NASA scientists are sounding an alarm that would have been unthinkable a decade ago: the same commercial satellite constellations promising global internet coverage could severely compromise the Hubble Space Telescope’s view of the universe. As thousands of new spacecraft brighten the night sky, researchers now warn that Hubble’s images are increasingly at risk of being streaked, contaminated, or rendered unusable.
The stakes go far beyond one observatory. The surge of satellites in low orbit threatens to turn near‑Earth space into a layer of moving mirrors, scattering sunlight into sensitive instruments and undermining decades of investment in space astronomy. What began as a debate over backyard stargazing has become a high‑stakes collision between commercial expansion and the scientific quest to see deeper into the cosmos.
Hubble’s shrinking window on the universe
The Hubble Space Telescope was designed to escape the blur of Earth’s atmosphere, not to dodge a swarm of bright artificial objects racing across its field of view. Yet NASA’s own analysis now finds that a growing fraction of Hubble’s images are marred by satellite trails, a problem that will only intensify as more constellations go up. One recent study warns that for some space telescopes, reflections from orbiting spacecraft could ruin more than 95% of images, a figure that captures how quickly the balance is tipping against astronomers.
For Hubble specifically, NASA researchers estimate that its narrower field of view could see around 39.6% of images affected as satellite constellations expand, a level of interference that would fundamentally change how the observatory is scheduled and how much usable science it can deliver. Instead of clean exposures of faint galaxies and nebulae, astronomers increasingly face bright streaks that can saturate detectors, corrupt data, and force expensive re‑observations. The warning is not abstract: it is a forecast that a workhorse of modern astronomy could spend a large share of its remaining life dodging commercial hardware.
How satellite “light pollution” actually works
From the ground, satellite interference often looks like a cosmetic problem, a bright line across a long‑exposure photograph. For space telescopes, the physics is more punishing. Satellites reflect and emit multiple types of light, from sunlight bouncing off solar panels to glints from antennas and thermal emissions from their electronics. NASA’s study notes that Satellites do not just create a single flash; They can contaminate an exposure over a significant fraction of its duration, cutting into precious operational time.
Because Hubble orbits above the atmosphere, it is exquisitely sensitive to faint light, which makes it especially vulnerable to even modest reflections from satellites passing through its line of sight. The problem is compounded by the geometry of low Earth orbit, where spacecraft can catch the Sun while the telescope is in darkness, creating bright moving sources against an otherwise black background. As more constellations are deployed, the probability that any given exposure will intersect one of these moving mirrors climbs, turning what used to be rare nuisances into routine obstacles.
Megaconstellations and the scale of the threat
The core of NASA’s concern is not any single satellite, but the sheer number of spacecraft that companies plan to loft into low orbit. SpaceX’s Starlink network is the most visible example, and earlier warnings from NASA highlighted that Starlink alone aims to deploy roughly 30,000 satellites. That figure sits on top of thousands already in orbit, and it is only one company’s plan in a crowded field of proposed constellations.
New modeling suggests that if all current proposals move forward, the number of satellites could explode. One analysis cited by NASA researchers warns that existing constellations could be joined by as many as 500,000 m additional spacecraft over the next decade, a scale that would transform near‑Earth space into a dense shell of moving objects. Another study calculates that if 560,000 proposed satellites are launched in the coming decade, the impact on space‑based astronomy would be profound, especially compared with the roughly 2,000 satellites that used to define the entire orbital population. The jump from thousands to hundreds of thousands is what turns a manageable nuisance into a systemic threat.
Why NASA is naming Hubble and Hubble‑like missions
NASA’s latest study is unusually blunt in one respect: it explicitly warns that not even space telescopes like Hubble will be safe from the growing glare. Now the agency is not just flagging risks for future observatories, but acknowledging that NASA’s own flagship, Hubble, is directly in the crosshairs of satellite constellations. The study also points to a future European space telescope facing similar risks, underscoring that this is a global scientific problem, not a niche concern for one agency.
By naming specific missions, NASA is effectively telling policymakers and industry that the cost of inaction will be measured in lost discoveries. Hubble has delivered iconic images and fundamental insights into dark energy, galaxy evolution, and planetary atmospheres, and it still plays a crucial role alongside the James Webb Space Telescope. When astronomers used that newer observatory to spot the faintest known galaxy in the early universe and publish the findings in Nature, they were building on decades of groundwork laid by Hubble’s deep surveys. If Hubble’s remaining years are compromised, the entire ecosystem of multi‑telescope astronomy, where different observatories work in concert, will suffer.
