America’s electric system is entering a stress test unlike anything in its history, with new research warning that the grid could be driven toward outright failure if current trends continue. A surge in demand from data centers, electrification and Artificial Intelligence is colliding with aging infrastructure, extreme weather and the rapid retirement of traditional power plants. The result is a growing risk that the backbone of the modern economy could buckle just as dependence on it reaches a peak.
Federal analysts and regional regulators are now describing the status quo as unsustainable, not in the abstract but in concrete projections of blackouts, capacity shortfalls and year-round reliability concerns. Their findings point to a simple but uncomfortable conclusion: unless the United States adds firm capacity, modernizes transmission and hardens the grid against both storms and cyberattacks, the possibility of cascading outages will move from theoretical to likely.
The federal warning: an “unsustainable” status quo
The Department of Energy has quietly delivered one of the starkest assessments yet of where the power system is headed. In a major analysis, the Department of Energy Releases Report on Evaluating U.S. Grid Reliability and Security and concludes that the current trajectory of plant retirements and incremental additions is not enough to keep the lights on as demand rises. The report’s Highlights of the Report describe the status quo as “unsustainable,” warning that blackouts will become more frequent and severe if the country fails to add additional firm capacity that can perform when it is needed most. That conclusion is rooted in detailed modeling of retirement schedules, load growth and resource performance, not in speculative scenarios.
What stands out in the Department of Energy’s work is how directly it links policy choices to reliability outcomes. The analysis finds that if current retirement schedules proceed while only modest new resources come online, the grid will struggle to meet peak demand and maintain reserves, especially during extreme weather. The Department of Energy stresses that the system needs additional firm capacity, not just more megawatts on paper, to handle rapid demand growth that is already threatening America’s energy security. In other words, the federal government is now on record that without a course correction, the country is steering toward a reliability cliff.
Regional regulators see risk spreading across North America
Federal warnings are being echoed, and in some cases sharpened, by the organizations that actually oversee grid reliability day to day. Jan research from NERC, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, under the banner NERC Warns Long Term Grid Reliability Risks Mounting from Surging Demand, Lagging Resources, finds that the balance between supply and demand is deteriorating across much of the continent. Thirteen of 23 North American assessment areas now face elevated or high risk of shortfalls, a shift that extends concerns from isolated regions to a broad swath of the interconnected system. NERC’s analysis points to surging demand, lagging resources and the rapid retirement of conventional plants as the core drivers.
Those findings are reinforced by grid regulators who warn that North America’s electric power system is not expanding fast enough to keep up with new loads as fossil fuels phase out. Reporting By Maydeen Merino notes that regulators see a growing gap between the pace of new generation and transmission and the speed at which older, dispatchable plants are being retired, which increases the risk to grid reliability. The concern is not simply about losing coal or gas, but about losing resources that can run around the clock and respond instantly to spikes in demand or sudden drops in wind and solar output. As more regions move into this precarious zone, the odds of a disturbance in one area cascading into a wider outage rise accordingly.
Data centers, Artificial Intelligence and the new demand shock
At the center of this emerging crisis is a demand shock driven by the digital economy. In the United States, the rise of Artificial Intelligence is forcing a reckoning with the power grid, as energy-hungry data centers proliferate in clusters that strain local infrastructure. A DOE backed report cited in coverage of winter risks finds that electricity demand from these facilities is growing so quickly that some regions could face winter energy shortages as data center growth accelerates. The concern is particularly acute in places like New York, NY, where dense urban load and limited space for new infrastructure make rapid expansion difficult.
Regional operators are sounding similar alarms. Jan analysis from PJM, the country’s largest grid operator, projects an energy shortfall by summer 2027 if planned retirements proceed and new resources do not materialize on schedule. State leaders are welcoming them, but PJM warns that a wave of new data centers, many tied to artificial intelligence, has driven demand far faster than previously expected. In parallel, another DOE backed assessment notes that, In the United States, Artificial Intelligence is reshaping load forecasts nationwide, with electricity demand from data centers rising so sharply that, due to limited grid and generation capacity, some projects may need to relocate or reduce it through efficiencies. Together, these findings suggest that the AI boom is not just a tech story, but a central factor in whether the grid can stay upright.
Extreme weather, cyber threats and the risk of cascading failure
Even as demand surges, the physical and digital threats facing the grid are multiplying. A study highlighted in Jun under the title Operational and economy-wide impacts of compound cyber-attacks and extreme weather events on electric power networks examines what happens when storms and cyber intrusions hit at the same time. The research finds that compound events can overwhelm both operations and the broader economy, with outages rippling through supply chains, including those for clean energy technologies. The implication is that traditional planning, which often treats weather and cyber risk separately, may underestimate the true danger of a coordinated or coincident attack.
New research from the North American Electric Reliability Corporation, summarized in a Feb segment that warns America’s grid could crash, underscores how these operational risks intersect with structural weaknesses. The segment notes that New findings from the North American Electric Reliability Corporation show that as more regions face year-round adequacy concerns, the margin for error during extreme events is shrinking. If a major storm or cyber incident hits when reserves are already thin, the system could tip from controlled outages into uncontrolled, cascading failure. In that scenario, restoring power is not a matter of flipping a switch, but of carefully rebuilding a complex machine under stress.
Where the crunch is already visible: New York and beyond
The looming crisis is not evenly distributed, and some regions are already feeling the squeeze. Jan warnings from NYISO, the grid operator for New York, state that New York will become a winter-peaking electric system, with demand increasing by 14,000 M by 2040 as heating, transportation and industry electrify. NYISO also cautions that beginning in the early 2030s, planned retirements and policy-driven changes could leave the system short of capacity during cold snaps, putting greater harm on New Yorkers if new resources and transmission do not arrive in time. Those projections are now central to debates in Albany over how quickly to retire existing plants and how aggressively to build replacements.
Other regions are confronting similar trade-offs, even if the numbers differ. In parts of the Mid-Atlantic and Midwest, PJM has warned that, without new investment, the combination of plant closures and rising demand could leave the system short by the middle of the decade. State leaders are welcoming them, but the same data centers that promise jobs and tax revenue are also driving up local load and forcing expensive upgrades to substations and transmission lines. As I see it, the pattern is clear: policymakers are inviting energy-intensive industries without always ensuring that the grid can support them, a mismatch that pushes reliability risk onto households and small businesses that have no say in siting decisions.
More from Morning Overview