From canvas biplanes to stealthy jets, air superiority has been defined by a handful of warplanes that forced every rival to rethink how to fight in the sky. I trace 15 of the most iconic fighters and attack aircraft that did not just win battles, they rewrote the rules of aerial combat and reshaped how nations plan for the next war.
Sopwith Camel
The Sopwith Camel was the quintessential First World War dogfighter, and Its agility made it feared over the trenches. With a powerful rotary engine and tight turning radius, the Sopwith Camel could out‑maneuver most contemporaries, a trait credited with tipping local air battles in favor of Allied pilots. Reporting on iconic aircraft notes that Its Sopwith Camel manoeuvrability and powerful rotary engine allowed it to excel in dogfights and support the Royal Flying Corps.
That combination of agility and concentrated firepower set an early template for air superiority fighters. The Camel showed commanders that control of the air could directly influence ground campaigns, pushing militaries to invest in specialized fighter squadrons rather than treating aircraft as mere reconnaissance tools. In many ways, the Camel turned air combat from an experiment into a decisive arm of Military power.
Fokker Triplane
The Fokker Triplane, flown by Manfred von Richthofen, became an icon of World War I and a symbol of how design could amplify a pilot’s skill. Sources describe the Fokker Triplane as the aircraft behind the World War success of Manfred von Richthofen and his Flying Circus, emphasizing its climb rate and agility. That three‑wing layout gave exceptional lift and tight turning performance, ideal for the swirling dogfights of the era.
Although not produced in huge numbers, the Triplane’s psychological impact was outsized. Allied pilots quickly learned to respect its silhouette, and its success pushed designers to experiment aggressively with wing configurations and control surfaces. The aircraft proved that even in a young domain like air combat, incremental engineering advantages could translate into strategic dominance in the skies.
North American P‑51 Mustang
The North American P‑51 Mustang fundamentally changed the air war over Europe in WWII by pairing speed with unprecedented range. One detailed account notes that the North American P‑51D Mustang Enabled Allied heavy bombers to take the fight to the heart of Imperial targets, escorting them deep into hostile territory. Another analysis of air superiority highlights how the Mustang was a long‑range escort fighter that played a decisive role over Europe in WWII and stresses Its speed, range and reliability.
By allowing bomber formations to stay under fighter cover almost all the way to their objectives, the Mustang slashed losses and helped dismantle enemy industry. Its success cemented the idea that strategic bombing campaigns were only viable when paired with true long‑range escorts. That lesson still shapes modern planning for strike packages and tanker support in contested airspace.
North American F‑86 Sabre
The North American F‑86 Sabre brought swept‑wing jet performance into combat and reset expectations for air superiority in the early Cold War. Described as a benchmark fighter, the F‑86 Sabre is credited with helping to ensure air superiority for decades in one influential ranking of the Best Fighter Aircraf. Technical histories of the North American Sabre highlight how the 86 series, including the North American F‑86D Sabre, combined radar, guns and high subsonic speed into a single Heritage design.
In Korea, the Sabre’s duels with MiG‑15s showcased the importance of energy tactics, vertical maneuvering and pilot training in the jet age. Its success pushed air forces to prioritize transonic performance and radar‑guided weapons, laying the groundwork for the missile‑armed interceptors and multirole fighters that followed. The F‑86 also became a prolific export, spreading Western air combat doctrine worldwide.
McDonnell Douglas F‑4 Phantom II
The McDonnell Douglas F‑4 Phantom II was the workhorse that dragged air combat into the Beyond Visual Range era. A detailed technical table on Beyond Visual Range, labeled BVR, The Future, lists the Douglas Phantom II with a top speed of Mach 2.2 and emphasizes its role in long‑range missile engagements. Designed as a fleet defender, the Phantom carried powerful radar and heavy missile loads, reflecting a belief that dogfights were obsolete.
Combat over Vietnam proved that assumption only partly correct, but the F‑4 still transformed tactics. Its BVR capabilities forced adversaries to adapt with better electronic countermeasures and low‑level approaches, while its shortcomings in close combat drove the revival of dogfighting training and gun armament. The Phantom thus became both a symbol of missile‑age ambition and a catalyst for more balanced fighter design.
