China’s race to build its own high-end chips is entering a more aggressive phase, with Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation moving to close the gap with Nvidia just as Huawei sharpens its own challenge in artificial intelligence hardware. The contest is no longer only about catching up on technology nodes, it is about whether China can assemble a full-stack ecosystem that can rival the world’s dominant AI chip supplier while navigating export controls and geopolitical pressure.
SMIC is emerging as the state-backed workhorse of this effort, tasked with pushing advanced manufacturing even as costs soar, while Huawei positions itself as the systems integrator that can turn domestic silicon into real computing power. I see the dynamic as a three-way tension: Nvidia still sets the global benchmark, SMIC is trying to match the manufacturing playbook, and Huawei is racing to prove that Chinese platforms can stand on their own.
SMIC’s 5 nm push and the cost of catching up
SMIC’s reported progress toward 5 nanometer production is the clearest sign yet that Beijing is willing to pay a premium to narrow the technology gap. Industry chatter indicates that “SMIC Is Rumored To Complete 5nm Chip Development By 2025,” with “Chip Development By” that point coming at a steep price, as “Costs Could Be Up To” “50 Percent” “Higher Than TSMC” because of weak yields and less mature tooling, according to one detailed account of how far the foundry is stretching to reach that node SMIC Is Rumored To Complete. I read that as a signal that China is prepared to sacrifice near-term efficiency for strategic control over its most advanced manufacturing steps.
A separate assessment reinforces that trajectory, describing how “SMIC Reportedly On Track” to “Finalize” a 5 nm “Process” in 2025 and “Projected” to face a cost penalty of “40” to “50%” compared with an equivalent line at TSMC, at least for mass production Reportedly On Track. Those figures underscore how sanctions and equipment constraints are translating directly into higher capital intensity and lower yield, yet they also show that SMIC is not standing still at older nodes. In practice, any 5 nm capacity, even at a premium, gives Chinese chip designers a domestic option for more powerful AI accelerators and networking silicon.
Policy tailwinds: SMIC as the core beneficiary of self-sufficiency
SMIC’s willingness to shoulder those costs is easier to understand when viewed through the lens of industrial policy. The company has been cast as the “Core Beneficiary of China” in a broader “Semiconductor Self” “Sufficiency Agenda Since the US” began tightening export controls on advanced tools and design support, with “Chi” authorities backing the foundry through policy, subsidies, and financing that cushion the blow of expensive process development Core Beneficiary of China. I see that positioning as a deliberate choice to make SMIC the anchor of a domestic supply chain that can withstand future shocks.
That same policy framework is shaped by a strategic rivalry with the “United States,” where a detailed “China” policy playbook calls for Washington to “more aggressively” counter Beijing’s efforts to surpass American AI capabilities and to shift from a reactive “violation response” to a more proactive enforcement posture on technology controls A Playbook for Winning the AI Race. In that context, SMIC’s 5 nm ambitions are not just a business decision, they are a response to a tightening regulatory perimeter that is designed to keep China away from the very tools it needs to compete with Nvidia at the cutting edge.
Nvidia’s towering lead in AI chips
Even as SMIC inches toward 5 nm, Nvidia’s financial and technological lead in AI accelerators remains enormous. The company’s latest earnings detail how “NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for Third Quarter Fiscal” 2026 with record revenue of “$57.0 billion” and a breakdown that highlights the scale of its “Non” “GAAP” profitability, as well as a massive share repurchase authorization that reflects management’s confidence in sustained demand for its data center GPUs NVIDIA Announces Financial Results for Third Quarter Fiscal. Those numbers are a reminder that Nvidia is not just a chip designer, it is the central infrastructure provider for the current AI boom.
Market data platforms such as Google Finance help illustrate how that revenue power translates into market capitalization and investor expectations, with Nvidia’s valuation reflecting a belief that its GPUs will remain indispensable for training and inference workloads. From my perspective, this is the benchmark SMIC and Huawei are ultimately measured against: not only whether they can fabricate or design competitive chips, but whether they can build an ecosystem of software, customers, and capital markets support that rivals Nvidia’s entrenched position.
Huawei’s AI hardware surge and Nvidia’s acknowledgment
On the demand side of China’s chip story, Huawei has become the most visible challenger to Nvidia in AI computing. The company has rolled out large-scale AI cluster systems based on its own Ascend processors, and “Nvidia” has publicly conceded that competition has “undeniably arrived” after “Huawei” launched an AI cluster that targets the same high performance computing workloads as Nvidia’s latest RTX and Blackwell platforms, with research firm SemiAnalysis noting how Chinese cloud players such as ByteDance are already testing these alternatives Nvidia acknowledges Huawei challenge. I read that acknowledgment as a turning point, where Nvidia no longer sees Chinese rivals as distant followers but as credible competitors in at least part of the market.
