Citigroup is racing to retool its workforce for an era in which artificial intelligence is embedded in almost every task, from risk modeling to routine paperwork. The bank is putting AI skills at the center of that shift, retraining 175,000 staff so they can work alongside new systems before those systems reshape their jobs. The scale of the effort signals that one of the world’s biggest financial institutions sees AI not as a side project but as the backbone of its next operating model.
Instead of waiting for automation to quietly erase roles, Citigroup is trying to get ahead of the disruption by turning AI literacy into a baseline requirement. The program is framed less as a coding boot camp and more as a survival kit for knowledge workers whose daily routines are about to be rewritten. How the bank executes on that promise will help define what white-collar work looks like in global finance over the next decade.
The scale of Citigroup’s AI retraining gamble
Citigroup is not dabbling at the margins of AI, it is reorganizing how its people work. The bank has committed to retraining 175,000 employees, a figure that covers almost its entire global workforce and turns AI training into a core requirement rather than an optional perk. Internal programs are focused on teaching staff how to use the bank’s own AI tools, with workers already having entered more than 6.5 million prompts into those systems, according to reporting on Citigroup, Inc. That volume of interaction suggests the tools are not sitting on the shelf, they are being woven into daily workflows.
The decision to make AI training mandatory reflects a belief that the technology will be as fundamental to banking as spreadsheets or email. Citigroup is positioning its internal platforms as the default environment for tasks that used to rely on manual analysis or legacy software, and the retraining program is the bridge between those old habits and a new operating model. The bank’s public-facing materials, including its main site at Citi, emphasize digital transformation and integrated services, and the AI push is the internal counterpart to that strategy. By moving early and at scale, the bank is trying to avoid a split between a small group of AI specialists and a larger workforce left behind.
Jane Fraser’s blunt message on jobs and reinvention
Citigroup’s leadership has been unusually direct about what this transformation means for jobs. Chief executive Jane Fraser has said that AI will “change the nature of what people do every day” and that “it will take some jobs away,” a candid acknowledgment that automation will not be painless. Her argument is that the bank has a responsibility to prepare its people for that reality rather than letting them navigate it alone. Reporting on her comments notes that, instead of leaving staff to fend for themselves, executives mandated that they lean into AI training so they can adapt as roles evolve, as detailed in coverage of how Instead of letting change happen to them.
Fraser has also framed AI as a tool that will reshape life as well as work, not just a way to cut costs. In her view, the technology can strip out drudgery, speed up complex analysis, and open up new types of client service, but only if employees are confident using it. That is why the training program is pitched as a chance to “reinvent themselves” before their roles are permanently altered, a theme echoed in reporting that describes how Citigroup is preparing staff for a future in which AI may know more about their jobs than they do. I see that as a rare moment of honesty in corporate messaging, but it also raises the stakes: if the training falls short, employees will have taken on the burden of adaptation without real protection.
Inside the mandatory AI curriculum
The retraining push is not a loose collection of optional webinars, it is a structured curriculum that Citigroup has made compulsory. Internal communications describe a program that walks employees through the bank’s AI platforms, from basic prompt writing to more advanced use cases like generating draft credit memos or summarizing regulatory changes. The initiative is framed as a “new way of working,” with the bank’s head of technology and business enablement highlighting that AI will be embedded in everyday processes, according to reporting that lays out the Key Takeaways from the rollout.
By making the training mandatory for all staff, Citi is trying to avoid a two-tier culture where only early adopters benefit from AI productivity gains. The curriculum is also designed to be role specific, so a relationship manager, a risk analyst, and a back-office operations specialist each see examples that match their daily tasks. That approach aligns with the bank’s broader technology roadmap, which includes modernizing legacy systems and embedding generative models into customer and internal applications, as described in reporting on Citi and its generative AI playbook. In practice, that means the training is not abstract; it is a guided tour of tools that employees are expected to use immediately.
How AI is already changing work inside the bank
Even before the full retraining program is complete, AI is already reshaping how work gets done at Citigroup. Generative tools are being used to draft internal documents, summarize long email threads, and pull key data from complex reports, which can then be reviewed and edited by human staff. In technology and operations, AI is helping modernize legacy platforms that support critical back-end functions, a shift that reduces the need for manual maintenance and allows teams to focus on higher value projects, according to analysis of how Citi is deploying generative models across its stack.
Customer facing roles are also changing. AI tools can propose draft responses to client queries, flag unusual account activity for further review, and suggest tailored product options based on a customer’s profile. The human banker still makes the final call, but the starting point is increasingly shaped by algorithms rather than a blank screen. Experts who have examined the retraining effort describe it as a “great democratization” of AI skills, with staff across functions learning to use the same core tools, according to coverage of how Experts see the cultural shift. From my perspective, that shared toolkit could break down some of the silos that have long defined big banks, but it also means that performance expectations will rise as AI makes certain tasks faster.
