High in the Peruvian Andes, a ribbon of thousands of hand-dug pits marches across a barren hillside, so regular and extensive that it is visible from the air like a dotted scar. For decades, archaeologists could agree on little beyond the scale of the feature, which locals call the “Band of Holes,” and the fact that no surviving chronicles clearly explained why it was built. Now, a new wave of research is converging on a compelling answer that reframes these cavities not as random relics, but as a sophisticated tool of imperial control.
Drawing on satellite imagery, fieldwork and comparisons with other Inca infrastructure, researchers argue that the roughly 5,200 holes were part of a state-run system for counting and moving goods, possibly functioning as a kind of three-dimensional spreadsheet carved into the mountain. The emerging explanation does not just solve a long-standing puzzle, it also hints at how the Inca managed to govern a vast, diverse empire without money, markets or written records in the European sense.
The strange “Band of Holes” that refused to fit the script
When I first look at the aerial photographs, what stands out is the sheer order of the landscape: neat rows of circular and rectangular pits, stretching for nearly 1.5 kilometers along a slope above the Pisco Valley in southern Peru. Archaeologists have counted about 5,200 individual cavities, each roughly similar in size, arranged in bands that climb and dip with the terrain in a way that feels deliberate rather than decorative. Early surveys noted that the feature did not match known Inca terraces, tombs or defensive works, which left it stranded outside the usual categories of Andean archaeology.
Over time, that mismatch fueled a small industry of speculation, from ideas about astronomical observatories to suggestions of mass burial grounds, none of which held up under closer inspection of the soil and artifacts. Recent reporting describes how systematic mapping and drone photography have clarified the layout of the thousands of aligned holes, confirming that they form continuous rows that sometimes merge, sometimes split, and occasionally shift in shape, but always maintain a striking regularity. That pattern, combined with the absence of human remains or clear signs of permanent structures, pushed researchers to look beyond funerary or residential explanations.
From mystery to working hypothesis: a state logistics machine
The turning point came as archaeologists began to treat the Band of Holes less as an isolated curiosity and more as one node in a broader imperial network. The site sits near an important route that once linked the highlands to coastal settlements, close to known Inca administrative centers and storage complexes. In that context, the pits start to look less like an enigma and more like infrastructure, potentially tied to the movement of food, textiles or other tribute collected from subject communities. Several teams now argue that the holes were used to sort, count or temporarily store standardized loads, effectively turning the hillside into a giant abacus for imperial accountants.
Recent coverage of the new research notes that the pits appear to be grouped in ways that could correspond to fixed quantities, such as bundles of maize or coca leaves, which would have been tallied as they moved along the route. One analysis describes the feature as a possible “Inca spreadsheet,” a physical grid where each cavity represented a unit in a larger accounting system, complementing the better-known knotted cords called quipus. That interpretation is laid out in detail in reports that frame the Band of Holes as a logistical tool for tracking state resources, with one study arguing that the arrangement of the 5,200 mystery holes aligns closely with how the empire organized labor and tribute.
What the pits themselves reveal about how they were used
To move from a plausible story to a robust explanation, archaeologists have had to scrutinize the holes one by one. Excavations and surface surveys show that most of the pits are shallow and relatively uniform, with walls that would not have supported deep burial shafts or long-term storage jars. Soil samples indicate that they were cut into the bedrock and then left largely empty, with only scattered traces of organic material, which suggests that any goods placed inside were removed quickly rather than stockpiled for years. The absence of grave goods, human bones or heavy ash layers further weakens the idea that this was a cemetery or ritual burning ground.
Instead, the physical evidence fits better with short-term use, such as staging or sorting. Some pits show signs of repeated disturbance, as if items were placed and removed multiple times, while others appear almost pristine, hinting at a structured pattern of use across the band. Reporting on the latest fieldwork notes that the researchers documented subtle variations in size and shape along different segments, which could reflect different categories of goods or different counting units. One account of the project emphasizes how the team used systematic sampling to connect these micro-level observations to the larger picture of Inca administration, arguing that the morphology of the centuries-old 5,200 holes is consistent with a standardized but flexible counting system.