Mikoyan‑Gurevich MiG‑21
The MiG‑21 distilled supersonic interception into a small, affordable package that reshaped air forces from Asia to Africa. With its delta wing and simple systems, it could be built and maintained in large numbers, giving many states their first taste of true jet‑age air combat. Analyses of historic fighters often place the MiG‑21 alongside Western icons because its performance forced NATO planners to rethink how to protect strike aircraft against massed, fast‑climbing interceptors.
In conflicts from the Middle East to Southeast Asia, the MiG‑21 demonstrated how quantity, ground‑controlled interception and high speed could offset more sophisticated opponents. Its global spread also accelerated the development of counter‑tactics, including look‑down radar, better missiles and electronic warfare pods. The aircraft’s enduring presence underscores how a simple, rugged design can influence strategy for generations.
McDonnell Douglas F‑15 Eagle
The F‑15 Eagle was built around a single promise, to never lose an air‑to‑air fight, and its record has largely borne that out. Historical notes on the Eagle explain that the first F‑15B was delivered to the United States Air Force in the mid‑1970s and that the F‑15 Eagle was designed for air superiority and entered service in 1976, with Photos of F‑15C and F‑15SE variants illustrating its evolution. Another assessment of influential jets highlights how the F‑15 Eagle could carry a large missile load while maintaining high performance.
By combining powerful radar, long‑range missiles and exceptional thrust‑to‑weight ratio, the Eagle set the standard for fourth‑generation fighters. Its success pushed rivals to pursue comparable high‑energy designs and cemented the idea that air superiority platforms should dominate both at altitude and in low‑level engagements. For planners, the F‑15 proved that investing heavily in a premier air‑to‑air fighter could yield decades of deterrent value.
General Dynamics F‑16 Fighting Falcon
The F‑16 Fighting Falcon brought the “lightweight fighter” philosophy into mainstream service and became one of the most iconic jets the U.S. Air Force operates. A detailed profile notes that the F‑16 Fighting Falcon is one of the most iconic fighter jets that the Air Force operates and that it has Now been in operation for over 50 years, adopted by more than 25 countries. Its frameless bubble canopy, side‑stick controller and relaxed‑stability design gave pilots superb visibility and agility.
By proving that a relatively small, affordable aircraft could deliver high‑end performance, the F‑16 reshaped procurement strategies worldwide. Many air forces adopted it as a multirole backbone, using advanced avionics and weapons to keep it relevant. The Fighting Falcon also became a testbed for new sensors and targeting pods, helping to normalize precision strike and networked operations in everyday air campaigns.
Sukhoi Su‑27 “Flanker”
The Sukhoi Su‑27, known by its NATO reporting name Flanker, was the Soviet answer to the F‑15 and a leap in maneuverability and range. One influential ranking of fighters that changed aerial warfare highlights the Su‑27 Flanker with a Photo by Dimitri, underscoring its status as a benchmark design. With powerful engines, long‑range missiles and a large wing, the Su‑27 could patrol vast frontiers and challenge Western aircraft in high‑energy dogfights.
Its agility, showcased in dramatic post‑stall maneuvers, pushed Western designers to prioritize close‑in handling even as BVR combat grew more important. The Flanker’s derivatives, from multirole variants to carrier‑capable models, spread advanced Russian design concepts across export markets. Strategically, the Su‑27 signaled that any future conflict with a peer adversary would involve highly capable fighters on both sides, not just Western dominance.
McDonnell Douglas F/A‑18 Hornet
The F/A‑18 Hornet redefined what a carrier‑based multirole fighter could do, blending air‑to‑air prowess with precision strike. A widely cited overview of influential fighters notes that the F/A‑18 Hornet gave naval aviation a platform that could dogfight and then pivot to strike targets as needed, simplifying carrier air wing composition. Its digital flight controls and robust structure allowed repeated catapult launches and arrested landings without sacrificing agility.
By proving that one airframe could credibly handle fleet defense, close air support and interdiction, the Hornet influenced later designs and procurement choices. Navies and air forces increasingly sought flexible platforms rather than specialized single‑mission jets. The Hornet’s success also highlighted the value of integrated avionics, where radar, weapons and electronic warfare systems work seamlessly to give pilots an information edge in complex battlespaces.
