Tiny sharks have long been blamed for the eerily perfect circles carved into the skin of whales, dolphins and even submarines, but until recently the details of how they pulled off this surgical vandalism remained murky. New research, paired with years of field observations, has now clarified how cookiecutter sharks create those crisp, crater-like wounds and why the scars show up so consistently on certain whales. The solution turns out to be a mix of specialized anatomy, stealthy behavior and the evolutionary arms race that has shaped both predator and prey in the open ocean.
The result is a rare kind of marine mystery where the “who” was known, but the “how” and “why” took decades to piece together. By tracing individual whales, dissecting shark mouths and even watching viral videos that brought this obscure species to a wider audience, scientists have finally mapped out how a shark barely half a meter long can leave a mark that defines an animal’s identity for life.
The whale with a name written in scars
For whale researchers, the puzzle of circular bite marks is not abstract, it is etched into the backs and flukes of animals they follow for years. One humpback known as Crater carries so many round wounds that her catalog number, 924, is almost secondary to the pockmarked pattern that inspired her nickname. Descriptions of Crater There emphasize the pale patches and spots on her flukes, each one a healed record of a small shark taking a precise plug of flesh.
Those scars are not random blemishes, they are a living archive of encounters between a massive whale and a much smaller predator that specializes in hit-and-run feeding. When I look at images of Crater, the circles stand out like lunar craters on a dark surface, hinting at repeated attacks over many seasons. The fact that scientists can recognize Crater instantly by these marks underscores how central cookiecutter bites have become to understanding individual whale histories.
A tiny shark built like a biological hole saw
The animal responsible for those circles is the common cookiecutter shark, formally known as Common cookiecutter sharks (Isistius brasiliensis). Despite their modest size, typically up to around 20 inches, they are equipped with a mouth that functions less like a typical shark jaw and more like a precision cutting tool. Their upper teeth are small and gripping, while the lower jaw carries larger razor-sharp, serrated or saw-like teeth arranged in a single band that can slice a near-perfect circle.Anatomical studies describe the shark Forming a suction cup with its mouth, then anchoring itself to prey before twisting. That combination of suction and sawing motion allows the lower teeth to gouge out a plug of tissue with remarkable consistency, which is why the resulting wounds on whales and other large animals are so strikingly circular. The shark’s compact, cigar-shaped body and oversized liver help it hover in the water column, positioning this specialized mouth exactly where it needs to strike.
How the “cookie cutter” attack actually works
For years, biologists could only infer the attack sequence from scars and dead specimens, but behavioral reconstructions now give a clearer picture of the choreography involved. The shark approaches larger animals from below or from the side, presses its lips against the skin to create a vacuum, and then uses its lower jaw like a rotating blade. One detailed account notes that the shark uses its fleshy lips to suction itself to prey and then spins its body around like a drill, a motion that explains the clean edges of the resulting wound as described in analyses that emphasize how it moves “around like a drill” Instead of tearing.
Once the plug is removed, the shark releases and retreats into the dark, leaving the much larger animal alive but marked. Because the shark is not trying to kill its host, only to harvest a small “cookie” of flesh, it can feed on animals many times its own size, from whales to large fish and even other sharks. The precision of the bite, combined with the shark’s quick getaway, explains why so many whales accumulate dozens of scars without obvious signs of trauma beyond the healed circles.
Glow-in-the-dark camouflage and a fatty hovercraft
Perfect circles are only part of the story; the shark’s ability to get close enough to bite without being noticed is just as important. The cookiecutter’s belly is bioluminescent, and Part of the fish’s belly lights up with a green glow that, to any creature below, blends in with the sun and moonlight filtering down from the surface. This counter-illumination makes the shark’s silhouette vanish when seen from underneath, turning it into a ghostly outline that is hard for prey to detect until it is too late.
On top of that, the shark’s oversized, oil-rich liver acts like a built-in buoyancy aid, letting it hover almost motionless in the water column. One detailed natural history account notes that it (the cutter) hovers intermittently in the water column, buoyed by an oversized fatty liver, and that the shark actually produces a glow that blends into the downwelling sunlight It ( the cutter ) hovers intermittenti. This combination of neutral buoyancy and camouflage lets the shark hang in place like a biological mine, waiting for a whale or tuna to pass within striking distance.
