Federal investigators say a deadly midair collision near Washington, D.C., that killed 67 people was not a freak accident but the result of missed chances to keep aircraft safely separated. At the center of their criticism is the Federal Aviation Administration, which the National Transportation Safety Board says failed to divert helicopters even after an earlier near miss exposed the danger of mixing low‑flying rotorcraft with airliners lining up for Reagan National Airport. The findings paint a picture of systemic breakdowns in oversight, technology and basic risk management in some of the country’s most tightly controlled airspace.
In a daylong public hearing, NTSB officials described a chain of decisions and nondecisions that left both pilots flying into blind spots with almost no margin for error. They argued that the crash was 100% preventable, and that the government’s own records show years of warnings about congested traffic patterns that were never fully addressed. The question now is whether the FAA’s promised reforms will be enough to restore confidence in the skies over the nation’s capital.
The collision that exposed a fragile system
Investigators say the midair collision unfolded just outside the approach path to Reagan Washington National Airport, where a passenger jet and a helicopter converged with little time to react. The impact killed 67 people, a toll that underscores how a single lapse in separation can turn a routine evening into a mass‑casualty disaster in seconds. According to NTSB staff, both pilots were operating within their assigned corridors, yet each was effectively flying blind to the other’s presence until it was too late, a scenario the board later recreated through detailed Safety simulations.
The NTSB’s reconstruction showed how terrain, cockpit design and the geometry of the flight paths combined to hide the conflicting traffic from view. In its presentation, The NTSB emphasized that neither pilot had a realistic chance to see and avoid the other aircraft in time, given the speeds involved and the narrow vertical gap between their assigned altitudes. That is why the board has focused less on individual errors and more on the system that allowed a helicopter route to pass within roughly 75 feet of airliners descending toward the runway, a margin that NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy described as shockingly small when she pressed the Homendy case in public.
Years of ignored warnings and a near miss
According to the board, the collision did not come out of nowhere. NTSB investigators said the Army and the FAA had been warned for years that helicopter traffic near Reagan National was creating dangerous congestion, with multiple reports of close calls involving low‑flying rotorcraft and civilian jets. In one earlier incident, a helicopter on the same route came uncomfortably close to an airliner, a near miss that should have prompted an immediate rethinking of how aircraft were sequenced into the airport’s constrained airspace. Instead, the route remained in use, and the FAA did not order controllers to divert or reroute helicopters away from the most crowded arrival paths, a pattern of inaction that NTSB staff highlighted as they detailed how the Missed warnings accumulated.
Homendy said she could not believe the FAA did not recognize that the helicopter route provided at most a mere 75 feet of vertical separation from some airliners, a figure that left almost no buffer for turbulence, instrument error or human delay. The NTSB has framed that number as emblematic of a deeper cultural problem, in which incremental risk increases were tolerated because no catastrophe had yet occurred. By the time the board convened its Jan hearing, the US government had already acknowledged negligence in the way both the FAA and the military handled the traffic mix, a rare admission that reflects how stark the Read record of ignored alerts had become.
“100% preventable”: systemic failures at the FAA
When the NTSB summed up its findings, it did not hedge. Board members said the crash was 100% preventable, arguing that a series of missed opportunities at the FAA allowed a known hazard to persist in some of the country’s most scrutinized airspace. Among the most damning points was the agency’s failure to divert helicopters even after the earlier near miss, a decision that left controllers managing a fragile choreography of jets and rotorcraft with almost no structural safeguards. The board described this as part of a broader pattern of systemic failures, from inadequate risk assessments to slow adoption of collision‑avoidance technology, that collectively set the stage for the NTSB verdict.
Investigators also pointed to the low maximum altitude assigned to the helicopter route, which capped flights at 200 feet, or 61 meters, above the ground in some segments near the airport. That ceiling kept helicopters tucked under commercial traffic but also left them with little room to maneuver if something went wrong, especially in poor visibility or at night. Safety advocates say that combination of low altitude, tight lateral spacing and minimal vertical separation created a textbook example of an unacceptable risk envelope, one that should have triggered urgent changes long before the fatal collision. As lawmakers now push to mandate more advanced traffic‑awareness systems on both military and civilian aircraft near Reagan National, they are citing the same Lawmakers record of systemic failure that the NTSB laid out.
FAA’s response: new rules and a safety reset
Under intense scrutiny, the FAA has begun to outline how it plans to rebuild the safety net around Reagan National and similar airports. The agency has acknowledged that its previous approach to helicopter integration in the capital region fell short, and it has moved to permanently restrict helicopters and powered‑lift aircraft from operating in certain corridors near the airport. In an Interim Final Rule published earlier this year, the FAA said it would sharply limit low‑level rotorcraft traffic in the most congested approach and departure paths, a step that effectively eliminates the route that brought the doomed helicopter into conflict with the airliner and responds directly to the FAA criticism.
The agency has also announced the creation of a Safety Integration Office focused on how new and existing aircraft types share crowded airspace, from traditional helicopters to powered‑lift designs and future electric air taxis. That office is tasked with reviewing routes, altitudes and procedures at complex airports nationwide, including Reagan National and Hollywood Burbank Airport, to ensure that no other facility is relying on razor‑thin margins similar to the 75‑foot gap that alarmed Homendy. In its Interim Final Rule, which the FAA said it Published in Jan 2026, the agency framed these changes as the first phase of a broader modernization effort, one that will be refined as more data and feedback arrive through the Interim Final Rule process.
What changes in the sky over Washington
For people on the ground in Washington, the most visible change may be fewer helicopters tracing the river and skyline near the airport, especially during peak airline arrival banks. The restricted zones and altitude adjustments are designed to carve out clearer vertical and lateral layers, so that jets on final approach are no longer sharing a narrow slice of airspace with low‑level rotorcraft. That shift will affect not only military and law‑enforcement flights but also sightseeing operators and charter services that once relied on scenic routes along the Potomac, many of which passed near landmarks now under closer scrutiny in the wake of the place crash.
More from Morning Overview