Satellite views, 3D models and a new generation of data
What finally allowed researchers to test these ideas at scale was a suite of digital tools that would have been unthinkable when the Band of Holes was first documented. High-resolution satellite imagery, drone surveys and 3D terrain models have made it possible to map every pit, trace the exact curvature of the band and measure how the rows relate to ancient roads and nearby settlements. By overlaying these datasets, archaeologists can see patterns that are invisible from the ground, such as subtle shifts in alignment that coincide with natural ridges or man-made pathways.
One recent study, highlighted in a technical summary, describes how the team used remote sensing to classify the pits into distinct clusters, then compared those clusters with known Inca storage facilities and administrative centers. The analysis found that the densest sections of the band sit at a natural bottleneck along a route that would have funneled caravans of llamas and porters, which strengthens the case for a checkpoint or counting station. The same work, which is presented in a detailed research release, argues that the spatial organization of the Peruvian hillside holes mirrors how other imperial infrastructures were laid out to maximize control over movement and inventory.
How the new interpretation fits into Inca imperial strategy
Once the Band of Holes is seen as a logistics tool, it slots neatly into what we already know about Inca governance. The empire relied on a labor tax called mit’a, which required subject communities to contribute work, goods or both to state projects. To manage that flow without coinage or written ledgers, officials used a combination of quipus, storage complexes and checkpoints along the vast road system. A hillside grid of standardized pits would have been a logical addition, giving administrators a way to physically sort and count tribute as it moved from local producers to regional warehouses.
Several reports on the new findings stress that the site’s location near the Pisco Valley, a region known for agricultural production, would have made it an ideal place to aggregate and tally harvests before they were dispatched to highland centers. One account notes that the pattern of the band, with its repeating blocks of pits, could map onto the decimal structure of Inca administration, where households were grouped into units of ten, one hundred and so on. In that reading, each block of holes might correspond to a specific community’s quota, turning the hillside into a visible record of who had delivered what. Coverage of the study in the art and archaeology press underscores how this interpretation reframes the Band of Holes in Peru as a monument to bureaucratic power rather than a purely ritual or symbolic landscape.
Why earlier theories fell short, and what still remains unverified
Before the logistics hypothesis gained traction, the Band of Holes attracted a range of explanations that reflected both the limits of the data and the allure of a good mystery. Some researchers proposed that the pits were graves, pointing to other Andean sites where burials were cut into rock, while others suggested they might be agricultural features, perhaps for planting or water management. A few more speculative ideas linked the alignment of the rows to celestial events or ritual processions. As more systematic excavations and surveys were carried out, however, these theories ran into hard constraints: the lack of human remains, the unsuitability of the pits for long-term crop cultivation, and the absence of clear astronomical sightlines.
Recent syntheses of the evidence make clear that, while the new explanation is compelling, it is still a working model rather than a closed case. There is no surviving Inca text that explicitly describes a hillside counting grid, and no single artifact from the site that labels it as a checkpoint. Instead, the argument rests on converging lines of evidence: the physical form of the pits, their spatial relationship to roads and settlements, and their consistency with what is known about imperial administration. One overview of the debate notes that some details, such as exactly which goods were handled here or how often the site was used, remain unverified based on available sources, a reminder that even well-supported archaeological interpretations carry a degree of uncertainty.
Reading the hillside as a three-dimensional spreadsheet
What makes the Band of Holes so evocative is the way it invites us to imagine a different kind of information technology. Instead of ink on paper or numbers on a screen, the Inca appear to have used space itself as a medium for data, arranging pits, cords and pathways so that quantities and obligations could be read off the landscape. In this light, the hillside becomes a three-dimensional spreadsheet, where each cavity is a cell that can be filled or left empty to signal whether a quota has been met. Officials walking the rows could have tallied contributions at a glance, while messengers carried summaries onward via quipus.
That analogy is not just a metaphor. One recent analysis explicitly frames the site as an “Inca spreadsheet,” arguing that the regular blocks of pits and their relation to nearby infrastructure mirror how modern spreadsheets organize rows, columns and categories. The study suggests that the band may have been used to reconcile counts from different communities or to cross-check quipu records, adding redundancy to a system that had to function across rugged terrain and multiple languages. Reporting on this work highlights how the mysterious Andean holes push us to broaden our definition of record keeping, recognizing that complex accounting can take physical forms that leave no inked page behind.
