The United States’ reusable X-37B spaceplane has long been shrouded in secrecy, but Chinese military analysts have now elevated it in their threat hierarchy, describing it as a potential space-based bomber that could strike from orbit with little warning. That label reflects more than rhetorical posturing: it captures Beijing’s growing anxiety that a small, robotic vehicle circling high above the atmosphere could quietly rewrite the rules of deterrence and vulnerability in space. As Washington celebrates the X-37B’s technical milestones, Chinese researchers are publicly sketching out scenarios in which the same craft becomes a precision “space killer” aimed at their satellites and strategic infrastructure.
Why Beijing now talks about a “space bomber”
When Chinese strategists call the X-37B a space bomber, they are signaling that they see it as more strategically disruptive than traditional symbols of U.S. power such as aircraft carriers or fifth-generation fighters. In their view, a reusable orbital vehicle that can loiter for months, maneuver unpredictably, and reenter on demand offers a qualitatively different way to threaten targets, both in space and potentially on the ground. Chinese commentary has framed the craft as a platform that could bypass missile defenses and compress warning times to minutes, which is why some analysts argue that Beijing now treats it as a higher priority concern than the F-35 or even carrier strike groups, a judgment reflected in assessments that explicitly describe how China “thinks the X-37B is a space bomber” and a top-tier strategic challenge.
That language is not just colorful metaphor, it is rooted in specific fears about payloads and mission profiles that the United States has never fully disclosed. Chinese military researchers have publicly speculated that the vehicle could carry precision-guided munitions or other offensive systems, and they have warned that its ability to change orbit and revisit targets could make it an ideal tool for surprise strikes. In their writings, the X-37B is portrayed as a dual-use asset that blurs the line between experimental testbed and operational strike platform, a perception that helps explain why some Chinese generals reportedly “sweat” over its potential to undermine their assumptions about strategic stability.
Inside the X-37B’s secretive mission profile
From the U.S. side, the X-37B is officially described as an Orbital Test Vehicle, a reusable platform for experimenting with new space technologies, materials, and payloads. The U.S. Space Force has highlighted its role in testing advanced thermal protection systems, autonomous reentry, and on-orbit operations, and it recently announced that the vehicle had concluded its seventh successful mission after spending an extended period in space. That mission record underscores how the craft has evolved from a proof-of-concept into a workhorse for classified experiments, with each flight lasting longer and involving more complex orbital maneuvers, even as officials continue to emphasize its status as a test asset rather than a weapon.
Yet the very features that make the X-37B a flexible test platform are the same ones that alarm foreign observers. The vehicle can stay in orbit for hundreds of days, adjust its trajectory, and return to a runway landing, all while carrying an internal payload bay whose contents are rarely disclosed. Analysts have noted that the craft has “broken all the rules” of traditional satellite behavior by shifting orbits in ways that are difficult to predict, which complicates tracking and raises questions about what it might be doing near other objects in space. For Chinese planners, that combination of endurance, maneuverability, and secrecy looks less like a benign laboratory and more like a prototype for a future operational system that could be rapidly weaponized.
Chinese researchers’ warnings about orbital strike potential
Chinese military-affiliated researchers have gone further than general suspicion, publishing detailed warnings that the X-37B could be armed to “kill in orbit.” In their technical analyses, they outline scenarios in which the spaceplane carries anti-satellite weapons, kinetic projectiles, or other payloads designed to disable or destroy spacecraft that are critical to China’s communications, navigation, and early warning networks. These studies argue that the vehicle’s ability to approach targets from unusual angles and altitudes would make it difficult for existing sensors to detect an impending attack, which in turn could erode confidence in the survivability of Chinese space assets during a crisis.
Some of those warnings have filtered into more popular science and defense coverage inside China, where the X-37B is increasingly described as a “space killer” that could threaten satellites or even deliver strikes against ground targets from orbit. Commentators have pointed to its classified payloads and long-duration flights as evidence that the United States is at least exploring offensive options, even if Washington has not acknowledged any such mission. That narrative has been amplified by international reporting that highlights how Chinese experts are sounding the alarm about a U.S. spaceplane they believe could be turned into a precision orbital weapon, reinforcing the perception that the craft is already part of a broader competition over space control.
What the U.S. officially says the X-37B is for
U.S. officials, for their part, have consistently framed the X-37B as a technology demonstrator focused on experimentation rather than combat. The U.S. Space Force has emphasized that its seventh mission tested new on-orbit capabilities, hosted experiments for other government agencies, and validated reusable spaceplane operations, all under the umbrella of advancing national security space technology. Public statements stress that the program is about learning how to operate reusable vehicles, improve space domain awareness, and support scientific research, with no explicit mention of weaponization or strike missions.
That messaging is reinforced by earlier descriptions of the program that highlighted its origins as a NASA and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency initiative to explore reusable spacecraft concepts. Past reporting has noted that the vehicle’s flights have included experiments on materials exposure, satellite deployment, and autonomous guidance, painting a picture of a versatile but fundamentally experimental platform. At the same time, the Pentagon has been careful not to disclose full payload manifests or detailed orbital tracks, a level of secrecy that fuels speculation abroad even as official narratives continue to stress testing and research as the primary purpose.
