In northern Egypt, a vast hollow in the desert sits far below sea level, inviting a question that sounds like science fiction: what if the Mediterranean were allowed to pour in. The idea is to carve a new inland sea in the Sahara and lock away part of the rising ocean, turning a climate threat into a colossal piece of infrastructure.
Proponents argue that flooding this basin with seawater could generate hydropower, reshape regional development and, at least symbolically, push back against sea level rise. Critics counter that the physics, costs and ecological risks make it less a climate solution than a thought experiment on a continental scale.
The desert basin that could become a new sea
The starting point for this vision is geography. The Qattara Depression in Egypt’s Western Desert is a natural bowl that lies around 60 metres, 200 feet below sea level on average, stretching across a largely uninhabited expanse of rock, sand and salt flats. Because it already sits beneath the level of the Mediterranean, engineers have long noted that gravity would do much of the work if a channel were ever cut from the coast.
That physical quirk has turned the depression into a recurring canvas for grand schemes. The Qattara Depression is often described as the third largest such basin on Earth, and tourism promoters note that The Qattara Depression has already inspired a project to study large scale hydropower, although that work has not yet been completed. For planners in Cairo, the emptiness of the area is part of the appeal: a new body of water could be created without displacing major cities or farmland.
A Cold War dream with nuclear overtones
The notion of turning this hollow into a sea is not new. In the 1950s, the American Central Intelligence Agency floated a proposal to President Dwight Eisenhower that framed the Qattara Depression Project as a way to stabilize the Middle East by creating jobs and infrastructure around a new inland sea. The idea, described in historical accounts of the Qattara Depression Project, was to cut a canal from the Mediterranean, let seawater rush in and then harvest the resulting hydropower as the basin filled.
Some of the more extreme variants of that era went further, suggesting that nuclear explosives could be used to blast the canal through the desert plateau. A survey of visionary megaprojects notes that one construction plan for the Qattara involved nuclear bombs, echoing other schemes in which Atomic devices under The Plowshare Program of the United States Atomic Energy Commissio were pitched as tools for reshaping landscapes in the Sahara. Those nuclear excavation concepts, recalled in a review of Atomic projects, were ultimately abandoned as too risky and politically toxic.
From megaproject fantasy to climate proposal
What has revived interest today is not Cold War geopolitics but climate anxiety. As seas creep higher, a new generation of researchers and futurists has begun to ask whether inland depressions like Qattara could act as giant sumps for excess seawater. One recent concept, sometimes referred to as Project Endor, explicitly aims to lower sea levels by storing ocean water in the Qattara Depression, treating the basin as a vast reservoir carved by nature rather than by dams.
In a video explainer, the creators of Project Endor describe channeling seawater inland as a macro engineering response to climate change, one that could, in theory, be replicated in other low lying basins. Academic work has picked up the same thread, with one chapter on mapping the Qattara Depression noting that there is Recently a serious concern to use the basin as a discharge point for extra ocean water possibly resulting from Earth’s climate change, an idea explored in detail using satellite elevation data for the Qattara Depression.
The modern plan: an 80 km tunnel and a “Qattara Sea”
In its most current form, the proposal reads like a national infrastructure blueprint. Advocates describe Egypt building an 80 km tunnel or canal from the Mediterranean coast, allowing seawater to flow downhill into the desert. As the water pours into the depression, it would form a new inland sea, often dubbed the Qattara Sea, whose surface would sit below the Mediterranean and whose outflow could be harnessed for continuous hydropower.
One recent climate focused analysis describes Channeling the Mediterranean Sea into the Qattara Depression to create the Qattara Sea, a new inland sea that would both generate electricity and store seawater. That vision, laid out in a discussion of using seawater to reflood inland depressions, frames the project as a radical climate proposal rather than a conventional dam, arguing that a controlled inflow from the coast could be tuned to balance evaporation, power production and long term storage of ocean water in the Qattara Depression.
How much sea level could it really absorb
The climate case for such a project hinges on scale. Enthusiasts sometimes talk about “trillions of cubic meters” of seawater being locked away in the desert, but even generous estimates show that the effect on global sea level would be modest. One back of the envelope calculation shared by geography enthusiasts suggests that the depression could hold around 1200 cubic kilometers of water if totally filled, while The Mediterranean Sea holds more than a million cubic kilometers, meaning that even a fully flooded basin would shave only a tiny fraction off global oceans.
That perspective, discussed in a thread asking why Egypt never proceeded with the Qattara scheme, underscores that the project would have more symbolic than planetary impact on sea level. In that same conversation, a commenter notes that if you are filling it with sea water, the salinity would start at ocean levels and then rise as evaporation concentrates the salt, a process that would further limit how much additional water could be added over time. Those concerns about rising salinity and limited climate benefit are laid out in detail in a Mar discussion of the basin’s capacity and in a companion comment that warns that if you are filling land with sea water, unfortunately the salinity will only intensify, a point made explicitly in another Mar exchange.
Hydropower promise and the lure of “eternal” energy
Even if the sea level benefit is small, the hydropower potential is central to the pitch. Because the depression sits so far below the Mediterranean, water flowing through a tunnel or canal could drive turbines on its way down, then continue to generate electricity as evaporation from the new sea pulls more water inland to replace what is lost. Supporters describe this as a kind of perpetual cascade, with the height difference between the coast and the basin acting as a natural dam without the need to block a river.
