For nearly a century, astronomers have watched galaxies spin and the universe expand in ways that visible matter alone cannot explain. The dominant answer has been dark matter, an unseen substance that outweighs ordinary atoms and quietly sculpts cosmic structure. Now a cluster of radical ideas about gravity itself is challenging that picture, arguing that the strange motions we see might come not from invisible particles but from gravity behaving in unexpected ways.
Instead of adding new ingredients to the universe, these theories tinker with the rules, suggesting that gravity can emerge from deeper physics, fluctuate with spacetime, or even exist without mass. If any of them survive the next decade of scrutiny, they would not just solve a long standing puzzle, they would rewrite what I think the word “gravity” means.
Why dark matter became the default explanation
Before weighing alternatives, it is worth recalling why dark matter became such a central pillar of modern cosmology. When astronomers map how stars orbit within galaxies and how galaxies move inside clusters, the visible gas and stars do not provide enough pull to keep everything bound. To reconcile the motions with Einstein’s equations, researchers infer a vast halo of unseen material, and Scientific evidence from galaxy rotation, gravitational lensing, and the cosmic microwave background all point to some additional component that interacts very weakly with light. On this view, dark matter is a new type of fundamental particle or family of particles that threads through and around galaxies, shaping their evolution from the earliest times.
That particle picture has driven decades of experiments, from underground detectors to the Large Hadron Collider, yet no one has conclusively caught a dark matter particle in the act. The Department of Energy describes how these hypothetical particles would interact only through gravity and perhaps the weak nuclear force, making them extremely hard to spot, but still treats them as the leading explanation for the missing mass problem in galaxies and clusters. The sheer breadth of phenomena that fit neatly once dark matter is added, from the growth of large scale structure to subtle temperature ripples in the early universe, explains why the idea remains dominant even as more speculative gravitational alternatives gain attention.
Gravity that changes over time and space
One of the boldest challenges to the dark matter paradigm comes from the suggestion that gravity itself might not be constant across cosmic history. In a recent proposal, Oct and other Researchers argue that if the fundamental forces of nature gradually weaken as the universe ages, then the motions of stars and galaxies could appear to demand extra mass even when none is present. In this picture, the illusion of missing matter arises because astronomers are applying today’s strength of gravity to systems that formed when the rules were slightly different, so the apparent “extra” pull is really a bookkeeping error in time. The idea directly targets the long standing mystery of why the outer regions of galaxies are moving faster than expected, reframing it as a sign that gravity’s grip has evolved rather than evidence for a hidden halo.
This time varying gravity scenario explicitly challenges decades of thinking by suggesting that the cosmic acceleration and anomalous galaxy rotation curves might both be side effects of changing forces rather than new substances. The argument is that as the universe expands and cools, the effective couplings of the fundamental interactions drift, subtly altering how matter responds to spacetime curvature. Advocates of this view point to the way quantum field theories already allow coupling constants to “run” with energy scale, and extend that logic to cosmological time, proposing that a similar running could mimic the influence of dark matter on large scales. The proposal from Oct and the other Researchers, shared in a widely discussed theory, insists that what looks like extra gravity in galaxy outskirts could instead be a sign that the underlying constants have shifted since those systems formed.
Emergent gravity and spacetime fluctuations
Another radical line of thought treats gravity not as a fundamental force at all, but as an emergent phenomenon that arises from deeper microscopic degrees of freedom. In this view, which has been developed in several forms, spacetime behaves like a kind of elastic medium whose large scale curvature reflects the statistical behavior of underlying quantum information. A Nov report on one such “Emergent” gravity framework describes how the theory predicts specific deviations from Newtonian expectations in the outskirts of galaxies, deviations that closely resemble the effects usually attributed to dark matter. Instead of adding invisible particles, the extra pull comes from the way information about matter is encoded in the very structure of spacetime, producing an additional, entropy related contribution to gravity on large scales.
Closely related ideas push this further, proposing that small scale fluctuations in spacetime itself could drive the odd motions of stars without any dark component. A Dec summary of a new theoretical approach describes how random variations in the geometry of spacetime might accumulate over galactic distances, subtly altering orbits and mimicking the gravitational signature of a massive halo. In that picture, dark energy and dark matter both become emergent effects of the same underlying quantum foam, with the accelerated expansion and flat rotation curves arising from how spacetime responds to its own fluctuations. I find this class of models especially striking because it suggests that the universe’s most puzzling components could be bookkeeping artifacts of a deeper, more granular fabric of reality.
When gravity exists without mass
Perhaps the most counterintuitive proposal in this landscape is the claim that gravity can exist without mass at all. A Jun report on a New theory argues that the familiar link between mass and gravity might be only part of the story, and that certain configurations of fields or spacetime could generate gravitational effects even in the absence of conventional matter. In this framework, the “Dark” component inferred from galaxy dynamics is not a cloud of particles but a manifestation of geometry or energy that does not show up in ordinary mass inventories. One of the striking claims is that this approach can reproduce the observed rotation curves of galaxies and the behavior of clusters without invoking any new particle species, effectively dissolving the dark matter dilemma into a redefinition of what counts as a source of gravity.
Other theorists have tried to systematize such departures from Newton and Einstein into modified gravity laws that kick in at very low accelerations. The family of ideas known as MOND, for Modified Newtonian Dynamics, adjusts the force law so that gravity falls off more slowly in the weak field regime, which naturally boosts the speeds of stars in the outskirts of galaxies. A detailed analysis of MOND’s performance in the outer solar system, focusing on Kuiper Belt Objects, finds that the theory can match the observed orbits as well as the proposed Planet Nine hypothesis, leading one researcher to say “But I believe in the analysis we did” while still urging colleagues to remain agnostic. That kind of careful comparison underscores how modified gravity can sometimes compete head to head with dark matter based explanations, at least on certain scales.
From entropic forces to Webb era tests
Some of the most developed alternatives to dark matter fall under the banner of entropic or emergent gravity, which recast the familiar inverse square law as a kind of thermodynamic effect. In one influential version, gravity arises from changes in the information content associated with the positions of material bodies, so that what we perceive as a force is really a tendency of systems to move toward states with higher entropy. A Nov overview of this entropic gravity program notes that it predicts the same deviations in galaxy rotation rates that are currently attributed to dark matter, and even offers an alternative account of the cosmic acceleration usually ascribed to dark energy. In that sense, it is one of the few frameworks that tries to eliminate both dark components in a single stroke, replacing them with a new understanding of how spacetime and information interact.
More from Morning Overview