When U.S. aircraft crossed into Venezuelan airspace to seize Nicolás Maduro, the country’s much-advertised Russian-built air defenses never managed to bring down a single jet, helicopter, or drone. The gap between the fearsome reputation of those systems and their actual performance exposed a hard truth about modern warfare: hardware alone does not guarantee protection against a sophisticated opponent. To understand why Venezuela’s Russian air defenses could not stop even one U.S. aircraft, I need to unpack how the operation was planned, how the defenses were built, and how they were systematically blinded, jammed, and bypassed.
The story is not just about one night’s raid. It is about how President Donald Trump’s decision to authorize a high-risk mission collided with years of Venezuelan investment in Russian and Chinese technology, and how U.S. planners exploited every weakness in that network. From terrain and training to electronic warfare and political decay, the failure was cumulative, not accidental.
The night Operation Absolute Resolve began
The turning point came when President Donald Trump gave the order to launch a coordinated strike package against Venezuela’s leadership and air defenses. According to accounts of the mission, Trump approved the operation at 23:46 VET, which corresponded to 22:46 EST, setting in motion a tightly choreographed sequence of airstrikes and special operations that would unfold largely before Venezuelan commanders understood what was happening. That decision, described in detail in reconstructions of the 2026 United States strikes, framed the entire engagement as a surprise blow rather than a gradual escalation that might have given Caracas time to mobilize.
Inside the Pentagon and associated command centers, the mission was formalized under the codename Operation Absolute Resolve. Planners synchronized long-range strikes, electronic warfare, and the insertion of special operations forces so that by the time Venezuelan radar operators saw anything unusual, their screens were already being jammed or fed misleading information. The timing, down to that repeated figure of 46 minutes past the hour, was not incidental; it reflected a deliberate effort to hit when human alertness in command posts was likely to be at its lowest and when the element of surprise could be maximized.
What Venezuela thought its Russian shield could do
On paper, Venezuela had built one of the most formidable air defense networks in Latin America, anchored by the Russian S-300VM system, known in NATO terminology as the SA-23 Gladiator. The S-300VM is designed to track and engage aircraft, cruise missiles, and even some ballistic missiles at long ranges, and Caracas positioned it as a shield for the capital and key regime assets. Commentators later described how, in Venezuelan planning, these batteries were supposed to create a lethal bubble around Caracas, deterring any U.S. attempt to fly close enough to insert special forces or conduct precision strikes.
Analysts have noted that the S-300VM Antey-2500 was treated as the centerpiece of this strategy, a system explicitly marketed as capable of defeating American stealth aircraft and advanced cruise missiles. In Venezuelan doctrine, these Russian systems were meant to integrate with shorter-range defenses and Chinese-made sensors to form a layered umbrella. The political message was clear: any U.S. incursion would be met by a modern, Russian-backed shield. The reality, as the raid showed, was that a complex system in theory can be brittle in practice if it is not maintained, crewed, and networked to the standard its designers intended.
How U.S. airpower set the stage for the raid
Before any helicopter carrying special operators crossed into hostile airspace, U.S. planners focused on carving out corridors of relative safety. Fixed-wing aircraft and standoff weapons were used to degrade radars, command nodes, and air bases so that by the time the assault force moved, the defenders were already reeling. Accounts of how Airpower Paved the Way for Delta Force describe a sequence in which U.S. aircraft first established air dominance, then struck Venezuelan airbases, and only afterward did helicopters from units like the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment descend on Maduro’s location.
Low-flying helicopters exploited terrain masking, hugging valleys and ridgelines to stay below the radar horizon of surviving sensors. Reporting on How low-flying helicopters and terrain masking helped explains that this tactic, combined with prior suppression of air defenses, allowed U.S. forces to reach Maduro with minimal exposure to radar-guided missiles. In effect, the air campaign did not simply dodge the Russian systems; it systematically dismantled the environment those systems needed to function, from early warning radars to the airbases that might have launched interceptors.
Electronic warfare: the “invisible” opening punch
The most decisive blows to Venezuela’s Russian and Chinese defenses were delivered in the electromagnetic spectrum rather than with explosives. U.S. electronic warfare aircraft, including specialized jamming platforms, targeted the radars and communications that tied the air defense network together. One widely discussed account describes how Electronic warfare aircraft played a decisive role by suppressing Venezuelan sensors, allowing strike and transport aircraft to enter and exit airspace with far less risk of detection or engagement.
Complementing that effort, U.S. Navy EA-18G Growler jets reportedly scrambled Venezuelan defenses by jamming their radars and communications during the push to capture Maduro. By saturating key frequencies and injecting noise into radar receivers, these aircraft made it difficult for operators to distinguish real targets from electronic clutter. In such an environment, even a capable Russian-made system can be reduced to guesswork, and firing expensive missiles at phantom contacts becomes a losing proposition.
Geography, radar physics, and the “Honeybadger” problem
Even without jamming, Venezuela’s geography imposed hard limits on what its Russian systems could see. Long-range radars depend on line of sight, and mountainous terrain can hide low-flying aircraft behind ridges until they are very close. One detailed autopsy of the S-300VM network captured this with the phrase “Geography is a Honeybadger,” noting that even if the radars had survived initial electronic suppression, the combination of terrain and low-altitude flight paths made line-of-sight targeting near impossible in many sectors.
