Physicists have not yet watched a black hole literally blow itself apart, but they are closing in on the conditions where such an event might finally be seen. At the same time, telescopes are catching black holes in violent outbursts that look, from our vantage point, like cosmic volcanoes lighting up intergalactic space. Taken together, these discoveries and predictions are forcing a rethink of what black holes are, how they evolve and whether some of them might eventually detonate in ways that expose the deepest workings of the universe.
I see a growing tension between two pictures. On one side are supermassive black holes that flare, feed and erupt while remaining fundamentally intact. On the other are tiny primordial black holes that some theorists now argue could end their lives in spectacular explosions within our cosmic neighborhood. The headline idea of an “exploding black hole” sits at the intersection of those two stories, and the latest research suggests it is no longer science fiction, even if the first confirmed blast is still to come.
From invisible monsters to erupting giants
For most of modern astrophysics, black holes have been treated as the ultimate one-way doors, regions of space so dense that nothing, not even light, can escape their pull. As one classic description puts it, NOBODY has ever seen a black hole directly, and yet, Yet, the evidence for their existence has piled up through the behavior of stars and gas swirling around them. That traditional view leaves little room for anything that could be described as an explosion, because once matter crosses the event horizon it is supposed to be gone for good.
What astronomers can see, however, is what happens just outside that point of no return, and here the story has become far more dramatic. When a massive object strays too close, tidal forces can rip it apart and funnel the debris into a hot, bright disk that feeds the black hole while blasting energy into space. In one recent case, a so-called Super star being shredded by a black hole released as much energy as 400 billion suns, a reminder that even a “normal” feeding event can rival the output of an entire galaxy. None of this means the black hole itself is exploding, but it shows how easily the environment around one can mimic the violence of a detonation.
A “reborn” black hole that behaves like a cosmic volcano
The most vivid recent example of this eruptive behavior comes from a supermassive black hole that appears to have switched back on after a long quiet spell. Astronomers have traced jets from this reborn object stretching across roughly 1 million light years, carving out cavities in surrounding gas and lighting up radio wavelengths like a slow-motion blast wave. The scale is so vast that the outflow has been likened to a volcano venting across intergalactic space, with material and energy funneled out along narrow beams that stay coherent over unimaginable distances.
Follow-up analysis of the same system has focused on how this activity restarted and what it says about the life cycle of black holes. In a more detailed look, researchers described how the Jan observation of this system revealed structures that must have been inflated by repeated outbursts, not a single instantaneous blast. That distinction matters for the headline question. What we are seeing here is an eruption powered by accretion and jets, not the black hole itself tearing apart, but the sheer reach of the jets shows how easily such an event could be mistaken for an explosion if we did not understand the underlying engine.
Why some physicists now expect real black hole explosions
While supermassive black holes flare and erupt without destroying themselves, a different line of research is asking whether much smaller primordial black holes might eventually do exactly that. A team at the University of Massachusetts Amherst has revisited how these hypothetical relics from the early universe would evaporate through quantum processes and what the final stages would look like. In their analysis, the CNS group argues that if such an object formed with the right mass, its last moments could produce a burst of particles and radiation that would be visible with current or near-future telescopes.
Co-author Michael Baker, an assistant professor of physics, has emphasized that their work rests on a different assumption about how these primordial objects lose mass over time. In a more technical breakdown, the same Michael Baker analysis notes that if a primordial black hole is small enough, its evaporation could accelerate to the point where the final outburst is both brief and extremely bright, a genuine explosion rather than a drawn-out flare. That would not look like the million light year jets of a supermassive giant, but more like a sudden flash, potentially in gamma rays or high-energy particles, that could be picked up as a transient event.
From “once in 100,000 years” to a 90% chance this decade
What makes this theoretical work so provocative is not just the mechanism, but the odds. For decades, many physicists treated black hole explosions as vanishingly rare, perhaps happening only once every 100,000 years within the observable universe. A recent modeling effort has challenged that assumption, arguing that if primordial black holes make up even a small fraction of dark matter, the chance of seeing one explode nearby is much higher. One summary of the new calculation notes that earlier expectations of a 100,000 year timescale may have been far too pessimistic, and that the more mass a primordial black hole loses, the more particles it will emit in its final phase.
In a separate discussion of the same work, Baker has been quoted as saying that there could be a 90% chance that such an explosion occurs within the next decade, while carefully adding that “We are not claiming that it is absolutely going to happen this decade.” That nuanced 90% estimate reflects both the uncertainties in how many primordial black holes exist and the confidence that, if they are out there in the right mass range, their final flashes would be hard to miss. A related overview of the project, framed around the idea that such an event could reveal the foundations of the universe, ties the prediction to broader questions about how the Big Bang unfolded and whether dark matter might partly consist of these ancient remnants.
What an actual black hole blast would reveal
The stakes of catching one of these events are enormous. The same Amherst group has argued that a confirmed detection would not just be a curiosity, but a window into physics at energies far beyond any human-made accelerator. In one account, the Amherst physicists suggest that the particle shower from an exploding primordial black hole could help answer basic questions about where everything came from and how the early universe behaved in its first fractions of a second. A complementary summary of the work, shared through a community of astronomy enthusiasts, highlights how a Physical Review Letters paper from the University of Massachusetts Amherst has pushed this idea from speculation toward a testable prediction.
To appreciate how transformative such a detection would be, it helps to compare it with the most extreme black hole outbursts we already know. Astronomers have watched one feeding event that was about 400 billion times brighter than the Sun, a colossal 400 billion spike in brightness that still left the black hole itself intact. They have also seen a supermassive giant awaken and hurl jets across intergalactic space like a volcano. Yet all of these are powered by matter falling in, not by the black hole evaporating away. A true primordial explosion would flip that script, turning the black hole from a sink into a source and, in the process, testing ideas about quantum gravity that have so far remained entirely theoretical.
More from Morning Overview