Global investors are still living with the aftershocks of the DeepSeek crash, when a Chinese model’s sudden rise wiped hundreds of billions of dollars from the world’s most crowded AI trades. One year on, Chinese developers are again racing ahead in open models and low-cost services, and markets are positioning for another potential jolt from across the Pacific. The stakes are no longer just about one stock’s collapse but about whether the entire AI boom can absorb a second Chinese shock without breaking.
From DeepSeek’s surprise to a global AI repricing
The original DeepSeek shock was a textbook case of how quickly AI breakthroughs can overturn market assumptions. When DeepSeek’s new model arrived, it undercut Western rivals on cost and performance, convincing traders that the profit pool around premium, closed systems was far less secure than it looked. As DeepSeek’s market share climbed and other Chinese models gained traction, investors suddenly had to reprice everything from chipmakers to cloud platforms that had been valued as if their dominance was unassailable, a shift captured in detailed analyses of Chinese models.
The most visible casualty was NVIDIA, the world’s most popular chip manufacturer and the symbol of the AI hardware boom. On a single Monday in late January, NVIDIA’s share price plunged 17 percent, erasing nearly $600 billion in market value as traders digested what cheaper, capable Chinese AI might mean for future demand. A separate breakdown of the DeepSeek R1 launch underscored how quickly sentiment turned, noting that NVIDIA’s stock was down 17 percent by the close of trading on that Monday in Jan, even as other U.S. giants such as Google’s parent company also came under pressure in the wake of DeepSeek R1.
Chinese AI’s new edge: open source and low cost
What has changed over the past year is that Chinese developers have moved from being a disruptive surprise to a structural force in the AI ecosystem. In a critical shift during 2025, Chinese firms such as Alibaba’s Qwen, DeepSeek, and Baidu came to dominate open source leaderboards, frequently topping benchmarks that had previously been led by Western labs. That leadership in open models, documented in assessments of Chinese AI risks, means investors can no longer assume that the most capable systems will always be tied to U.S. or European platforms.
Pricing is amplifying that advantage. At the start of 2025, China’s technology sector hit a turning point as Chinese artificial intelligence providers began offering competitive models at a fraction of the cost of Western rivals, a trend that has shaped flows into China-focused tech funds and exchange traded products. Analyses of those vehicles highlight how, in January, Chinese AI offerings reset expectations for what developers and enterprises should pay for cutting edge capabilities, with Chinese models marketed as both powerful and aggressively discounted. For markets, that combination of technical strength and low pricing is exactly the recipe for another round of margin compression across the global AI stack.
Why markets fear a second Chinese shock
One year after the DeepSeek crash, the core lesson for investors is that AI valuations are highly sensitive to competitive surprises, especially from China. Commentators looking back at the episode argue that the message from that moment remains relevant even though the U.S. stock market has since recovered its headline indices. The concern now is that a fresh wave of Chinese innovation could again undercut the business models of U.S. leaders such as OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic, a risk that recent market commentary frames as a new Chinese AI threat to the premium pricing that underpins their valuations.
The fear is not abstract. Earlier disruptions showed how a single product release can trigger a tech-led selloff when it exposes vulnerabilities in crowded trades. When DeepSeek’s new AI model arrived in late January last year, it set off a chain reaction that pulled down Nvidia’s share price by 17 percent and highlighted how exposed investors were to swings in expectations for AI demand. A broader review of that period, framed around “stormy skies” for markets, stressed that the DeepSeek launch revealed just how vulnerable tech companies’ valuations are to sudden shifts in perceived leadership, a point underscored in analysis of Nvidia and its peers. With Chinese models now entrenched on open leaderboards and pushing prices lower, investors see a clear path for history to rhyme.
NVIDIA’s hard lesson and the chipmakers’ dilemma
No company embodies the tension between AI optimism and competitive risk more than NVIDIA. The 17 percent plunge that erased nearly $600 billion in value was not just a reaction to one headline, it was a repricing of how much of NVIDIA’s future growth depended on a narrow set of assumptions about Western AI dominance. A one year retrospective on that meltdown describes how, by Jan this year, NVIDIA had been forced into a strategic pivot to justify its valuation, shifting from a pure growth story to a more disciplined path that analysts describe as the route to a more rational AI market.
That pivot captures the broader dilemma facing chipmakers and hardware suppliers. On one side, demand for compute remains intense as both Western and Chinese developers race to train larger models and deploy them into everything from search to industrial automation. On the other, the DeepSeek episode showed that if Chinese players can deliver similar performance with cheaper models and more efficient training, the total amount of hardware spending required to achieve a given level of capability may be lower than bulls expect. I see that tension as the central question for AI hardware valuations: whether the market is still pricing NVIDIA and its rivals as if the world will only ever want the most expensive, proprietary systems, even as Chinese competition pushes the ecosystem toward leaner, more open architectures.
Positioning for the next phase of AI volatility
For investors, the practical challenge is to distinguish between cyclical volatility and structural change as Chinese AI matures. The DeepSeek crash was a violent reminder that concentration in a handful of U.S. names leaves portfolios exposed when the narrative shifts, but it was also an early signal of a deeper transition toward a more multipolar AI landscape. Detailed risk assessments now treat Chinese firms such as Alibaba, Qwen, DeepSeek, and Baidu as core parts of the current AI ecosystem rather than fringe players, a recognition that is reshaping how analysts map AI investment risks across regions and sectors.
In my view, the next Chinese AI shock, if it comes, is less likely to be a single-day collapse and more likely to unfold as a series of competitive blows that steadily erode the pricing power of today’s leaders. That could mean more pressure on subscription fees for AI software, thinner margins for cloud providers, and a tougher environment for chipmakers that have been priced for perfection. It also means that investors who treat Chinese AI purely as a geopolitical risk, rather than as a source of genuine technological leadership, risk missing both the downside and the opportunity. One year after DeepSeek, markets are not just bracing for another crash, they are slowly adapting to a world in which the next breakthrough model is just as likely to come from Shenzhen or Hangzhou as from Silicon Valley.
More from Morning Overview