Lockheed Martin F‑22 Raptor
The Lockheed Martin F‑22 Raptor marked the arrival of operational stealth air superiority, changing how air battles are conceived. One assessment of legendary jets states that When the Lockheed Martin F‑22 arrived, it changed everything, emphasizing its combination of low observability, supercruise and advanced sensors. Unlike earlier fighters, the Raptor was designed to see first, shoot first and remain unseen, shifting the balance decisively in favor of the pilot who controls information.
Its impact goes beyond raw performance. The F‑22 forced potential adversaries to invest heavily in integrated air defenses, passive sensors and counter‑stealth tactics. It also accelerated the move toward networked warfare, where fighters share data to build a common picture of the battlespace. For air planners, the Raptor became proof that true air dominance in contested environments requires stealth, sensor fusion and high‑end kinematics in a single package.
Lockheed F‑35 Lightning II
The F‑35 Lightning II extended stealth into a global, multirole platform, prioritizing sensors and connectivity as much as raw speed. Designed to replace a wide range of legacy aircraft, it brings low observability, advanced radar and electronic warfare tools to allied air forces that never operated the F‑22. Its distributed aperture system and helmet‑mounted display give pilots a 360‑degree view, turning the jet into a flying sensor node.
Strategically, the F‑35 has become a cornerstone of coalition air power. By standardizing on a common platform, partners can share tactics, maintenance infrastructure and software upgrades. The aircraft’s emphasis on data fusion reflects a broader shift in aerial combat, where winning the information war, integrating with ground and naval assets and coordinating Beyond Visual Range engagements can matter more than traditional dogfighting metrics.
Mikoyan‑Gurevich MiG‑29
The MiG‑29 was the Soviet Union’s agile frontline fighter, designed to counter the F‑16 and F‑18 with high thrust‑to‑weight and excellent low‑altitude performance. Its helmet‑mounted sight and off‑boresight missiles gave pilots a lethal edge in close‑in engagements, foreshadowing capabilities that Western fighters would later adopt. Analyses of altitude performance note that low‑level flight provides raw acceleration, tighter manoeuvres and terrain‑hugging stealth ideal for dogfights and evasion, traits the MiG‑29 exploited.
By emphasizing maneuverability and short‑range missile effectiveness, the MiG‑29 reminded planners that even in an age of BVR missiles, knife‑fight ranges still mattered. Its export to numerous countries also forced NATO to train against similar threat profiles, influencing exercises and simulator design. The aircraft’s strengths and weaknesses continue to inform how modern fighters balance speed, survivability and strike capability across altitude bands.
Fokker D.VII
The Fokker D.VII arrived late in World War I but quickly earned a reputation as one of the conflict’s finest fighters. A detailed review of historic aircraft notes that it is often incorrectly called the “Me” D.VII, yet it stood out for its forgiving handling and ability to hang on its propeller while attacking enemy bombers and reconnaissance planes while they were forming up. That combination of stability and climb performance made it deadly in the hands of even average pilots.
Its impact was so pronounced that the Armistice specifically demanded the surrender of all D.VIIs, an acknowledgment of their battlefield value. The aircraft demonstrated that ease of use and benign stall characteristics could be as important as raw speed. Designers took that lesson into the interwar years, seeking fighters that could deliver high performance without punishing less experienced aircrew.
Future sixth‑generation concepts
Emerging sixth‑generation concepts, including projects like China’s notional J‑50, are being shaped by hard lessons from a century of air combat. An analysis citing a 2015 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment report by John Stillion explains that aerial combat has shifted away from traditional dogfighting to beyond‑visual‑range engagements due to advances in sensors, weapons and communications, with the Assessment methods of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessment, or CSBA, highlighting these trends. Designers now prioritize stealth across more frequencies, cooperative engagement and resilient data links.
At the same time, research into autonomous systems, such as DARPA’s ACE program, reflects a recognition that future air superiority may rely on manned‑unmanned teaming. One technical overview notes that for several decades, technological advancements have enabled air warfare to evolve from dogfighting to beyond‑visual‑range air‑to‑air engagements, underscoring how algorithms and unmanned platforms will shape The Future battlespace. These concepts suggest that the next iconic warplanes may be defined as much by software and networks as by airframes.
More from Morning Overview