Elon Musk has finally given investors the clearest signal yet that a SpaceX initial public offering is on the table, but his comments are more nuanced than the headlines suggest. He has endorsed the idea of a 2026 IPO in broad terms while simultaneously rejecting some of the most eye‑catching numbers attached to it and reiterating his long‑standing skepticism about public markets. To understand what Musk really said, it is necessary to trace his own words across several appearances and posts, and to weigh them against the expectations now building around SpaceX.
From “at some point” to a 2026 target
For years, Musk framed a SpaceX listing as a distant possibility, something that might happen only after the company had secured a stable foothold in orbit and beyond. In one appearance, SpaceX CEO and billionaire Elon Musk said the company could go public “at some point,” but he immediately paired that with a warning about the “downsides of being public,” underscoring his concern that quarterly pressures could clash with long‑term Mars ambitions. In that same discussion, he pointed to SpaceX as one of the most valuable privately held companies in the world, a reminder that he did not need an IPO to raise capital or validate the business, even as he hinted that public investors might eventually get a piece of it through an future listing.
That cautious tone shifted when reports emerged that SpaceX was actively preparing for a public offering in 2026. Instead of dismissing the chatter, Elon Musk said that news of a 2026 IPO plan was “accurate,” effectively confirming that the company is working toward that timeline. His acknowledgment did not come in a vacuum: it landed as SpaceX’s valuation and launch cadence were surging, and as Des and other observers were already treating the company as a central pillar of the commercial space economy. By validating the 2026 target, Musk moved the conversation from if to when, even as he left himself room to maneuver on the exact structure and scope of the deal through his carefully worded comments.
What Musk accepted, and what he rejected
Once Musk signaled that a 2026 listing plan was real, attention snapped to the rumored valuation and deal size. Some reports suggested the IPO could value SpaceX at about $800 billion, instantly making it one of the most valuable companies ever to debut on public markets. Musk, however, has been explicit that while the timing talk is broadly right, the valuation chatter is not. In a video appearance, he pushed back against a major detail in the coverage, saying the $800 figure attached to the IPO was “not accurate,” a rare instance of him directly correcting market speculation rather than letting it swirl around him. That distinction matters, because it shows he is willing to embrace a narrative of imminent listing while still policing the numbers that investors are penciling in around the IPO rumors.
His calibration has extended beyond a single interview. Tech CEO Elon Musk has also walked back aspects of earlier Funding Reports that implied a fully baked deal, prompting fresh questions about whether a 2026 IPO is truly In Play or still subject to the same volatility that has characterized his other corporate decisions. In that context, his insistence that the valuation talk is off base looks less like modesty and more like an attempt to keep expectations from outrunning what SpaceX’s balance sheet and Starship roadmap can support. The result is a two‑track message: Musk accepts that SpaceX is working toward going public, but he wants investors to understand that the precise terms, including how much of the company is sold and at what price, remain fluid despite the heightened speculation.
The scale of the deal and the $100 Trillion vision
Even without a confirmed price tag, the potential scale of a SpaceX listing is staggering. Reporting has, so far, pegged the company’s prospective valuation at levels that could make it the largest public offering of all time, a prospect that has already become a headache for bankers and regulators trying to imagine how such a float would be absorbed. Investors have watched as Tesla stock has been punished when Musk stepped away to work in the White House earlier this year, even as SpaceX, the other pillar of his empire, has continued to grow. That divergence has only intensified interest in a separate SpaceX listing, since it would give markets a cleaner way to price the launch and satellite business without filtering it through the volatility of Tesla shares.
Musk has not exactly tried to tamp down the sense of scale. In another discussion of SpaceX’s long‑term potential, he said the company Could One Day Reach a valuation of $100 Trillion, describing that figure as something that “It Is Possible” to achieve amid 2026 IPO Prep. That number is so large that it functions less as a near‑term forecast and more as a statement of ambition about what a fully developed Mars and satellite economy might be worth. Still, by putting $100 Trillion on the table, he has framed any 2026 IPO as just the opening chapter in a much larger story, one in which today’s valuation debates look small compared with the future he envisions for Elon Musk Thinks.
Why some still doubt a traditional IPO
Despite Musk’s confirmation that a 2026 listing plan is “accurate,” not everyone believes SpaceX will follow a conventional IPO path. Ace investor Chamath Palihapitiya has argued that “SpaceX will not go for IPO,” predicting instead that a reverse merger with Tesla is more likely. His thesis is that Musk might prefer to fold SpaceX into an already public vehicle he controls, rather than subject a second flagship company to the full glare of public markets and the constraints that come with them. That view has gained some traction among investors who note that Bloomberg also reported on the possibility of a reverse merger with Tesla, reinforcing Palihapitiya’s sense that a more complex structure could ultimately win out over a straightforward IPO route.
I see that skepticism as rooted in Musk’s own ambivalence about being public. He has repeatedly complained about short‑termism at Tesla, and investors punished Tesla stock when Musk shifted focus to the White House, highlighting how sensitive public markets can be to his time and attention. If he believes that SpaceX’s Mars program and Starship development will require decades of patient capital, he may be tempted to structure any listing in a way that preserves maximum control, whether through dual‑class shares, a spin‑off of Starlink only, or some hybrid transaction that echoes Palihapitiya’s reverse‑merger idea. Until Musk spells out the mechanics, the only firm takeaway is that even a confirmed 2026 target does not guarantee a plain‑vanilla debut on the Nasdaq for SpaceX investors.
The political and strategic backdrop
Any SpaceX listing will unfold against a political backdrop that is unusually personal for Musk. As Des and others have noted, he has had to juggle his role as Tech CEO Elon Musk with his responsibilities in the White House, a combination that has already rattled Tesla shareholders and raised questions about conflicts of interest. At the same time, SpaceX’s deepening ties with NASA and the Pentagon mean that a public float would not just be a financial event but a strategic one, potentially affecting how the United States manages its launch capacity and satellite infrastructure. Musk himself has acknowledged that the company’s work with the new NASA administrator is central to its future, a reminder that any IPO will be scrutinized not only by Wall Street but also by policymakers who rely on SpaceX contracts.
That strategic role helps explain why Musk is so careful in how he talks about the IPO. By confirming the general plan while disputing specific numbers, he signals confidence without inviting accusations that he is hyping the stock of a future government contractor. It also gives him leverage in negotiations with both investors and officials, since he can argue that public ownership will broaden access to the company’s upside while insisting that he needs to retain enough control to keep long‑term national and scientific goals on track. When I put all of his comments together, I see a leader trying to thread a narrow path: he wants the capital and prestige that come with a blockbuster listing, but he is determined to keep SpaceX’s mission, not its market cap, at the center of the story he tells about a 2026 IPO plan.
More from Morning Overview