Astronomers have uncovered a gargantuan black hole that appears to sit almost alone in space, with hardly any stars around it, hinting that it may be a relic from the universe’s earliest moments. If that interpretation holds, this starless “mega” black hole could have formed before the first galaxies, forcing a rethink of how quickly cosmic structure emerged after the Big Bang. I want to trace how this object fits into a broader pattern of unexpectedly massive, fast-growing black holes that are now challenging long‑standing theories.
The starless giant that should not exist
The most striking feature of the new candidate relic is not just its mass but its isolation. Observations indicate a gargantuan black hole, roughly 5 billion times the mass of the Sun, sitting in a region almost entirely devoid of stars, a configuration that standard galaxy formation models struggle to explain. Astronomers usually expect such monsters to anchor bright, bustling galaxies, yet in this case the central object looks more like a naked engine than the core of a mature system, which is why some researchers suspect it may be a surviving remnant from the dawn of the universe, as highlighted in reporting on the gargantuan black hole.
Researchers involved in the work, including Jan and other astronomers, argue that the lack of a surrounding stellar population is not a minor detail but the central clue. If the black hole had grown gradually inside a normal galaxy, it should be embedded in a dense halo of old stars, gas, and dark matter. Instead, the environment looks stripped down, as if the black hole formed in a very different era and then somehow avoided the usual galactic build‑up. That is why some teams now talk about a “starless” or nearly starless mega black hole, a phrase that captures both the observational puzzle and the possibility that we are seeing a fossil from a time before galaxies as we know them had fully taken shape.
Abell 2744-QSO1 and the “starless monster” idea
The case for an ancient origin is strengthened by another extreme object, located in the galaxy Abell 2744‑QSO1, that has been described as a starless monster black hole. In that system, the central engine appears to dominate its surroundings so completely that the usual markers of a mature galaxy are hard to find, which is why some researchers suggest it may be older than the first galaxies themselves. Reporting on this target, framed under the headline This Starless Monster Black Hole May Be Older Than the First Galaxies, emphasizes how a black hole without stars presents a direct challenge to standard scenarios in which galaxies form first and central black holes grow later.
In that discussion, the phrase “Black Hole Without Stars” is not just rhetorical flair, it encapsulates the core tension with prevailing theory. If the central object in Abell 2744‑QSO1 really lacks a substantial stellar host, then the usual sequence of gas collapsing into stars, then into a galaxy, and only then feeding a central black hole, may not apply. Instead, the data hint at a path where a massive black hole forms very early, perhaps from the direct collapse of primordial gas, and only slowly accumulates or even fails to accumulate a normal galactic envelope. For theorists like Stan and others who have spent careers refining hierarchical galaxy formation models, that is a direct challenge, forcing them to ask what kind of early‑universe physics could produce such a configuration.
Why early black holes are so hard to grow
To understand why these starless giants are so provocative, it helps to recall how difficult it should be to grow a supermassive black hole in the young universe. In standard models, black holes accrete gas and dust from their surroundings, but as material falls in, it heats up and shines, producing radiation that pushes back on the inflowing matter. This balance is encapsulated in what astrophysicists call the Eddington limit, a theoretical cap on how fast a black hole can feed before its own light chokes off the supply, a concept explored in detail in work on The Eddington limit and early feeding frenzies.
Because of that limit, growing a black hole from a stellar‑mass seed to billions of solar masses should take a significant fraction of the universe’s age, even if the object accretes continuously at the maximum allowed rate. Yet observations now reveal supermassive black holes that appear fully formed when the cosmos was still in its infancy, leaving very little time for such growth. The starless mega black hole and the object in Abell 2744‑QSO1 push this tension to the extreme, because they seem both enormous and embedded in environments that do not show the expected signs of prolonged, Eddington‑limited feeding. That mismatch between theory and observation is what makes some astronomers consider more exotic origins, including the possibility that some black holes formed with very large initial masses.
Feeding frenzies that defy the theoretical limit
One way to sidestep the time crunch is to ask whether the Eddington limit is as strict in practice as the textbooks suggest. Observations of a supermassive black hole in the early universe that appears to be on a feeding frenzy suggest that, under some conditions, accretion can proceed at rates that effectively bypass the usual cap. In that case, the central object seems to be gulping material so rapidly that the outward pressure of radiation fails to shut off the inflow, a scenario described as a supermassive black hole on a rate exceeding the theoretical limit and linked to observations utilizing the James Webb Space Telescope, or JWST.
In that study, the team reported that the black hole was gulping material roughly 40 times faster than the classical Eddington rate, a finding that, if confirmed, would dramatically shorten the time needed to build up a billion‑solar‑mass object. The fact that such extreme accretion appears in the early universe suggests that dense gas reservoirs and particular geometries, such as thick accretion disks or anisotropic radiation fields, might allow black holes to grow in short, violent bursts. For the starless mega black hole, a history of such super‑Eddington episodes could, in principle, explain its enormous mass without invoking exotic seeds, although the lack of a surrounding galaxy still demands an additional twist in the story.
LID-568 and the hunt for hidden early monsters
Another piece of the puzzle comes from X‑ray observations that reveal fast‑feeding black holes hidden among thousands of distant sources. One such object, identified as LID‑568, was found using the Chandra X‑ray Observatory’s COSMOS legacy survey, where it had been lurking unnoticed among a crowded field. The black hole, called LID‑568, appears to be accreting matter at a rate that pushes or even exceeds the usual balance between gravity and radiation, again hinting that early black holes may have grown more quickly than once thought.