From TikTok curiosity to scientific case study
Although cookiecutter sharks have been known to science for more than a century, their leap into public consciousness has been surprisingly recent. Short videos explaining how a shark barely half a meter long can carve perfect circles into whales have racked up millions of views, turning obscure anatomical details into viral talking points. One popular clip from a creator who goes by SciBytes walks through the shark’s anatomy and the mystery of the circular wounds, using animations and real footage to show how the bites line up with scars on whales and even man-made objects, as seen in a widely shared SciBytes explainer.
Another viral breakdown comes from the series Basement Biology, where host Basement Biology presenter Josh describes the cookiecutter as “the most ballsy shark” and walks viewers through how it targets much larger animals. In that video, posted in late Jul, he emphasizes the shark’s stealth, its suction-cup mouth and the way it leaves those unmistakable craters behind. These social media dissections have not replaced peer-reviewed work, but they have helped translate technical findings into vivid stories that make it easier to grasp how such a small shark can leave such a big mark.
Whales built to survive a lifetime of bites
The fact that whales like Crater can accumulate dozens of cookiecutter scars and keep going speaks to how robust these animals are. Large whales are already known to survive extreme injuries, including embedded weapons from historical hunts. One survey of marine extremes notes that this resilience was proven by the discovery of century-old brass harpoon tips embedded in scars on the backs of whales hunted in earlier eras, a reminder that some individuals have carried metal inside their bodies for generations while still migrating and breeding successfully century-old brass harpoon tips.
From an evolutionary perspective, whales, seals and dolphins have all followed similar paths from land to sea, adapting their bodies to cope with the pressures of deep diving, cold water and persistent parasites and predators. Researchers divided each of the three adaptational paths into sections to reveal similar large-scale patterns, and Each lineage shows convergent solutions like thick blubber, efficient oxygen storage and robust skin. In that context, cookiecutter bites are one more stress these animals are built to absorb, leaving scars that are visually dramatic but usually not life threatening.
Evolution’s arms race in miniature
Seen together, the shark’s specialized mouth, glowing camouflage and hovering posture look like a textbook case of evolutionary fine-tuning. The cookiecutter has carved out a niche where it does not need to overpower its prey, only to attach briefly and remove a small, circular plug. Over time, natural selection has favored individuals with stronger suction, sharper lower teeth and more effective counter-illumination, traits that directly improve their odds of landing a clean bite on a passing whale or tuna. The result is a predator that behaves more like a parasite, taking repeated small meals from hosts that survive the encounter.
On the other side of the arms race, whales and other large animals have responded less by evolving specific defenses against cookiecutters and more by doubling down on general resilience. Thick skin, rapid wound healing and the ability to tolerate chronic scarring all reduce the long-term cost of these attacks. When I look at the pattern of bites on animals like Crater, it reads like a ledger of this ongoing evolutionary negotiation, with each healed circle marking a moment where both predator and prey strategies worked well enough for them to meet again another day.
Why the mystery matters beyond the spectacle
Solving how tiny sharks draw those perfect circles on whales might sound like a niche curiosity, but it has broader implications for how we read the ocean. Every scar on a whale’s back is a data point about where it has traveled, what it has encountered and how it has coped with those encounters. By understanding the mechanics and frequency of cookiecutter bites, scientists can better interpret scar patterns in photo-identification catalogs, refine estimates of how often whales cross paths with certain predators and even infer aspects of their migration routes and diving behavior.
There is also a lesson here about how modern science communicates. Detailed anatomical work on cookiecutter sharks, from the structure of their lower teeth to the way their mouths form suction, has been around for years, but it took a mix of field observations, comparative evolution studies and accessible explainers to bring the full story into focus. When I watch a polished TikTok about a shark that glows from below and drills perfect circles into whales, then trace the claims back to technical descriptions of its mouth and bioluminescence, I see a model for how obscure marine biology can move from the lab to the public without losing its rigor.
More from Morning Overview