Popular science coverage of the idea notes that few people live in the Qattara, so politically it is seen as more feasible than flooding a populated valley, but it also stresses that the biggest problem is the sheer scale of construction required. One overview of world changing megaprojects points out that the Qattara concept would demand enormous earthworks and that one historical construction plan even involved nuclear bombs, a reminder of how extreme some of the earlier proposals were for the Few inhabited depression.
The hard limits: cost, engineering and aquifers
When I look past the renderings, the engineering ledger is brutal. To move seawater inland at the volumes envisioned, Egypt would need not only an 80 kilometer conduit but also massive intake structures, pumping stations and grid connections, all in a harsh desert where summer heat easily exceeds 45 degrees Celsius. A technical discussion among Earth science specialists frames the central question bluntly as “Will cost exceed benefit,” arguing that any realistic assessment of pumping ocean water into desert areas must weigh construction, maintenance and energy use against the relatively small reduction in sea level that would result from filling the Scientific Qattara Depression Project.
There is also a hidden hydrological risk. The Qattara is connected to the Sand Stone Nubian Aquifer, described as the largest source of groundwater in the Western Desert, which currently supplies fresh water to communities and oases. A detailed explainer on the Qattara Depression warns that flooding the basin with seawater could contaminate this aquifer, effectively salting a critical freshwater reserve beneath the Western Desert with salty water. That “harsh reality,” as the video puts it, is laid out in a segment that highlights how the Qattara is hydraulically linked to the Sand Stone Nubian Aquifer, turning what looks like empty land into a far more sensitive system.
Environmental unknowns: salt, climate and new coastlines
Even if engineers could solve the tunneling and aquifer challenges, the environmental consequences of a new inland sea would be profound. As seawater evaporates in the desert heat, salt would accumulate in the basin, potentially creating hypersaline conditions similar to the Dead Sea and altering local climate patterns through increased humidity and cloud formation. Researchers mapping the depression for possible macro projects note that any plan to discharge extra ocean water into the Qattara must grapple with long term changes in regional climate, from temperature and wind to dust transport, as the new water body interacts with the atmosphere over decades.
Climate scientists studying these ideas are cautious. In an interview about whether we can create new inland seas to lower sea level rise, one researcher describes a project that is looking into reflooding the Qattara Depression but stresses that the work is exploratory and that the net climate benefits are uncertain. That conversation, which frames the concept as part of a broader portfolio of geoengineering style responses, underscores that the Qattara is being examined alongside other basins, not as a silver bullet, in a Share on whether new inland seas can meaningfully lower sea level rise.
Why critics call it a mirage
For skeptics, the project’s biggest flaw is not ambition but arithmetic. Online discussions among scientists and engineers repeatedly return to the same conclusion: the complete impractical nature and astronomical costs of building a canal or pipe system, along with the pumps necessary to get ocean water into the desert, swamp any plausible benefit. One widely cited comment on a science forum argues that by the time such a system was built, the amount of sea level rise it could offset would be trivial, especially compared with more direct measures like cutting emissions or protecting vulnerable coasts, a point made sharply in a Oct exchange about how much sea level could be lowered by filling the depression.
Even some of the project’s more sympathetic explainers concede that the numbers are daunting. A recent video titled “Egypt’s Plan to Fill the Sahara With 1.2 Trillion Cubic Meters of” water walks through the scale of excavation, concrete and machinery that would be required, then notes that international climate agreements and environmental scrutiny would subject any such megaproject to intense review. That overview, which situates the Qattara idea among other speculative geoengineering schemes, highlights how a plan to pour seawater into the Sahara would collide with global governance as much as with geology, a tension explored in the Dec presentation.
Between visionary engineering and climate triage
What keeps the Qattara concept alive, despite these obstacles, is a mix of engineering bravado and climate desperation. Macro projects have always appealed to leaders who want to leave a physical legacy, and the image of a new sea in the Sahara, complete with ports, resorts and hydropower stations, is hard to resist. A recent feature on megaprojects that would change the world notes that the Qattara idea persists precisely because it promises to transform an empty desert into a hub of activity, even as it acknowledges that the construction challenges are enormous for the Qattara.
At the same time, technical literature on mapping the depression for hydropower and climate change macro projects shows that serious researchers are at least running the numbers. Using satellite elevation data, one study models how water would spread across the basin and what energy could be extracted, while also flagging the need to consider downstream effects on climate and groundwater. That work, which treats the Qattara as a case study in large scale geoengineering, reflects a broader shift in climate discourse, where ideas that once sounded outlandish are now being examined as part of a spectrum of last resort options for a warming world, a trend visible in the detailed Recently mapping work.
What this bold plan really tells us about climate politics
In the end, the proposal to flood Egypt’s desert with seawater says as much about climate politics as it does about engineering. It reflects a world where incremental measures feel inadequate, where some planners are willing to contemplate reshaping entire regions to buy a few centimeters of sea level relief and a new source of power. The fact that There is already a project studying the possibility of generating electricity from the Qattara depression, even if it has not yet been completed, shows how the line between speculative and serious planning is blurring in the face of rising seas, as noted in the overview of the There project.
Whether the Qattara Sea is ever dug, the debate around it forces a reckoning with scale: how far societies are prepared to go, how much they are willing to spend and what risks they will accept to confront climate change. For now, the plan remains a bold sketch on the edge of the Sahara, a reminder that in a warming century, even the most remote depressions on the map can become arenas for global choices about the future of the oceans and the land.
More from MorningOverview