Chinese researchers say they can now turn waste carbon dioxide into edible starch in a steel tank, and they claim it is roughly ten times more productive than growing corn in a field. If the numbers hold up outside the lab, that shift in productivity could redraw the map of global agriculture, food security and climate policy in a single stroke.
Instead of relying on sunlight, soil and rain, the new system uses engineered enzymes and controlled chemistry to assemble starch molecule by molecule. I see it as part of a broader race to uncouple food production from farmland, with China betting that industrial bioreactors can do what traditional crops do, only faster and with far less strain on land and water.
From photosynthesis to factory line
At the heart of this story is a simple but radical idea: replace the messy elegance of photosynthesis with a clean industrial pipeline. Plants build starch slowly, converting light and carbon dioxide into sugars through a maze of reactions that waste a lot of energy, a point that Chinese scientists have stressed when describing how Plants create carbohydrates. In the new system, carbon dioxide is captured and fed into a sequence of catalysts and enzymes that assemble starch directly, skipping the leaf, stem and root entirely.
According to researchers at the Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, part of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the latest version of this process delivers a roughly 10x jump in productivity compared with corn-based starch production, a claim that has been highlighted as a potential way to cut the land and water footprint of staple crops in Feat. I read that as a direct challenge to the assumption that fields are the only economical way to make basic calories at scale.
A breakthrough years in the making
The apparent overnight leap to a tenfold gain actually rests on years of incremental work. Back in 2021, Chinese teams reported a global first, using a chemoenzymatic system called ASAP to synthesize starch from carbon dioxide in a lab setting, with spatial and temporal segregation of reactions that allowed hydrogen to drive the conversion at a rate that already outpaced natural crops, as detailed in early ASAP reports. Around the same time, Ma Yanhe, the director of the Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, framed the goal bluntly, saying the ambition was to mimic what plants do but do it much faster, a vision that has guided the institute’s work on synthetic starch since those early Chinese announcements.
Independent analyses at the time suggested that even the first-generation system could already be 8.5 times more efficient than conventional agriculture at turning carbon dioxide into starch, with one assessment describing an efficiency that was exactly 8.5-fold higher than maize. Researchers under the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Tianjin argued that, in principle, annual starch output from such artificial systems could exceed global corn production if energy inputs were solved, a point they made when explaining how Researchers saw the technology scaling. I see the new 10x claim as the latest rung on that ladder rather than a sudden, isolated jump.
Inside the 10x productivity claim
The current iteration of the process is described as an enzymatic assembly line that turns purified carbon dioxide into starch granules in a controlled reactor, with each step tuned for speed and yield. Technical writeups emphasize that the system is lab based and relies on a carefully designed enzyme cocktail, and they frame the 10x figure as a comparison to the rate at which corn fields produce starch per unit of input, a contrast that has been highlighted in coverage of 10x improvement. In practical terms, that means a smaller footprint for the same tonnage of starch, at least on paper.
Researchers at the Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology say they have significantly improved the activity of key enzymes since the 2021 prototype, with one scientist, Cai, explaining that the catalytic performance has been boosted compared with the earlier system and that this is central to the new gains in carbon dioxide bioconversion, a point underscored when Currently reported on Cai’s comments to China Science Daily. I read that as a reminder that the headline number is not magic, it is the cumulative result of enzyme engineering, reactor design and process integration.
Food security, climate and China’s strategic bet
For Beijing, the appeal of this technology is obvious: it promises a way to turn a climate liability into a food asset while easing pressure on farmland. Analysts have noted that scientists in China see the ability to make starch directly from carbon dioxide as a potential tool to ease food shortages and support a carbon neutral bioeconomy, especially if the process can be powered by low carbon energy, a vision that was already present when early Starch assessments linked synthetic routes to climate goals. In that framing, every ton of starch made in a reactor is a ton that does not require irrigation, fertilizer or deforestation.
The geopolitical context matters too. Commentators on scientific forums have described the work by the Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology at the Chinese Academy of Sciences as a breakthrough that could change how food is produced, because it does not depend on traditional agriculture or vast farmland, a point that has been widely shared in Science focused discussions. I see that as part of a broader Chinese strategy to secure staple supplies at home while potentially exporting the underlying reactors and enzyme kits abroad.
From lab bench to industrial tanks
For all the excitement, the system is still at a laboratory stage, and scaling it will be a brutal engineering challenge. Reports from North China describe how the team in Tianjin is now working in a dedicated lab in North China’s Tianjin to move from proof of concept to pilot scale, with video footage showing reactors and control systems that hint at the complexity of industrial deployment, as seen in coverage of work in North China. To compete with global corn and cassava, they will need not just high yields but cheap enzymes, robust reactors and a reliable stream of low cost carbon dioxide.
Technical explainers stress that the process is enzymatic rather than purely chemical, which means it depends on biological catalysts that can be sensitive to temperature, impurities and mechanical stress, a point that is clear in descriptions of the new Carbon based route. At the same time, mainstream coverage of the latest announcement has framed it as a feat that could pave the way for industrial starch production without relying on water and land intensive corn, a prospect that has been highlighted in Researchers summaries and in more detailed Cai interviews. I see the next few years as a test of whether that promise can survive contact with the messy realities of industrial chemistry and global commodity markets.
More from Morning Overview