President Trump has sharpened a familiar argument in the energy debate, claiming that Democratic-leaning states pay more for electricity and get less reliable service in return. The political contrast is stark, but the underlying question is more practical than partisan: are blue states really paying a premium for weaker power, or is the story more complicated once I look at the data on prices, incomes, and reliability?
Across the country, electricity costs have been rising, and families in both red and blue states are feeling the strain on their monthly bills. When I line up state-by-state price data, partisan voting patterns, and research on grid performance, a pattern does emerge, but it is tangled up with geography, income, and policy choices that do not map neatly onto campaign talking points.
What the price data actually show
On the narrow question of price per kilowatt-hour, the numbers do give Trump part of what he wants. Federal statistics on electricity sales show wide variation by state, and multiple independent analyses find that states that vote Democratic in national elections tend to sit toward the top of the price table. One review of all-sector rates from January through August 2025, summarized in Figure 1 of that research, groups states by how they voted in the last two presidential contests and finds that the blue category consistently pays more per kilowatt-hour than the red category.
A separate consumer-focused analysis of residential bills reaches a similar conclusion, reporting in its Key Takeaways that 9 of the top 10 most expensive states for electricity were blue states. That same review calculates that, on average, blue states pay 37% more than red states for electricity, a figure that has quickly become a talking point in conservative circles. When I cross-check those findings against the federal breakdown of Average revenue per kilowatt-hour by state, the broad pattern of higher prices in coastal, Democratic-leaning states and lower prices in many interior, Republican-leaning states holds up.
Blue states at the top of the price table
Looking at individual examples, the extremes of the price spectrum are dominated by states that typically vote Democratic. Island grids like Hawaii, which relies heavily on imported fuel and has limited interconnections, routinely show up as the most expensive places in the country to power a home or business. Large, urbanized states such as California and Massachusetts also sit near the top of the price rankings, reflecting a mix of higher labor costs, dense infrastructure, and aggressive clean energy mandates that require utilities to invest in new generation and transmission.
Policy-focused researchers have seized on that pattern. One detailed review of state-level rates argues that Americans pay dramatically different electric bills depending on which party controls their state capitol, and frames high prices in many Democratic-led states as a deliberate political choice to prioritize rapid decarbonization. A companion analysis on Energy affordability, drawing on a poll conducted by Ipsos, underscores that energy costs have become a top concern for American households, particularly in high-price states that have moved fastest toward renewable portfolios.
Red states with bargain power
On the other end of the spectrum, some of the cheapest power in the country is found in Republican-leaning states with abundant fossil fuel resources. Consumer rate trackers list Top 10 states with the cheapest residential electricity, and Louisiana consistently pays the lowest residential electricity rates in the nation. Other low-cost states include hydro-rich Idaho, coal and wind heavy North Dakota, and fast-growing Texas, where a competitive wholesale market and a large base of natural gas and wind generation help keep average rates relatively low.
Advocates for an expansive fossil fuel strategy argue that this is not a coincidence. A report highlighted by regional media notes that rural, conservative states lead the nation in Power Grid Reliability by embracing an All of the Above energy strategy, with gas and nuclear heavy Arizona singled out as one example. Another summary of state-level prices points out that States with the lowest electricity prices are often those that have not moved as aggressively to retire coal or gas plants, reinforcing the political narrative that Republican regions are keeping power cheap by keeping traditional fuels online.
Reliability, shutoffs and what “weaker power” really means
Trump’s claim, however, is not just about price, it is about reliability, and here the picture is more nuanced. A recent fact-check of his remarks notes that while electricity costs are climbing nearly everywhere in the United States, some red states do have fewer outages than many of their blue counterparts, but the differences are shaped by weather, geography, and infrastructure as much as by party control. That analysis, illustrated with an image credited to Noah Berger for via Reuters and CNN Newsource, stresses that outages in places like California are often tied to wildfire prevention shutoffs and extreme heat, not simply to partisan energy policy.
Reliability also has a financial dimension that does not always track with outage statistics. A report from New York City documents a surge in power shutoffs as unpaid bills pile up, with residential disconnections in August up fivefold from a year earlier and the problem spilling into the middle class. That trend is not confined to blue states, but it underscores how rising rates and stagnant wages can make electricity feel unreliable in a different way, as families face the risk of losing service altogether when they cannot keep up with payments.
Income, policy tradeoffs and who can afford higher rates
To judge whether blue states are getting a worse deal, I also have to look at incomes and what residents receive in return for higher rates. A detailed visualization of state incomes finds that Blue States Generally, with many Democratic-leaning states posting household incomes over 100,000 dollars per year. That means a higher price per kilowatt-hour in a place like Washington state or Massachusetts may consume a smaller share of the typical household budget than a lower nominal rate in a poorer red state, even if the bill is larger on paper.
At the same time, there is evidence that electricity costs are rising under President Trump in ways that cut across party lines. A report from WASHINGTON by Joint Economic Committee Minority estimates that annual electricity bills are up 100 dollars per family under his administration, a national average that includes both red and blue states. Another analysis of partisan fiscal flows notes that One of the ironies of the political dynamic is that the Republican philosophy of lower taxes and spending often coincides with red states receiving net fiscal transfers from higher income blue states, complicating any simple story about who subsidizes whose energy choices.
More from Morning Overview