How long-duration missions feed Chinese anxiety
The X-37B’s mission history is central to why Chinese analysts now treat it as a potential space bomber rather than a mere curiosity. Over successive flights, the vehicle has steadily extended its time in orbit, with missions lasting hundreds of days and setting new endurance records for reusable spacecraft. The U.S. Space Force’s announcement that the Orbital Test Vehicle had completed its seventh mission underscored that this is no longer an experimental one-off but a mature system capable of repeated, long-duration deployments, a fact that foreign militaries cannot ignore when they assess its potential roles.
Those long missions also provide ample opportunity to test payloads that might never be publicly acknowledged. Earlier coverage of the program has described how the X-37B has already spent well over a year in space on some flights, conducting classified experiments and returning data that only a small circle of officials sees. Chinese observers interpret that pattern as evidence that the United States is refining operational concepts for reusable spaceplanes, including how they might be used in conflict. The more the vehicle demonstrates that it can survive and function in orbit for extended periods, the easier it is for foreign planners to imagine it carrying out persistent surveillance or pre-positioning offensive capabilities above their territory.
Early secrecy and the roots of foreign suspicion
Suspicion about the X-37B did not begin with China’s latest warnings, it has been baked into the program since its earliest flights. When the vehicle first launched, U.S. officials offered only sparse details about its objectives, and outside analysts were left to infer its activities from orbital tracking and occasional hints about experiments. Reporting from that period highlighted how little was known about the craft’s payloads and mission profiles, noting that even basic questions about what it was doing in space went unanswered, which naturally invited speculation about military applications.
As the program matured, that aura of secrecy persisted, even as the Pentagon acknowledged more about its reusable design and testing goals. Coverage from the early 2010s described the X-37B as a top-secret spaceplane whose classified missions were raising eyebrows among foreign governments and arms control advocates. The lack of transparency around its capabilities and intent created a vacuum that rivals were quick to fill with their own worst-case assumptions, laying the groundwork for today’s Chinese narrative that treats the craft as a potential orbital bomber rather than a neutral testbed.
How analysts debate the “space bomber” label
Outside government, defense analysts are divided over whether the X-37B should truly be seen as a space bomber or as something more mundane. Some argue that its size, payload capacity, and design make it ill-suited for carrying large numbers of weapons, and they suggest that its primary value lies in intelligence gathering, technology demonstration, and perhaps limited anti-satellite roles. Others counter that even a small payload of precision-guided munitions or co-orbital interceptors could have outsized strategic impact, especially if deployed from an unpredictable orbital platform that can reenter with little warning, which is why they believe Russia and China “must fear” its potential even if it is not yet armed.
That debate reflects a broader uncertainty about how reusable spaceplanes will fit into future military doctrine. Some experts see them as niche assets that complement traditional satellites and missiles, while others envision them as precursors to a new class of orbital strike systems that could blur the line between air and space power. The X-37B sits at the center of that argument, serving as a real-world test case that informs both optimistic and alarmist scenarios. For Chinese strategists who already view the craft as a space bomber, the mere possibility that it could be adapted for offensive missions is enough to justify planning for the worst.
Technical features that look like weapons to Beijing
From a technical standpoint, several features of the X-37B stand out to Chinese observers as inherently dual-use. The vehicle’s ability to change orbit, rendezvous with other objects, and reenter on command gives it a flexibility that traditional satellites lack, and those same capabilities could be repurposed for offensive tasks such as inspecting, disabling, or even capturing foreign spacecraft. Its internal payload bay, while modest in size, can host a variety of instruments or devices, and foreign analysts have speculated that it could carry small satellites, robotic arms, or other systems that might be used in ways that cross the line from peaceful to hostile.
Public science and technology coverage has underscored how little is known about the exact configuration of the X-37B’s payloads, even as it has become one of the most talked-about “top-secret” spacecraft in the world. Detailed explainers have walked through its dimensions, launch vehicles, and reentry profile, but they also stress that the classified nature of its missions leaves many questions unanswered about what it actually does on orbit. For Chinese military planners, that ambiguity is itself a risk factor, since it forces them to assume that any advanced maneuvering or proximity operations they observe could be part of a broader effort to develop space control or strike capabilities.
What comes next: OTV-8 and the future of orbital power
The trajectory of the X-37B program suggests that its role in U.S. space strategy is only growing, which in turn will shape how China and other rivals respond. The Pentagon has already prepared for an eighth mission, designated OTV-8, that is expected to build on the lessons of previous flights and test new technologies relevant to both civil and military space operations. Reporting on that upcoming launch has noted that the mission will likely involve more complex experiments and potentially new orbits, reinforcing the impression that the United States sees reusable spaceplanes as a key part of its future in orbit.
For Beijing, each new mission is another data point in a trend that points toward more capable and versatile orbital vehicles, and that is why Chinese researchers are sharpening their rhetoric about the X-37B as a potential space bomber. As the craft’s flight history lengthens and its technical sophistication grows, the gap between U.S. assurances of benign intent and foreign fears of weaponization is likely to widen. I see that divergence as a warning sign: unless there is greater transparency or new norms around reusable military spaceplanes, the X-37B will continue to be viewed in China less as a test vehicle and more as a prototype for a future era in which bombers may orbit silently above the atmosphere, waiting for a conflict that everyone claims to want to avoid.
More from MorningOverview