General Motors is promising to build more vehicles in the United States than Ford even as it warns that new trade barriers could saddle it with as much as $4 billion in extra costs. The company is leaning on its strongest products, aggressive cost cutting and a friendlier policy backdrop to argue that higher tariffs will dent, but not derail, its profit ambitions. At stake is not just a long‑running rivalry with Ford, but whether a legacy automaker can grow earnings while absorbing a tariff shock and reworking its electric‑vehicle strategy.
GM’s message to investors is blunt: it plans to outproduce its crosstown competitor in its home market, keep lifting margins on trucks and SUVs, and still return billions to shareholders, even as it pays more for imported parts and vehicles. That confidence rests on a mix of factory investments, a pivot back toward profitable internal‑combustion models and a belief that the current White House’s tariff and regulatory posture is increasingly aligned with what U.S. car buyers actually want.
GM’s production push and the Ford benchmark
GM has told investors it expects to build more vehicles in the United States than Ford, a symbolic and practical milestone in a rivalry that has defined Detroit for generations. The company is ramping output of high‑volume models such as the General Motors Chevrolet Traverse and other large SUVs at key plants, betting that robust demand for family haulers and pickups will support higher utilization across its North American footprint. Internally, executives are treating the Ford comparison as a way to signal confidence in their manufacturing system and to underscore that GM intends to be the volume leader in its home market even as tariffs raise its cost base, a point underscored in detailed guidance on U.S. production.
The company has been explicit that this output goal comes even as it faces between $3 billion and $4 billion in additional tariff costs tied to President Donald Trump’s trade policies, which have extended and expanded levies on imported vehicles and components. GM has framed the higher build plan as both an operational challenge and a political signal, arguing that more domestic production supports U.S. jobs and could help it navigate future policy shifts. The automaker has highlighted how quickly it can ramp assembly of models like the General Motors Chevrolet Traverse on its lines, a capability it has showcased in investor materials that reference prompts such as Follow, FREE and ACCOUNT around factory ramp‑ups, while also reiterating that Ford remains the key benchmark it intends to surpass in U.S. output, a goal repeated in social posts that stress GM expects to top Ford.
Tariffs as a multibillion‑dollar headwind
Behind the bravado on production, GM is candid that tariffs are a serious drag on its finances. The company has told investors it expects between $3 billion and $4 billion in tariff costs in 2026, slightly higher than the $3.1 billion hit it absorbed in 2025 as new levies were phased in. In prior disclosures, GM said it was able to offset more than 40 percent of that $3.1 billion tariff impact through a mix of cost reductions, manufacturing changes and pricing actions, a mitigation effort detailed in its discussion of $3.1 billion in duties. For the full year, GM has said it offset more than 40 percent of its total tariff bill, underscoring how deeply the company has already dug into its cost structure to blunt the impact of trade policy on its bottom line, a point it has repeated in summaries that emphasize that figure of 40 percent.
GM’s own framing is that tariff risk is manageable rather than existential. Investor analyses have noted that the company’s guidance already bakes in $3‑4 billion in extra tariff costs for 2026 and still points to higher earnings, suggesting management believes it can claw back much of the hit through efficiency gains and pricing power. One breakdown of the outlook explicitly labels this as a Tariff risk that is already reflected in forecasts, pointing out that GM’s exposure is concentrated in specific import flows, including some Korean‑made vehicles, and that the company has room to reconfigure sourcing if needed, a view captured in commentary on Tariff exposure. GM has also reminded investors that the current tariff regime was not fully in effect until partway through 2025, which is why the $3.1 billion figure is expected to rise in 2026, a nuance it highlighted when it explained that the levies were not implemented until April in its discussion of tariff timing.
Profits, EV charges and a pivot back to trucks
Even as tariffs bite, GM’s core operations in North America are generating more profit, largely thanks to higher demand for SUVs and pickup trucks. The company has reported that its core profit rose on the back of strong sales of these vehicles, and it has raised its 2026 profit outlook accordingly, citing the resilience of its truck and SUV franchises in the region. In one detailed breakdown, General Motors explained that in 2025 it offset more than 40 percent of its tariff costs through cost cuts and manufacturing efficiencies, even as it warned that new tariffs would raise expenses in 2026, a dynamic it laid out in its discussion of General Motors. Another summary of its quarterly performance emphasized that NORTH AMERICAN DEMAND BOOSTS QUARTER, underscoring how much of GM’s earnings power now rests on large, high‑margin vehicles that are overwhelmingly built and sold in the United States, a point the company has stressed in materials that literally headline NORTH, AMERICAN, DEMAND, BOOSTS and QUARTER to describe its regional demand.
Those gains have come alongside painful accounting charges tied to GM’s electric‑vehicle reset. In its latest annual results, the company reported that net income fell sharply after it booked large EV‑related write‑downs, with one Dive Brief noting that General Motors on Tuesday reported a 55% decline, or $3.3 billion, in year‑over‑year net income in 2025 from a prior $6 billion baseline. GM has framed those charges as the cost of slowing and reshaping its EV rollout while doubling down on profitable internal‑combustion models, a strategy it defended in that same Dive Brief. Another detailed recap of the year’s results reiterated that General Motors on Tuesday reported the same 55% and $3.3 billion figures, while stressing that the company is now prioritizing building more profitable ICE vehicles to fund its transition, a message repeated in a second General Motors summary.
Guidance, shareholder rewards and a friendlier policy climate
Despite the tariff and EV headwinds, GM has raised its earnings guidance for 2026 and sweetened payouts to shareholders. General Motors has told investors it now expects adjusted earnings per share between $11 and $13 in 2026, a range that just edges past the $11.95 consensus estimate compiled by FactSet, a detail highlighted in a breakdown of General Motors’ 2026 adjusted earnings‑per‑share guidance that explicitly cites the $11.95 figure when comparing forecasts with Wall Street expectations, a comparison laid out in materials focused on $11.95. The company has paired that guidance with a larger dividend and a multibillion‑dollar share buyback, arguing that its balance sheet and cash generation can support both heavy investment and generous capital returns, a stance that has helped push its stock to record highs according to investor commentary on record highs.
More from Morning Overview