For years, bottled water has been marketed as the cleaner, safer alternative to whatever comes out of the kitchen faucet. Now the scientist behind one of the most detailed tests of plastic contamination in drinking water is urging people to do the opposite and fill a glass from the tap instead. His warning lands at a moment when researchers are finding not just microplastics, but far smaller nanoplastics, in quantities that challenge the basic assumption that bottled water is the “pure” choice.
The emerging science does not claim tap water is pristine. It does, however, show that in many places, plastic bottles themselves are a major source of contamination. Faced with that evidence, I find the case for switching to filtered tap water, where it is available and safe, increasingly hard to ignore.
Why a microplastics scientist is telling people to drink from the tap
The expert driving the latest shift in public conversation is the Scientist Who Tested Microplastics Levels in bottled water and then publicly said people should be Bottled Water Says You Should Be “Drinking It Straight Out of the Tap.” In that work, he and his colleagues measured plastic particles in popular brands and concluded that the packaging and processing were adding a significant burden of synthetic debris to every bottle. His argument is blunt: if the choice is between swallowing plastic that has shed from a single-use container or drinking properly treated municipal water, the safer bet is usually the tap, especially once a basic home filter is in place, a point he reiterated in the Stock imagery–laden coverage of his findings.
That advice is backed up by broader research into how plastics behave in contact with water. A detailed analysis of U.S. supplies, described in Feb reporting on how Some bottled water is worse than tap for microplastics, found that to better understand the concentration levels in a segment of the U.S. water supply, scientists analyzed water samples from four treatment systems and compared them with commercial products, publishing their results in Science of The Total Environment, a study that is summarized in Feb. A companion summary of the same work notes that Some brands of bottled water contain significantly higher levels of microplastics than the tap water they compete with, reinforcing the scientist’s call to rethink the reflex of grabbing a bottle, as detailed in Some.
What the new science actually finds inside bottled water
Behind the scientist’s stark advice is a wave of research that has peered into bottled water at scales that were not possible a decade ago. Using sophisticated imaging technology, Researchers have discovered thousands of nanoplastic bits in bottles of drinking water, and New work has found that the quantity of nanoplastic particles is far greater than previously believed, according to a detailed account in Jan. These particles are small enough that scientists warn they may cross the blood-brain barrier, raising questions that toxicologists are only beginning to answer. Researchers at Columbia University, USA, expanded on that work by showing that an imaging approach previously used for other materials could reveal nanoplastics in bottled water at levels an order of magnitude higher than earlier estimates, a finding laid out in Revealing Nanoplastics.
Other researchers have translated those microscopic counts into a more intuitive comparison. By Joseph Winters, Grist reported that bottled water has up to 100 times more plastic particles than previously measured when nanoplastics are included, a leap that came from applying the Columbia and Rutgers methods to popular brands, as summarized in Joseph Winters, Grist. A separate overview of the Columbia University, USA work on nanoplastics in bottled water underscores that the new imaging tools are not just finding more particles, they are revealing a complex mix of polymer types that likely originate from the bottle walls, caps and even the filters used in bottling plants, as detailed in Bottled Water.
Microplastics, nanoplastics and your body
Scientists are still mapping what all of this plastic does once it is inside the human body, but the early signals are not reassuring. Microplastics are so widespread that they now show up in blood, lungs and even placental tissue, a pattern that has prompted physicians and environmental health experts to warn that chronic exposure could aggravate inflammation and cardiovascular disease, as described in a detailed overview of these risks in Even. Nanoplastics, which are smaller still, raise additional concerns because their size makes it easier for them to cross cell membranes and, as Researchers have warned, potentially cross the blood-brain barrier, a point highlighted in Researchers.
Physicians are now trying to translate those lab findings into practical guidance. In a new scientific paper, three physicians report that switching from bottled water to filtered tap water could cut your microplastic intake significantly, a conclusion shared in a summary that notes how those that drink plastic bottled water in comparison to those that drink tap water are ingesting far more particles, as described in Jan. Another summary of the same paper emphasizes that in a new scientific paper, three physicians report that switching from bottled water to filtered tap water could cut your microplastic exposure, reinforcing the idea that the container, not just the source, is a key driver of risk, as highlighted in new study review.
Why bottled water can be worse than the tap
One of the most counterintuitive findings in the recent research is that some bottled water is not just as contaminated as tap, it is worse. To better understand the concentration levels in a segment of the U.S. water supply, scientists analyzed water samples from four treatment systems and then compared them with bottled products, concluding that Some bottled water is worse than tap for microplastics, a result that is detailed in Some bottled water. A related summary notes that Some brands of bottled water contain significantly higher levels of microplastics than the tap water they compete with, and that this difference is large enough that the authors urged consumers to reconsider grabbing pre-bottled water, as described in Some.
The packaging itself is a major culprit. Nearly all the bottles, 93 percent in one analysis, shed plastic from their caps into the water, meaning that every twist and reseal can add more fragments to what you drink, a pattern described in an investigation into What is in your water bottle and the Concerns about microplastics in caps, which found that When you drink from a plastic water bottle, you could be exposed to additional particles from the closure, as summarized in Oct. A second summary of that work stresses that nearly all the bottles, 93 percent, contributed microplastics from caps into the water, underscoring how ubiquitous this problem is in our food and water, as detailed in What.
How much plastic you might be drinking, and how to cut it
For people who rely heavily on bottled water, the numbers add up quickly. Experts estimate that people who drink only bottled water may be ingesting an additional 90,000 microplastics every year compared with those who drink tap water, a figure that appears in a video explainer that also notes how physicians like Dr. Trisha Pasricha are now counseling patients about these exposures, as reported by Jan. Another summary of the same estimate reiterates that Experts calculate that people who drink only bottled water may be ingesting an additional 90,000 m microplastics every year compared with those who drink tap water, a stark reminder of how packaging choices can shape daily exposure, as detailed in Experts.
More from Morning Overview