaller jaws and flatter faces without compromising survival.
Anthropologists have pointed out that a lot of human face shape is due to a decrease in jaw size, and they link that decrease to the rise of cooking, grinding and other food technologies. One discussion of this idea notes that Feb commentary on why humans evolved flat faces highlights how Neanderthals adapted to live in colder climates with different dietary pressures, while our species leaned into tools and culture that defined our facial evolution. I see this cultural buffering as one reason our faces could become smaller and more expressive without sacrificing function.
Why modern faces stop growing earlier
Another crucial piece of the puzzle is timing. Facial growth in Homo sapiens tends to stop around puberty, which locks in a relatively small, compact face compared with Neanderthals. This early halt means that even if childhood growth patterns were similar, the extra years of bone deposition that Neanderthals experienced would still produce a much larger face by adulthood. Our species, by contrast, caps facial growth while the skull is still relatively gracile.
Researchers studying this pattern have argued that humans differ from chimpanzees and Neanderthals in how their faces grow, not just how big they get. One analysis put it bluntly, stating that Facial growth stops at puberty in Homo sapiens, and that humans evolved as distinct and separate from Neanderthals in part because of this altered growth schedule. I see this early stop as a developmental constraint that helped cement the modern human face as smaller, flatter and more childlike in some respects than that of our extinct cousins.
What our faces say about being human
When I pull these threads together, the modern human face looks less like an accident and more like a composite of many small shifts. Changes in bone remodeling, growth timing and gene regulation nudged the midface inward and the jaw back. Cultural innovations reduced the need for brute chewing power, while social life may have favored faces that could convey subtle emotions and speech sounds. The result is a profile that is less about surviving cold winds and raw meat, and more about navigating dense social networks.
Neanderthals, for their part, carried faces that were perfectly suited to their own world, with big noses, stout jaws and projecting midfaces that matched their bodies and environments. Studies of Dec research into Neanderthals’ distinctive face shape and the growth patterns that sustained it show that their appearance was the product of a coherent evolutionary strategy, not a primitive leftover. In the end, the difference between their faces and ours is a reminder that there was more than one way to be human, and that our own flat, expressive faces are just one branch of a much richer story.
More from MorningOverview