Financial stakes: why AI matters to Citigroup’s bottom line
Citigroup’s AI push is not just about staying fashionable in tech circles, it is tied directly to financial performance. The bank’s net income for the twelve months ending December 31, 2025 was $13.705 billion, a 19.61% increase year over year, according to historical data on Citigroup. Management has been clear that efficiency gains, cost controls, and technology investments are central to sustaining that trajectory in a highly regulated, low margin industry. AI is expected to help by reducing manual processing, cutting error rates, and speeding up decision making in areas like credit underwriting and compliance.
Investors are watching closely to see whether those promises translate into sustained returns. Citigroup Inc trades on the NYSE under the ticker C, with a recent Close of 114.79, a move of 0.03 or 0.03% on the Day, and a 52 week range between 55.51 and 124.17. Those figures capture how the market is valuing the bank’s prospects as it navigates restructuring, regulatory pressure, and technological change. In that context, the AI retraining program is not a side project; it is part of the story investors are buying or selling when they trade the stock.
Culture shock: turning a global bank into an AI-first workplace
Transforming a sprawling institution into an AI fluent organization is as much a cultural challenge as a technical one. Citigroup’s workforce spans trading floors, call centers, compliance teams, and branch networks, each with its own habits and risk tolerance. Mandating AI training for all staff is an attempt to create a shared baseline of skills and expectations, but it also forces people to confront the possibility that the tools they are learning could eventually automate parts of their role. Reporting on the retraining effort notes that Fortune the democratization of AI skills is a major cultural shift in banking and other white collar industries, precisely because it touches so many different job families at once.
From what I can see, Citigroup is trying to manage that shock by emphasizing empowerment rather than replacement. The messaging around the program stresses that AI will handle repetitive tasks so employees can focus on more complex, judgment driven work, and that those who embrace the tools will be better positioned for future roles. At the same time, Fraser’s acknowledgment that some jobs will disappear keeps the conversation grounded in reality. That tension, between opportunity and risk, is likely playing out in team meetings and performance reviews as managers decide how to evaluate staff in an AI augmented environment.
Risk, regulation, and why training matters for safety
In a heavily regulated sector like banking, AI is not just a productivity tool, it is a potential source of new risks. Models that generate text or make recommendations can hallucinate, embed bias, or mishandle sensitive data if they are not carefully designed and monitored. That is one reason Citigroup is focusing its training on internal systems rather than generic public tools, and why it is emphasizing responsible use in addition to technical skills. The bank’s own digital platforms, highlighted on its main Citigroup site, are built to operate within strict security and compliance frameworks, and employees are being taught how to stay within those guardrails.
Training also matters because regulators will expect banks to demonstrate that staff understand the limits of AI. If a model suggests a credit decision or flags a suspicious transaction, a human still needs to apply judgment and document why they agreed or disagreed. By educating 175,000 employees on how to interpret AI outputs, Citigroup is building a first line of defense against misuse and regulatory breaches. In my view, that is not just good governance, it is self preservation: a single high profile failure involving AI could trigger scrutiny that slows down innovation across the firm.
What Citigroup’s move signals for white-collar workers
Citigroup’s retraining program is a bellwether for white collar work far beyond Wall Street. When a bank of this size decides that every employee needs AI skills, it sends a signal to other large employers that basic digital literacy is no longer enough. The message is that knowledge workers must be able to collaborate with algorithms, not just use standard office software. That shift is likely to influence hiring criteria, promotion paths, and even university curricula, as students and mid career professionals try to match what employers now expect.
At the same time, the program highlights the uneven power dynamics of this transition. Employees are being asked to learn tools that could eventually automate parts of their job, with no guarantee of long term security. Yet opting out is not really an option if AI becomes embedded in core processes. I see Citigroup’s approach as a pragmatic response to that dilemma: give people the skills to adapt and be transparent that some roles will change or disappear. For workers across the economy, the lesson is clear. Waiting for AI to settle down before engaging with it is no longer a viable strategy.
Markets, data, and the new literacy of finance
AI is arriving in a financial world already saturated with data, from real time market feeds to complex risk models. Tools like Google Finance have long made it easy for retail investors to track securities, currencies, and indexes, and institutional players operate with even richer datasets. What is changing now is the ability of generative models to interpret that information, summarize it, and surface patterns that would have taken analysts hours or days to find. Citigroup’s training program is effectively teaching its staff a new literacy: how to ask the right questions of AI systems and how to judge the answers.
More from Morning Overview