Autonomous vehicles are finally good enough to glide through city streets, but they still fall apart in the messy reality of curbside chaos, from Chick-fil-A drive-thrus to airport pickup lanes. A new startup is betting that the missing piece is not smarter cars, but a kind of “air traffic control” layer that tells those cars exactly how to behave in the most congested private spaces.
Instead of trying to fix public roads, this company is quietly wiring up the parking lots, loading zones, and drive-thru mazes where self-driving fleets already struggle, turning them into highly choreographed environments that robots can actually understand.
The curb is where autonomy breaks
Most self-driving demos focus on the drama of unprotected left turns or highway merges, yet the real breakdowns tend to happen in far less glamorous places like fast-food queues and retail parking lots. Human drivers can improvise when a Chick-fil-A line spills into traffic or when a Costco lot turns into a free-for-all, but a robotaxi that has been trained on clean lane markings and predictable flows often freezes or behaves unpredictably once it hits that curbside entropy. The gap between what autonomy can do on a mapped arterial and what it can handle in a crowded pickup zone is where the business case starts to wobble.
That is the pain point a new startup called Autolane is targeting, by building both physical and digital infrastructure for incoming and outgoing AVs at the places that actually generate trips. Instead of asking a Waymo or Cruise-style vehicle to “figure out” a chaotic parking lot on its own, Autolane wants to pre-structure those environments so that a car arriving for a pickup or drop-off is following a precise script, not improvising in a swarm of SUVs and delivery vans.
Autolane’s “orchestration layer” vision
Autolane’s core idea is that autonomy needs a conductor, not just better soloists. The company is building what its backers describe as an orchestration layer that sits between autonomous vehicles and the physical world, translating messy real estate into machine-readable instructions. In practice, that means a software brain that knows the exact geometry of a Chick-fil-A drive-thru, a Home Depot loading zone, or a hospital entrance, and can assign each arriving vehicle a specific path, waiting spot, and timing window.
In a post on LinkedIn, investor Ben Seidl framed it bluntly, saying They are “building the orchestration layer that sits between autonomous vehicles and the physical world, starting with pickups and dropoffs.” That framing matters, because it shifts the focus from the AV companies themselves to the connective tissue that lets fleets operate at scale in the real world. Instead of yet another driving stack, Autolane is positioning itself as the neutral coordinator that can tell any compatible vehicle where to go, when to move, and how to avoid gridlock in the tightest spaces.
From “air traffic control” to Chick-fil-A drive-thrus
To explain the concept, Autolane’s advocates keep reaching for aviation metaphors. Ben Seidl has argued that as autonomous fleets grow, “someone is going to have to sit in the middle and orchestrate, coordinate, and kind of evaluate what’s going on,” likening the role to an air traffic controller who keeps planes from colliding in crowded skies. Instead of runways and taxiways, the system would manage drive-thru lanes, curb cuts, and loading docks, ensuring that each AV knows exactly when to pull in, where to wait, and how to exit without blocking everyone else.
Seidl has pointed to specific high-friction environments, saying that the same orchestration logic could apply at a Chick-fil-A, a Costco, or a Home Depot, where lines of vehicles routinely spill into surrounding streets and parking aisles. In his telling, the “air traffic control” layer would sit between those properties and the fleets that serve them, turning what is now a free-for-all into a tightly managed flow coordinated by Seidl’s envisioned middleman. For AV operators, that could mean fewer stalled rides and more predictable trip times; for property owners, it promises less congestion and a smoother customer experience.
Why robots need scripted environments
Autolane’s bet rests on a simple but often overlooked reality: robots are far less adaptable than humans in unstructured spaces. A human driver can glance at a frazzled parking attendant, read a hastily placed cone, and intuit that the usual pickup lane has shifted for the dinner rush. A self-driving car, by contrast, needs explicit instructions and precise geolocation data to navigate that same scenario without confusion. The more chaotic the environment, the more brittle a purely vehicle-centric autonomy stack becomes.
That is why Autolane’s pitch leans heavily on the idea that Robotics need “precise instructions and precise geolocation and technological infrastructure” to function reliably. In this view, the problem is not that AVs are inherently flawed, but that we are asking them to improvise in spaces that were never designed for machine navigation. By pre-mapping those spaces and layering in digital rules about where and when vehicles can move, Autolane is trying to turn chaotic lots into semi-structured stages where robots can finally perform.
Physical signage meets digital lanes
Crucially, Autolane is not just a cloud service. The company plans to install simple physical infrastructure like signage and marked zones that tell both humans and robots where AV pickups and drop-offs should occur. If that sounds familiar, it is because ride-hailing companies have already trained riders to look for designated Uber and Lyft signs at airports and stadiums, using basic wayfinding to tame some of the worst curbside congestion. Autolane is effectively taking that playbook and updating it for a world where the vehicles themselves are autonomous and need to follow far more rigid rules.
