Vladimir Putin is betting that artificial intelligence can patch the Russian army’s most dangerous weaknesses at the front, from sluggish decision making to chaotic logistics. The Kremlin is rolling out new battlefield software to push data and orders down the chain of command faster, hoping algorithms can do what exhausted officers and broken radios no longer can. Yet the same centralized culture that created the problem is now the biggest threat to this high tech fix.
Russia is trying to fight a data driven war against an opponent that has spent years turning itself into a laboratory for drones and software. Unless Moscow is willing to loosen political control and trust its own junior leaders, the new AI tools risk becoming another brittle system that looks impressive in a briefing slide and fails under fire.
Putin’s new battlefield AI and the command problem it is meant to solve
The Russian military command is reportedly fielding a tactical level situational awareness system designed to knit together front line feeds, maps and orders into a single digital picture for units in Ukraine. The goal is to give company and battalion commanders a clearer view of their sector and to shorten the time between spotting a target and firing, a gap that has often stretched into hours. According to assessments of The Russian campaign, this software is meant to streamline battlefield reporting and reduce the layers of manual approval that have slowed attacks and left units exposed.
The push fits with a broader effort to give front line officers AI based decision aids that can fuse drone video, artillery spotting and radio intercepts into recommended courses of action. Advocates of the system argue that it can compensate for the rigid hierarchy that has long defined Why Russia fights, where junior officers are trained to wait for instructions rather than improvise. The new tools are pitched as a way to push some initiative back down the chain without forcing a cultural revolution in how orders are given.
A centralized army tries to bolt on autonomy
The core flaw AI must overcome is structural. According to According to analyst Hanna Shelest, the Russian army is heavily centralized and hierarchical, with decisions concentrated at higher headquarters and little tolerance for improvisation. Shelest has described how this structure leaves units paralyzed when communications are jammed or commanders are killed, because the system has not trained subordinates to act independently.
Putin’s new AI initiative is meant to route around that bottleneck by giving front line leaders machine generated guidance that does not require constant phone calls back to brigade or army level staffs. Yet the same Russian culture that sidelines initiative also tends to treat software outputs as orders rather than advice. If commanders are punished for deviating from what the screen says, the system will simply hard code existing inflexibility into a faster loop.
Ukraine’s drone ecosystem exposes Russia’s AI gap
On the other side of the front, Ukraine has turned itself into a sprawling ecosystem of small teams building and fielding new drones in weeks, not years. One assessment notes that Ukraine is often described as a drone superpower, producing four million drones a year, while the United States makes less than one hundred thousand. That industrial base feeds a constant flow of new models and software updates to the front, where operators experiment with tactics and feed lessons back into the next batch.
Many of these systems remain under full human control, but a growing share use onboard algorithms to navigate, recognize targets or coordinate swarms, even if a human still approves lethal strikes. Reporting from the field describes how Drones with semiautonomous features are being tested alongside more traditional quadcopters, with Ukrainian officers and civilian technicians iterating on code in real time. That bottom up innovation cycle stands in sharp contrast to Russia’s attempt to inject AI into a rigid command system from the top down.
Russia’s brittle tech meets a resilient adversary
There is another problem for Putin’s AI gamble: the systems it depends on are already under sustained attack. A literature review of Ukraine’s drone campaign notes that Reports from the Institute for the, or ISW, and the RAND Corporation highlight serious vulnerabilities in Russia radar and air defense networks. Those weaknesses have allowed Ukrainian drones to penetrate deep into Russian territory, striking fuel depots and command posts that the new AI system will rely on for connectivity and data.
AI enabled command tools are also inherently fragile when pushed outside the scenarios they were trained on. One naval analysis warns that AI is often, showing dazzling strength in one dimension but liable to shatter in off nominal or vague situations. In a war where Ukrainian units constantly change routes, decoys and electronic signatures, Russian algorithms that were tuned on past patterns may misclassify threats or flood commanders with false positives at the worst possible moment.
The human flaw at the heart of Putin’s AI bet
Even the most sophisticated software cannot erase the human cost of Russia’s approach to this war. One assessment of how AI is changing conflict notes that Russia has increasingly been sending wounded soldiers, including some on crutches or in wheelchairs, back into combat. The same report warns that AI driven targeting is blurring the line between military and civilian sites, as algorithms prioritize efficiency over judgment. No amount of automation can turn such practices into a sustainable strategy, and they risk deepening domestic discontent as casualties mount.
Strategists like Paul Scharre have long warned that AI systems in war can generate catastrophic errors when humans defer too much to machine outputs. He often cites the case of Stanislav Petrov, the Soviet officer who correctly judged that a missile warning was a false alarm and refused to pass it up the chain. In a Russian command culture that prizes obedience and now layers AI on top, the risk is that there will be fewer Petrovs willing or able to question what the system says.
More from Morning Overview