U.S. planners leaned into this physics problem. By routing helicopters and some fixed-wing aircraft through valleys and along coastlines where radar coverage was weakest, they turned Venezuela’s own mountains into a shield. The S-300VM’s theoretical engagement ranges assume targets at medium or high altitude in relatively open airspace. When aircraft fly low, use terrain masking, and are supported by electronic warfare, those ranges shrink dramatically. In practice, the Russian systems were fighting not just U.S. technology but also the curvature of the earth and the folds of the Andes.
Chinese sensors and the collapse of the “anti-stealth” promise
Venezuela did not rely solely on Russian hardware. Central to its defense strategy was the Chinese-made JY-series radar, advertised as an “anti-stealth” system capable of detecting low-observable aircraft at long range. Analysts later described how Central to Venezuela’s defence strategy was the Chinese JY-27A radar, which was supposed to provide early warning and cue Russian missile batteries. In theory, this Chinese technology would plug gaps in Russian coverage and make it harder for stealthy or low-flying aircraft to slip through.
In practice, electronic warfare and stealth tactics appear to have neutralized this Chinese contribution. Reports describe how U.S. forces used a combination of jamming and low-observable aircraft to blind and bypass both Russian and Chinese systems, clearing paths for helicopters carrying elite forces into Caracas. The collapse of China’s “anti-stealth” radar promise in this context did not just embarrass Beijing’s marketing; it also deprived Venezuelan operators of the early warning they needed to coordinate a coherent response, leaving individual batteries to fight in isolation.
Training, readiness, and the human factor behind the consoles
Hardware performance is inseparable from the people who operate it, and here Venezuela faced structural disadvantages. Years of economic crisis, sanctions, and political turmoil eroded maintenance budgets and training cycles for its air defense units. One detailed analysis of the raid noted that Douglas Barrie of the International Institute for Strategic Studies highlighted issues such as readiness levels and operator training as key factors behind the failure of Venezuelan-operated Russian systems to engage U.S. aircraft effectively.Other experts echoed that assessment, arguing that the embarrassment for Russia was less about the intrinsic quality of its weapons and more about how they were fielded. Venezuelan crews had limited opportunities to train against realistic threats, especially high-end electronic warfare and stealth tactics. When the real thing arrived, in the form of a coordinated U.S. suppression of enemy air defenses campaign, the gap between simulator drills and combat reality became painfully obvious. In that sense, the failure was as much institutional as technological.
SEAD, dollars, and the economics of suppression
Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses, or SEAD, Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses, is a mission set that the U.S. military has refined over decades, investing heavily in specialized aircraft, munitions, and training. One pointed comment circulating in military circles captured this with the line that “the best SEAD is in dollars,” a nod to the sheer financial weight behind U.S. capabilities. From anti-radiation missiles that home in on radar emissions to decoys that trick defenders into revealing their positions, the U.S. toolkit is built to dismantle air defenses methodically.
Venezuela, by contrast, had spent billions on acquiring Russian and Chinese systems but far less on building a resilient, redundant network that could survive a sustained SEAD campaign. Analysts from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, including Mark Cancian, have argued that going up against the U.S. is “of course” a worst-case scenario for any air defense, because American forces combine high-end technology with deep experience in SEAD. The Venezuelan experience underscored that buying a few marquee systems is not enough when the adversary can afford to throw layers of jamming, decoys, and precision weapons at every radar that dares to switch on.
Why not a single U.S. aircraft was shot down
By the time the first U.S. helicopters were approaching their landing zones, Venezuela’s Russian-supplied defenses were already degraded, confused, and partially blinded. Reports on the raid emphasize that Venezuela’s Russian air defenses did not shoot down a single U.S. aircraft, a stark outcome given the systems’ advertised capabilities. The reasons were cumulative: early strikes and jamming disrupted command and control, geography and low-altitude tactics kept many aircraft below radar coverage, and operators faced an overwhelming electronic onslaught that made it hard to distinguish real threats from decoys.
At a strategic level, the failure also reflected a mismatch between expectations and reality. Venezuelan leaders had treated their Russian and Chinese acquisitions as a deterrent, assuming that the mere presence of S-300VM batteries and “anti-stealth” radars would dissuade Washington from attempting a direct raid. Instead, President Trump authorized a mission that treated those defenses as obstacles to be studied and dismantled. Once U.S. forces committed to a full-spectrum SEAD and special operations campaign, the Venezuelan network, hollowed out by years of underinvestment and political turmoil, proved unable to stop even one aircraft from reaching its target.
What the raid reveals about Russian air defenses in a U.S. fight
The Venezuelan episode does not prove that Russian air defenses are useless, but it does highlight their vulnerabilities when facing a peer adversary with superior electronic warfare, stealth, and SEAD doctrine. Analysts have stressed that systems like the S-300VM Antey-2500 can be formidable when properly integrated, maintained, and crewed, especially against regional opponents without advanced jamming or stealth. However, as the autopsy of Venezuela’s S-300VM network showed, those strengths can be neutralized by geography, electronic attack, and low-altitude tactics.
For Moscow and Beijing, the optics are uncomfortable. The failure of Venezuelan-operated Russian systems and Chinese radars to stop U.S. aircraft is being scrutinized by potential export customers who had been told these technologies could hold American forces at bay. For Washington, the operation reinforces a long-standing lesson: when the U.S. is willing to invest the time, money, and political capital into planning a complex raid, even heavily advertised “anti-access” systems can be penetrated. The night U.S. aircraft flew into Caracas without loss was not a magic trick; it was the predictable outcome of decades of investment in SEAD, electronic warfare, and special operations, colliding with a brittle, overconfident air defense network that could not deliver on its promises.
More from Morning Overview