Global warming is no longer a distant forecast but a lived reality, with recent measurements showing the planet already significantly hotter than the twentieth‑century norm. As human emissions keep rising, scientists are increasingly focused on a second, unnerving question: will natural systems that once buffered us now start amplifying the crisis. The prospect that forests, soils, wetlands and polar ice could flip from brake to accelerator is emerging as one of the defining climate risks of the coming decades.
Instead of a simple story of smokestacks and tailpipes, the climate problem is turning into a feedback puzzle, where each fraction of a degree of extra heat can trigger new releases of carbon and methane. That is what people mean when they warn that nature could “supercharge” climate change, and it is why the choices governments and companies make in the next few years will determine whether the planet’s living systems remain allies or become powerful sources of additional warming.
Warming world, shrinking margin for error
The starting point is the pace of heating already locked in. Scientists report that Global temperatures in 2025 were cooler than 2024, yet still about 2.14 degrees Fahrenheit, or 1.19 degrees Celsius, above the 1951 to 1980 average. That level of warming is already enough to turbocharge heatwaves, shift rainfall patterns and stress ecosystems that evolved in a cooler climate. According to an Introduction to “Ten new insights in climate science 2024”, the World Meteorological Organization, or WMO, confirmed that 2024 was the warmest year on record, with greenhouse gas concentrations continuing to increase throughout 2023 and 2024.
That acceleration matters because it shortens the lag between cause and effect. One analysis framed it bluntly under the heading Why acceleration matters, warning that climate inertia is shrinking and that extreme events that once seemed rare now occur every year, affecting millions worldwide. As the baseline warms, the risk grows that natural carbon stores, from frozen ground to tropical soils, will start releasing more heat‑trapping gases, making it harder for any future cuts in fossil fuel use to catch up.
Permafrost, soils and wetlands on a knife edge
One of the starkest examples of nature turning from sink to source lies in the Arctic. United Nations environment experts warn that Thawing permafrost could release massive amounts of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, supercharging warming by mid‑century. The same assessment notes that, without big changes, the Amazon rainforest, referred to as The Amazon, could be pushed toward a tipping point by 2050 as the global population climbs toward 9.2 billion people. Both systems currently store vast quantities of carbon, and their destabilization would add a powerful new pulse of emissions on top of human activity.
Closer to the equator, scientists are finding that warming can flip even lush, seemingly stable ecosystems into sources of extra carbon. In Puerto Rico’s Puerto Rico Luquillo Experimental Forest, researchers have shown that heating the ground surface with infrared lamps speeds up microbial activity in Soil, causing more carbon dioxide to escape. The study, conducted in the Luquillo Experimental Forest and Using infrared heaters, concluded that soil warming boosts carbon loss and can accelerate climate change. Wetlands, long treated as quiet climate allies, are also under scrutiny. One analysis of marshes and peatlands noted that “for decades we have taken wetlands for granted,” and cited a poll of scientists and policymakers who largely agree that without these natural systems soaking up pollution, the world cannot zero out emissions, even as some degraded wetlands begin emitting more methane than they store in carbon dioxide in the short term.
Fire, forests and the risk of cascading feedbacks
As temperatures rise, the line between natural disturbance and climate feedback is blurring. Hotter, drier conditions are already raising the risks and stakes of extreme wildfires, with one assessment bluntly titled Yes, Climate Change,. Those fires do more than destroy homes and choke cities with smoke. They also release decades of stored carbon in forests and peat, and in some regions they prevent regrowth from keeping pace with the losses, turning once‑reliable carbon sinks into intermittent sources of emissions.
At the same time, scientists are re‑evaluating how much help we can still expect from intact forests. Key Takeaways from a major Research effort by The Nature Conservancy and 15 other institutions, published in the Nature Conservancy and in the Proceedings of the, show that natural climate solutions such as reforestation, better forest management and protection of habitat could deliver a large share of the cost‑effective mitigation needed by 2030. Yet those same forests are increasingly exposed to drought, pests and fire, which means that banking on them without cutting fossil fuel use is a gamble with the feedbacks described above.
Nature as ally, not scapegoat
Despite the growing list of risks, it would be a mistake to cast the living world only as a threat. The European Commission stresses that Nature is an essential ally in the fight against climate change, with Our natural ecosystems, such as forests, oceans and wetlands, absorbing carbon dioxide and keeping it safely stored. Earlier work on natural climate solutions argued that Nature is always cast as the victim in the climate drama, But what if it could be the superhero, delivering emissions cuts while providing cleaner water, more resilient coasts and healthier soils.
The challenge is that current efforts to harness that potential are not yet delivering at scale. One recent assessment defined Nature-based climate solutions as human actions that leverage natural systems to reduce greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere, where these gases trap heat, and concluded that many such projects are falling short because they are poorly designed or not integrated with local communities. Another global review that examined over 20,000 scientific articles found that 20,000 studies had been reviewed and that 71% concluded that nature‑based solutions are a cost‑effective way to reduce climate risk, including from floods, hurricanes, heatwaves and landslides, with 71% of studies reaching that conclusion. The evidence suggests that if these initiatives are restructured and scaled up, they can keep nature on the mitigation side of the ledger rather than letting degradation turn it into a source of runaway emissions.
What tipping points mean for people
Behind the technical language of feedbacks and tipping points lies a very human story. As global warming accelerates, the impacts are showing up in food systems, coastal safety and even seismic risk. A roundup of Global Warming News highlighted how Science Daily Coral reefs could feed millions if we let them rebuild, and noted that Jan reports described how Scientists linked climate‑driven changes to conditions that may have supercharged a Chile earthquake. These stories underscore that climate feedbacks are not abstract. They shape fisheries, disaster risk and the basic stability of the places people call home.
Looking ahead to 2050, the United Nations warns that without big changes, planet‑warming greenhouse gas emissions will keep rising as the world’s population approaches 9.2 billion people, with cascading effects on ecosystems from permafrost to Dec forests. The question is not whether nature will respond to that pressure, but how. If emissions keep climbing, thawing ground, drying wetlands and stressed forests are likely to add their own gases to the atmosphere, effectively supercharging the problem humans started. If, instead, governments move quickly to cut fossil fuel use while restoring ecosystems, the same natural systems can absorb more carbon, buffer extreme weather and buy time for deeper transformations. The window to choose between those futures is narrowing, but it has not yet closed.
More from Morning Overview