According to one description of its rollout, Autolane’s deals will include creating “simple, physical infrastructure like signage,” similar to the many kinds of Uber and Lyft pickup markers that have become standard at major venues. The difference is that every cone, sign, and painted line in an Autolane-managed zone is also mirrored in a digital twin that AVs can query in real time. When a robotaxi pulls into a Chick-fil-A lot, it is not just following a GPS pin; it is entering a micro-environment whose rules have been codified down to the individual parking stall.
Staying off public streets, on private property
One of Autolane’s most strategic choices is where it has decided not to operate. The company has been explicit that it does not work on public streets and does not touch public parking spots, focusing instead on private property where owners have far more control over how traffic flows. That constraint is not just a legal nicety; it is a way to sidestep the regulatory thicket that has slowed many AV deployments on city roads, while still solving a problem that matters to both fleets and businesses.
As one of its leaders put it, “We don’t work on public streets. We don’t work with public parking spots. We’re just providing these tools as kind of a layer on top of private property,” a stance that has been highlighted in coverage of the company’s plans for Sep events. By limiting itself to malls, restaurants, big-box retailers, and campuses, Autolane can move faster, cut bespoke deals, and avoid being dragged into citywide fights over curb allocation, even as its software quietly shapes how AVs behave at some of the busiest destinations in town.
Integrating with landlords, not just AV fleets
Autolane’s real leverage comes from the side of the market it is choosing to court. Instead of trying to sell directly into every robotaxi operator or delivery startup, the company is focusing on the landlords and operators who control the physical spaces where those fleets converge. If a major shopping center or quick-service restaurant chain standardizes on Autolane’s system, any AV fleet that wants to serve that property will have a strong incentive to plug into the orchestration layer rather than wing it.
That strategy was spelled out by Ben Seidl, who said that Instead of competing with vehicle makers, the value of Autolane is in how it will integrate with the companies that own real estate as well as with the AV operators that serve them. In his framing, property owners get tools to manage traffic and improve customer throughput, while vehicle companies receive precise instructions about where to stage, how to queue, and when to move. That two-sided integration is what turns Autolane from a niche parking tool into a potential gatekeeper for AV access to high-value destinations.
From personal AV epiphany to WAITLIST NOW
Autolane’s founders are not pitching this as a distant future concept. One of them has described a personal turning point when his own car began driving him around town “pretty much flawlessly,” which made him realize that the bottleneck was no longer the vehicle’s ability to stay in its lane, but the world’s inability to give that vehicle clear instructions in complex environments. Once autonomy crossed a certain threshold of competence, the question shifted from “Can the car drive?” to “Can the car understand what this Chick-fil-A parking lot expects it to do?”
That realization underpins the company’s decision to open a WAITLIST NOW for partners that want to experiment with its “air traffic control” system for autonomous vehicles. The message is that the autonomy case is already strong enough on the open road, but still fragile at the curb. By inviting early adopters to sign up, Autolane is signaling that it sees a near-term commercial opportunity in orchestrating those last fifty meters between the street and the storefront, where the customer experience is won or lost.
Why this matters for robotaxis and delivery fleets
If Autolane’s model works, it could quietly solve some of the most persistent headaches facing robotaxi and delivery operators. Today, a Waymo or a Cruise-style service might nail the route from a downtown office to a suburban Chick-fil-A, only to get snarled in a drive-thru line that blocks traffic or confuses the car’s perception system. Similarly, an autonomous delivery van might arrive at a big-box store like Home Depot with no clear idea where to stage, forcing human staff to improvise loading procedures on the fly. Those frictions add cost, erode reliability, and make it harder to scale fleets beyond tightly geofenced pilots.
By giving AVs a shared playbook for how to behave on private property, Autolane is trying to turn those messy edge cases into predictable routines. A robotaxi that knows it will always be assigned a specific numbered bay at a Chick-fil-A, or a delivery van that can count on a reserved loading slot at a Costco, can operate more like a scheduled airline than a wandering cab. That is the logic behind Seidl’s insistence that “someone is going to have to sit in the middle and orchestrate” the flow of vehicles at places like Chick-fil-A, Costco, and Home Depot, a role he has described in detail when discussing Seidl’s broader vision for AV infrastructure.
The competitive landscape and what comes next
For now, Autolane insists it has no direct competition in this exact niche, even as other companies nibble at adjacent problems like mapping, parking management, and curb analytics. That claim reflects how early the market is for a true “air traffic control” layer that spans multiple AV fleets and multiple property owners. The company’s focus on simple, replicable infrastructure, from signage to digital twins, suggests it is trying to build a standard before others realize how valuable that standard could become.
Whether Autolane can maintain that lead will depend on how quickly AV adoption spreads beyond tightly controlled pilots and into the everyday chaos of Chick-fil-A lines and Costco lots. If robotaxis and delivery bots remain rare, property owners may not feel enough pain to justify installing orchestration systems. But if fleets keep growing, the pressure to tame curbside congestion will only intensify, and the idea of a neutral coordinator that sits between AVs and the physical world, as described by Dec and other early observers, could shift from curiosity to necessity.
More from MorningOverview