Huawei is not just designing chips, it is pitching a full computing stack that leans on its legacy strengths. Company executives have described how “Huawei” is “leveraging its strengths in networking, along with China’s advantages in power supply, to aggressively push” new chipmaking and computing power plans, positioning “China” as a base for dense, power efficient AI data centers that can run on domestic hardware Huawei is leveraging its strengths. In practice, that means Huawei is trying to do for Chinese AI infrastructure what Nvidia did globally: bundle silicon, networking, and software into a coherent platform that developers can trust.
Filling the Nvidia void inside China
Huawei’s rise is inseparable from the vacuum left by U.S. export controls on advanced Nvidia GPUs. As Washington tightened restrictions, Chinese firms scrambled to source alternatives, and “How China” is responding has become a case study in rapid industrial substitution, with domestic vendors racing to fill the “Nvidia” gap in data centers and edge deployments as “Why Washington” acted “Prompted” by concerns that cutting edge GPUs could accelerate military AI applications How China is filling the Nvidia void. In that environment, Huawei’s Ascend 910B and 910C chips have been framed as the flagship domestic response, with the company working hand in hand with local supply chains to scale production.
That shift is not just about one company. The same reporting highlights “Huawei leading China’s self-sufficiency in AI chips, GPUs,” but also points to a broader ecosystem of startups and state backed projects that are trying to ensure Chinese cloud providers are not left stranded without high performance accelerators Huawei leading China’s self-sufficiency. I see SMIC’s manufacturing push and Huawei’s system level ambitions as two halves of the same strategy: one builds the fabs, the other fills them with designs that can keep domestic AI projects moving even if Nvidia hardware is off the table.
China’s AI chip output and the risk of oversupply
There is a paradox at the heart of China’s AI chip drive. On one hand, the country is racing to replace Nvidia hardware in domestic data centers, on the other, its own production capacity could soon exceed what local customers can absorb. “Dec” remarks from “While” speaking at the “Center for Strategic and International Studies” in “Washington,” “NVIDIA” chief executive “Jensen Huang” noted that China’s AI chip output is expected to “far exceed domestic demand,” warning that a surplus of accelerators could push Chinese vendors to look abroad for customers and to “go compete for it” in global markets China AI chip output. That comment captures the long term competitive threat: once China has enough chips for itself, it will export the excess.
From my vantage point, that prospect raises two questions. First, can SMIC and its peers reach cost and yield levels that make their chips attractive outside China, given the “40” to “50%” cost penalties cited for 5 nm processes. Second, will export controls extend to secondary markets where Chinese accelerators might undercut Nvidia on price. If Chinese AI chipmakers are forced to sell primarily at home, oversupply could compress margins and slow reinvestment, but if they are allowed to sell abroad, Nvidia will face a new wave of competition in regions that are less aligned with U.S. policy.
Nvidia’s regulatory navigation and the Blackwell pivot
For now, Nvidia is trying to thread the needle between regulatory limits and market demand in China. The company has already tailored specific products to comply with U.S. export rules, and “Yet” “NVIDIA’s” ability to adapt its offerings to different regulatory landscapes “underscores why it remains the global leader,” as seen in plans for a new Blackwell based chip for China that may “outpace” the earlier H20 model in performance while still fitting within the letter of export controls Yet, NVIDIA. I interpret that strategy as Nvidia’s attempt to stay embedded in the Chinese market without crossing the red lines set in Washington.
That balancing act matters because, even with Huawei and SMIC advancing, Chinese cloud providers still prefer Nvidia hardware where they can get it, given its mature software stack and global developer base. If Nvidia can keep shipping slightly detuned Blackwell parts into China, it will slow the shift toward domestic accelerators and give the company more time to consolidate its lead elsewhere. At the same time, every new regulatory tweak that tightens the screws will push more customers into Huawei’s orbit and give SMIC more volume to justify its expensive 5 nm ramp.
What it takes for SMIC to truly chase Nvidia
When I weigh all these strands together, SMIC’s pursuit of Nvidia looks less like a straight race and more like a relay. The foundry is racing to prove it can reliably manufacture at 5 nm despite “Costs Could Be Up To” “50 Percent” “Higher Than TSMC,” while Huawei and other chip designers sprint to fill that capacity with competitive AI products Costs Could Be Up To. Success will depend not only on process technology, but on whether Chinese vendors can match Nvidia’s software ecosystem, from CUDA like frameworks to optimized libraries for training large language models.
Financial muscle will also be decisive. Nvidia’s “Non” “GAAP” margins and “$57.0 billion” revenue base give it room to invest in new architectures, software, and developer outreach at a scale SMIC cannot match on its own Non GAAP. That is why Beijing’s subsidies and the “Semiconductor Self” “Sufficiency Agenda Since the US” restrictions are so central: they are effectively substituting state capital for the cash flows Nvidia generates from global markets. Whether that is enough to sustain a long term challenge will shape not just the future of AI hardware, but the balance of technological power between China and the United States.
More from MorningOverview