Image Credit: Daniel J. Prostak; Crocodiletiger~commonswiki Crocodiletiger~commonswiki used courtesy of Daniel Prostak - CC BY-SA 4.0/Wiki Commons

Wall Street’s view of NVIDIA has shifted from a simple growth story to a referendum on the future of artificial intelligence itself. NVDA now sits at the center of every debate about how big the AI hardware market can get, how long hyperscale spending can last, and whether today’s margins are sustainable. To understand what professionals really think, I look at how analysts are rating the stock, what they expect for earnings, and where they see the biggest risks.

Across those lenses, the message is clear: the Street still sees NVIDIA as a core AI winner, but it is increasingly a battleground over how much future success is already priced in. The numbers behind current Analyst Ratings, the detailed price targets into 2025 and 2026, and the arguments from both bulls and bears show a market that is enthusiastic, but no longer blindly so.

How analysts are rating NVDA right now

The cleanest snapshot of sentiment comes from the formal Analyst Ratings on NVIDIA. Recent analysis of NVIDIA shows NVDA categorized overwhelmingly at the positive end of the scale, with 56% of covering analysts assigning a Strong Buy and another 39% calling it a Buy. Only a small minority sit in the Hold or Strong Sell camps, and the Hold label is explicitly tracked alongside Strong Buy, Buy, and Strong Sell to capture that nuance. That skew tells me Wall Street still sees NVDA as a leader in AI accelerators and data center GPUs, not a mature hardware name that has already peaked.

Yet even inside that bullish consensus, there is a growing focus on what could go wrong. The same analysis that produces those Strong Buy and Buy ratios also highlights bears who argue that NVDA’s valuation embeds aggressive assumptions about AI spending and competitive dynamics. Their case leans on the idea of a negative skew in outcomes if cloud customers slow orders or if rivals narrow the performance gap. In other words, the Street’s base case is still optimistic, but the distribution of possible futures that analysts model is widening, which is exactly what I would expect for a stock that has become a macro proxy for AI.

Price targets, growth expectations, and the 2026 debate

Under the surface of those ratings, the real debate is about how far NVDA’s earnings power can stretch into the next cycle. Forecasts that look out to 2025 frame the range of outcomes that professionals are gaming out. One widely cited set of projections for Nvidia into Dec 2025 lays out both bullish and bearish price scenarios, with the upside case assuming that AI infrastructure spending remains intense and that NVDA continues to command premium pricing on its accelerators. The bearish side, by contrast, bakes in slower unit growth and some compression in margins as competition and customer bargaining power increase.

Looking further out, some analysts argue that the market is still underestimating how much earnings can expand in 2026 if AI workloads keep scaling. One detailed model of Key Points around NVDA’s trajectory contends that Nvidia could see its profits roughly double as a massive backlog converts into revenue and as new product cycles lift average selling prices. That analysis explicitly calls out the Street for underappreciating 2026 growth potential, arguing that consensus estimates leave room for upside if AI adoption in cloud, automotive, and enterprise software accelerates. I read that as a sign that even within a bullish camp, there is a subset of analysts who think the current price still does not fully reflect the scale of the AI buildout.

Where the Street sees risk, and what could drive the next leg

Despite the optimism, the professional view of NVDA is not one dimensional. A closer look at how individual researchers frame the story shows a careful balance between enthusiasm for AI and concern about cyclicality. In a recent breakdown of what Wall Street thinks about NVIDIA, analyst Talha Qureshi highlights NVDA’s position as one of the best stocks in the market, but also notes that the company’s total addressable market is expanding in multiple directions at once. That expansion, which spans data centers, gaming, automotive, and edge AI, is part of why 47 distinct analyst opinions are tracked on the name, and why the stock has become a bellwether for broader tech risk appetite.

Others focus more narrowly on what could drive the next leg of gains. One detailed review of what is pushing Nvidia higher points to the company’s recent stock surge as a function of AI data center demand, software ecosystem lock-in, and the potential for new platforms in areas like autonomous driving. Another prominent call argues that NVIDIA is “ripe” for gains in 2026, citing a firmly intact long term demand backdrop for AI chips and forecasting that analysts who track Nvidia expect continued revenue growth as new architectures roll out. When I put those threads together, I see a Street that is still leaning bullish, but increasingly focused on execution milestones like product launches, backlog conversion, and hyperscaler capex plans.

That is why I view NVDA today as both a conviction AI holding and a sophisticated risk management exercise for Wall Street. The consensus Strong Buy and Buy skew, the explicit 56% and 39% figures in the ratings, the detailed 2025 price targets, and the 2026 growth arguments all point in the same direction: professionals largely believe Nvidia can keep compounding if AI infrastructure spending holds up. At the same time, the presence of vocal bears, the emphasis on potential negative outcomes in the analysis, and the careful parsing of scenarios by researchers like Talha Qureshi show that no one is treating NVDA as a free ride. For investors trying to read the Street, the message is not simply that NVDA is loved, but that it is now the stock where the entire AI thesis is being priced, tested, and constantly re-evaluated.

More from Morning Overview