Global shipping is one of the hardest sectors to decarbonize, yet it underpins almost every product that reaches a store shelf. As regulators tighten climate rules and trade keeps expanding, the search is on for propulsion that can move vast cargoes without burning fossil fuel. Small modular nuclear reactors, or SMRs, are emerging as a serious candidate to power the next generation of ocean carriers and sharply cut their emissions.
The idea is simple but disruptive: replace bunker fuel tanks with compact reactors that run for years without refueling, slashing greenhouse gases and freeing up space for cargo. The execution is anything but simple, involving new ship designs, safety regimes, port rules, and public acceptance. I see a technology that could transform maritime emissions, but only if industry and regulators move quickly to turn promising concepts into certified hardware at sea.
The scale of shipping’s climate problem
The modern economy rides on container ships and bulk carriers, and the numbers are stark. Research on marine pollution notes that the shipping industry is crucial to global trade, carrying over 90 % of all goods. Those vessels rely overwhelmingly on heavy fuel oil, and Emissions from maritime transport are described as a significant source of marine atmospheric pollution, contributing not just carbon dioxide but also sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter that harm coastal communities.
Regulators are responding. The International Maritime Organization has adopted progressively tighter climate targets, pushing shipowners to find alternatives to fossil fuel as part of a broader IMO strategy to reach net zero. Studies of ship pollution impacts underline that the international fleet now numbers tens of thousands of vessels, so incremental efficiency gains will not be enough to align with climate goals, especially as global trade volumes keep rising in line with economic growth.
Why nuclear, and why small modular reactors
Against that backdrop, nuclear power is being reexamined as a maritime fuel that can virtually eliminate exhaust at the ship’s funnel. Technical assessments argue that, in terms of climate impact, nuclear is one of the few options that can truly eliminate tank to wake emissions, meaning the gases produced directly by propulsion. That is a sharper cut than alternative fuels like methanol or ammonia, which still require upstream production that can be carbon intensive unless fully renewable.
Small modular designs are central to this renewed interest. A 2021 UN assessment cited by energy analysts found that Small modular nuclear reactors are a convenient, cost effective and low emission energy solution that could revitalize nuclear power. Maritime engineering studies add that SMRs produce zero greenhouse gases in operation and can be factory built, which, as one review of Next Gen Reactors notes, can reduce construction costs and duration compared with bespoke large plants.
From submarines to container ships
Nuclear propulsion at sea is not a blank slate. Today, some 200 nuclear reactors are already operating on 160 vessels, mostly naval ships and submarines, which shows that the basic physics and engineering of marine reactors are well understood. Those military systems, however, are expensive, heavily guarded, and not designed for commercial economics or civilian port operations.
What is new is the push to adapt next generation reactors to cargo ships and cruise liners. Analysts tracking Nuclear trends in shipping report that, as the maritime industry closed the chapter on 2025, one theme stood out, nuclear emerged as a promising energy source for shipping, with particular attention on Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). That shift reflects both climate pressure and the maturation of civilian SMR concepts that can be scaled to the tens or hundreds of megawatts needed for large commercial vessels.
The SMR shipping concepts taking shape
Several concrete projects now illustrate how SMRs might be integrated into real ships. Marine technology firms describe how Small modular nuclear reactors could cut commercial shipping emissions by one third if deployed at scale, in part because the reactor takes up less space than conventional fuel tanks and engines. Reporting on the same concept notes that, by David Szondy, the design would allow heavy duty ships to sail for years without refueling, which is particularly attractive on long haul routes where bunkering infrastructure for alternative fuels is limited.
On the technology side, companies such as Seaborg are developing compact molten salt reactors that can be mounted on floating power barges or integrated into newbuild vessels, while ship designers like Vard are exploring hull forms and safety layouts tailored to nuclear propulsion. Academic partners, including researchers at NTNU, are modeling how these systems would perform in real sea states and port conditions, and nuclear agencies such as the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency are examining regulatory frameworks that could govern their deployment.
Climate gains and commercial upside
The climate case for SMR powered ships rests on both direct and indirect benefits. Technical reviews of Next generation nuclear technologies emphasize that nuclear is one of the few options that can truly eliminate tank to wake emissions, which would sharply reduce the sector’s contribution to climate change and local air pollution. A separate analysis of Gen Reactors stresses that SMRs produce zero greenhouse gases in operation, a property that could help shipowners comply with tightening carbon intensity rules without relying on scarce green fuels.
There is also a hard nosed commercial logic. Coverage of nuclear powered cargo projects notes that nuclear propulsion would mean faster deliveries and higher revenue for shipping companies, because reactors can sustain higher speeds without fuel penalties, and that Plus, big ships need big fuel tanks, which can take up valuable space that could otherwise be used for containers or bulk cargo. If SMRs free up that volume while cutting fuel costs over a vessel’s lifetime, they could shift the economics of long distance shipping in favor of low carbon propulsion.
More from Morning Overview