Fieldwork, local knowledge and the long road to an answer
Behind the neatness of the new explanation lies years of patient fieldwork and collaboration with local communities who have lived alongside the Band of Holes for generations. Archaeologists have had to negotiate access to the site, balance preservation with excavation and integrate oral histories that, while not definitive, offer clues about how the landscape has been perceived over time. Some residents have long associated the pits with ancient authorities and the movement of goods, a memory that aligns suggestively with the logistics hypothesis even if it cannot be treated as direct testimony from Inca times.
Accounts of the recent research emphasize how teams combined on-the-ground measurements with interviews and archival work, building a layered picture of the site’s past and present. One report describes how researchers walked every segment of the band, recording subtle differences in construction and wear that might reflect changing use over time. Another notes that the project has sparked renewed interest in protecting the area from looting and unregulated tourism, now that the thousands of aligned holes are attracting global attention as a key to understanding Inca statecraft rather than just a curiosity for drone photographers.
Why solving this puzzle matters beyond one Peruvian hillside
It might be tempting to treat the Band of Holes as a niche concern, a specialized debate among Andean archaeologists. Yet the stakes are broader. If the new interpretation holds, it offers a rare, concrete glimpse into how a large empire managed information without writing in the alphabetic sense, relying instead on embodied practices and built environments. That has implications for how we think about state formation, economic planning and the diversity of human problem solving, especially in societies that have often been framed as “preliterate” or “without records.”
Recent coverage in science and technology outlets underscores this point, drawing parallels between the Inca system and modern efforts to visualize data in physical space, from warehouse layouts to urban logistics hubs. One article notes that the Band of Holes can be seen as an early experiment in large-scale information design, where the arrangement of pits encoded relationships between people, goods and obligations. Another highlights how the renewed attention to the site has prompted fresh comparisons with other Inca storage and counting facilities, suggesting that the mysterious holes in the Andes may be part of a wider pattern of landscape-based accounting that has yet to be fully mapped.
What comes next for research on the Band of Holes
Even as the logistics hypothesis gains momentum, researchers are clear that more work is needed to refine and test it. Future seasons of fieldwork are expected to focus on targeted excavations at key segments of the band, looking for microscopic residues that might reveal exactly what kinds of goods passed through the pits. There is also interest in expanding the remote sensing coverage to search for similar features elsewhere in the region, which could show whether the Band of Holes was a unique experiment or part of a standardized toolkit used across the empire.
Funding announcements and research previews suggest that interdisciplinary teams, combining archaeologists, data scientists and materials specialists, are already planning new analyses of the site’s construction sequence and use-life. One recent overview notes that the project has become a test case for how digital methods can transform our understanding of long-known but poorly understood monuments, with the 5,200 holes in southern Peru serving as a laboratory for techniques that could be applied across the Andes. Another summary of the ongoing work points out that the Band of Holes is now central to debates about how to interpret large-scale earthworks worldwide, from North American mounds to Central Asian kurgans, as potential instruments of governance rather than just ceremonial or funerary sites.
A new chapter in a very old story
For much of the modern era, the Band of Holes has existed in a kind of interpretive limbo, photographed and cataloged but not fully understood. The emerging consensus that it functioned as a counting and sorting station does not strip the site of its mystery so much as relocate it, from the question of “what is this?” to the deeper puzzle of how people without written ledgers built such an effective system of control. In that sense, the hillside is less an answer than an invitation to rethink what counts as a record, a spreadsheet or a database.
As new data accumulate and methods improve, the story of the Band of Holes will almost certainly be revised again, perhaps in ways that complicate or even overturn parts of the current model. For now, though, the convergence of archaeological, spatial and historical evidence has given the thousands of pits a plausible and powerful role in the machinery of the Inca state. The latest syntheses of the research, which bring together field observations, digital mapping and comparative analysis, present the once-enigmatic Peruvian holes as a reminder that even the most familiar landscapes can still surprise us when we learn to read them as archives of human ingenuity.
More from MorningOverview