From a “drop in the bucket” to a flood
For now, the number of satellites actually in orbit is still small compared with what companies have on the drawing board. Astronomers note that today’s constellations are only the beginning, and But that is a drop in the bucket compared to what is coming if all plans filed with regulators are approved. The phrase captures a sobering reality: the interference astronomers are already documenting is only a preview of a much more crowded sky.
As more companies seek licenses for their own constellations, the cumulative effect becomes harder to manage. Each new system adds more moving points of light, more potential trails across Hubble’s detectors, and more complexity for mission planners trying to schedule observations around predicted passes. The transition from a few thousand satellites to hundreds of thousands is not linear in its impact on astronomy; it is closer to a tipping point, where the probability of clean, uncontaminated images drops sharply.
Regulators, responsibility, and the role of SpaceX
Behind NASA’s warning is a policy vacuum. In the US, satellite activity is regulated by the Federal Communications Commission, which is tasked with ensuring that commercial launches comply with national and international obligations. Yet the FCC’s traditional focus has been on spectrum and collision risk, not on the cumulative optical impact of thousands of bright satellites on space telescopes. As a result, NASA’s concerns about Hubble and other observatories are arriving in a regulatory environment that was never designed to weigh scientific visibility as a core constraint.
SpaceX, as the most aggressive builder of megaconstellations, sits at the center of this debate. Earlier warnings from Starlink‑related filings highlighted NASA’s worries about collision avoidance and debris, but the new Hubble‑focused study adds a different dimension: even perfectly controlled satellites can still pollute astronomical images. As NASA presses for mitigation, the question is whether regulators will start treating optical interference as seriously as radio interference and orbital safety, and whether companies like SpaceX will accept binding limits on how bright their spacecraft can be.
Mitigation ideas and their limits
Industry and astronomers are not starting from zero. After early backlash over bright Starlink satellites, companies began experimenting with darker coatings, visor‑like shades, and different orientations to reduce reflections. A recent set of recommendations from astronomers outlined a host of changes, and They included requests that manufacturers limit how reflective satellites are and adjust their orbits and attitudes to minimize their impact on sensitive observations. These technical tweaks can help, and some early tests have shown measurable reductions in brightness.
Yet mitigation has hard limits when the numbers climb into the hundreds of thousands. Even a dimmer satellite can still ruin a long exposure if it passes directly through the field, and Hubble’s sensitivity means that faint trails can still be problematic for the most delicate measurements. Software tools can sometimes mask or subtract trails, but that process is imperfect and can erase or distort real astronomical features. NASA’s warning about Hubble is, in part, a recognition that mitigation alone cannot fully offset the impact of unconstrained growth in satellite constellations.
What is at risk if Hubble’s view is compromised
Hubble’s scientific legacy is not just a gallery of pretty pictures; it is a foundation for precision cosmology and galaxy evolution studies that rely on clean, deep exposures. When astronomers combine Hubble’s optical data with infrared observations from the NASA James Webb Space Telescope, they can reconstruct the growth of the earliest galaxies and test models of dark matter. The detection of the faintest known galaxy in the early universe, with results published in Nature, is one example of how much is riding on the ability to capture pristine data.
If nearly two out of five Hubble images become contaminated as projected, the cost is not just lost time but lost opportunities. Some phenomena, such as supernovae or transient events in distant galaxies, cannot simply be re‑observed at leisure; they happen once. A satellite trail across such an event can erase a unique window into stellar physics or cosmology. NASA’s warning about Hubble is therefore a warning about the fragility of discovery itself in an era when near‑Earth space is being commercialized at unprecedented speed.
The long view: what kind of orbit do we want?
Looking ahead, astronomers stress that the problem is only going to get worse without deliberate limits. One analysis notes that And the projections show that if companies follow through on their launch plans, Earth’s orbit could host hundreds of thousands of satellites by the end of the 2030s. That timeline overlaps directly with Hubble’s remaining years and with the prime operating period of other major observatories, meaning decisions made now will shape what science is possible for a generation.
NASA’s warning about SpaceX constellations imperiling Hubble is, at its core, a question about how humanity chooses to use the space around its own planet. The benefits of global connectivity and commercial services are real, but so is the value of a clear, unobstructed view of the universe. As regulators, companies, and scientists negotiate the future of low orbit, Hubble’s threatened images serve as a stark reminder that once the sky is crowded, it will be very hard to make it quiet again.
More from MorningOverview