Toyota is not trying to beat Tesla at its own game so much as rewrite the rules around it. By pairing a budget-friendly electric model often framed around a $22,500 price point with access to Tesla’s Supercharger network, the company is turning a long‑running “Tesla killer” narrative into something more subtle and more dangerous for its rivals. Instead of building a rival charging empire, Toyota is hijacking the one that already works and using it as a springboard for mass‑market adoption.
I see this as a strategic shortcut: let Tesla spend the capital to normalize fast charging, then flood that same infrastructure with cheaper, familiar Toyotas. The result is a new phase of the EV race in which charging standards, not just batteries and software, decide who wins the next wave of buyers.
The $22,500 shock and the myth of the Tesla killer
The phrase “$22,500 Tesla killer” captures the anxiety around a low‑cost Toyota EV that can undercut Tesla on price while piggybacking on its charging network. Coverage of the $22,500 target frames this car as a “Tesla eater,” a compact EV priced to feel more like a mainstream Corolla than a tech toy. By putting that number front and center, Toyota is signaling that the next phase of the EV market will be fought over affordability and convenience, not just acceleration times or over‑the‑air updates.
At the same time, the “Tesla killer” label has always been more marketing myth than market reality. One widely shared discussion of the “legend of the ‘Tesla killer’” notes that the only company that has consistently disrupted Tesla is Tesla itself, from controversial design choices like the yoke‑style steering wheel on the Model S and Model X to aggressive price cuts that reset expectations across the segment. In that context, Toyota’s move is less about slaying a rival and more about exploiting the infrastructure that rival built.
Why Toyota grabbed NACS instead of building its own network
Rather than pouring billions into a parallel charging ecosystem, Toyota has chosen to adopt Tesla’s North American Charging Standard, or NACS, for its battery electric vehicles. Toyota Motor North America, Inc has formally agreed with Tesla to put NACS ports on future models, effectively conceding that the Supercharger plug has become the de facto standard in North America. From a business perspective, this is a classic Toyota move: avoid the sunk costs of infrastructure, focus on manufacturing scale, and let someone else shoulder the burden of building thousands of fast chargers.
The company is already telling customers that, NACS Charging Adapter, Toyota BEV drivers will gain access to a rapidly expanding NACS DC Fast Charging network that includes Tesla Superchargers. That language is revealing. Toyota is not promising to fix public charging itself, it is promising to unlock what already exists and make “road trips easier than ever” for people who might otherwise hesitate to go electric. In other words, the company is selling peace of mind as much as it is selling kilowatt‑hours.
How hijacking Superchargers changes the EV sales pitch
By plugging into Superchargers, Toyota can tell buyers that the hardest part of EV ownership has already been solved. The company’s own charging explainer emphasizes that NACS Charging Adapter, a Toyota BEV can tap into NACS Fast Charging locations that drivers already recognize from highway exits and shopping centers. For a hesitant buyer, the combination of a familiar badge, a relatively low sticker price, and the promise of easy fast charging removes three of the biggest psychological barriers in one stroke.
This is why the $22,500 positioning matters so much. Reporting that frames the car as a $22,500 “Tesla eater” underscores that Toyota is aiming squarely at buyers who might otherwise default to a gasoline compact. When those shoppers learn that the same car can use the Supercharger stalls they see packed with Teslas on busy weekends, the EV leap starts to feel less like a gamble and more like an upgrade.
NACS as the new default, and Toyota’s timing
Toyota’s embrace of NACS did not happen in a vacuum. A growing list of automakers has lined up behind the standard, and commentary around Toyota and Lexus Are Going NACS, No Question Now, This Is The New Charging Standard, Episode 160, reflects a broader industry consensus that the plug war is effectively over. By waiting until NACS had clear momentum, Toyota Motor North America, Inc avoided the risk of backing a losing standard while still arriving early enough to shape how its own customers experience the network.
In practical terms, that means future Toyota BEVs will ship with NACS ports rather than relying indefinitely on adapters. The company’s agreement with NACS positions its lineup to feel native on the Supercharger network instead of like second‑class citizens. For drivers, the difference is subtle but important: fewer cables, fewer compatibility questions, and a sense that their car is part of the mainstream rather than an afterthought.
The $17,999 bombshell and the price war Tesla did not want
If the $22,500 EV is the headline, the deeper threat to Tesla may be Toyota’s willingness to push prices even lower. One widely circulated video describes how Tesla has dominated the EV conversation for years, only to face a “$17999 Bombshell” from Toyota that could reset expectations for entry‑level electric cars. Another clip, shared under the banner EV Industry SHAKING After TOYOTA’s $17999 Bombshell, frames this as a quiet but seismic shift: a legacy automaker using its scale to drag EV pricing down to levels that feel more like subcompact gasoline cars than premium tech products.
For Tesla, which has already cut prices repeatedly to defend its market share, this is the kind of competition it would prefer to delay. The same discussion of the “Tesla killer” legend that highlighted the yoke steering wheel on the There thread also raised questions about how far Tesla can keep lowering prices without eroding its margins or brand. Toyota, by contrast, is used to making money on thin margins at huge volume. If it can sell a $22,500 or even $17,999 EV that charges on Superchargers, it forces Tesla to compete on the unglamorous terrain of cost discipline and manufacturing efficiency rather than software features alone.
More from Morning Overview