What makes LID‑568 particularly relevant to the starless mega black hole is the way it was discovered. Rather than standing out as a bright quasar in visible light, it emerged from careful analysis of high‑energy X‑ray data, suggesting that many early black holes could be heavily obscured or embedded in complex environments. If a significant population of such fast‑feeding objects exists, then the starless giant might not be a lone anomaly but the most extreme example of a broader class. The Chandra and COSMOS results show that when astronomers look with the right tools, they can uncover black holes that had been effectively invisible, a reminder that our current census of early cosmic monsters is likely incomplete.
Webb’s view of accreting giants in young galaxies
While some early black holes appear almost naked, others sit at the centers of compact, rapidly forming galaxies that JWST is now resolving in unprecedented detail. In one case, the Webb telescope captured spectral features that provided clear signs of an accreting black hole at the centre of a young galaxy, revealing both the hot gas swirling around the object and the impact of its radiation on the host. The team behind that work emphasized how Webb can disentangle the light from stars and the light from the accretion disk, allowing a much cleaner measurement of the black hole’s growth rate.
These observations show that, even in the early universe, some black holes are already tightly coupled to their host galaxies, shaping star formation and gas flows through powerful outflows and radiation. That picture contrasts sharply with the starless mega black hole, which seems to lack a substantial stellar companion, but the physics of accretion is likely similar in both cases. By comparing systems where the black hole and galaxy grow together with those where the black hole appears to have raced ahead, astronomers can test whether the starless giant represents an extreme tail of the same distribution or a fundamentally different formation channel. Webb’s ability to probe faint, distant galaxies is central to that comparative approach.
Unexpectedly massive black holes in small galaxies
Even when galaxies are clearly present, their central black holes often look too big for their surroundings, at least according to long‑standing scaling relations. Work led by Experts such as Fabio Pacucci has shown that JWST has revealed supermassive black holes that appear too massive for the small galaxies that host them in the distant universe. In these systems, the central object can account for a surprisingly large fraction of the galaxy’s total mass, a pattern documented in studies of unexpectedly massive black holes dominating small galaxies.
For me, these overgrown central engines look like intermediate steps on a continuum that stretches from ordinary galaxy–black‑hole pairs to the extreme case of a starless mega black hole. If black holes can outpace their hosts in relatively modest systems, it becomes easier to imagine scenarios where the host never quite catches up, leaving a massive remnant with only a sparse stellar entourage. The fact that JWST, NASA’s latest flagship observatory, keeps turning up such mismatched pairs suggests that the co‑evolution of galaxies and black holes is more varied than the neat correlations derived from nearby, mature galaxies would imply. That diversity in growth histories is a crucial backdrop for interpreting the starless giant.
Primordial black holes and relics from before the first stars
The most radical explanation for the starless mega black hole is that it did not grow from a stellar remnant at all but instead formed directly in the early universe as a primordial black hole. In this scenario, density fluctuations in the hot, dense plasma shortly after the Big Bang could have collapsed under their own gravity, bypassing the need for stars or galaxies. Some researchers have argued that a newly discovered black hole could be an ancient relic of this kind, potentially formed before the first stars and galaxies, a possibility raised in reporting that invites readers to Read more about such primordial candidates.
If the starless mega black hole is indeed a primordial relic, it would provide a rare observational window into physics at energies far beyond what particle accelerators can reach. Its mass, environment, and growth history would all carry imprints of conditions in the first fractions of a second after the Big Bang. However, proving that origin is extremely challenging, because later accretion and mergers can erase many of the initial signatures. Astronomers must therefore rely on indirect clues, such as the absence of a normal host galaxy, the object’s location in large‑scale structure, and its comparison with other early black holes, to argue that a primordial seed is the most plausible explanation.
Defying physics: when black holes grow 40 times faster
Even if primordial seeds exist, the observed masses of early black holes still often require periods of extraordinarily rapid growth. One striking example is a low‑mass supermassive black hole that appears to be devouring material 40 times faster than expected, a case described under the banner Defying Physics, with the object labelled as a supermassive black hole that devours 40x faster than expected. In that work, the authors explicitly ask, “What is this?” as they confront a system that seems to violate the usual assumptions about how radiation pressure regulates accretion, a tension captured in the phrase Defying Physics and “Supermassive Black Hole Devours” “Faster Than Expected” “What”.
For the starless mega black hole, such episodes of extreme feeding could be the missing ingredient that bridges the gap between a plausible seed mass and the observed gargantuan scale. If a black hole can spend even a small fraction of its life accreting at tens of times the Eddington rate, its growth curve steepens dramatically. The challenge for theorists is to identify the physical conditions that allow such runaway accretion without blowing away the fuel supply, and to determine how common those conditions were in the early universe. The existence of at least one object that appears to be in such a state today suggests that the underlying physics is real, not just a theoretical curiosity.
What the starless mega black hole means for cosmic history
Pulling these threads together, I see the starless mega black hole as both an outlier and a signpost. On one hand, its apparent lack of a substantial stellar host sets it apart from the majority of known supermassive black holes, even those in small or irregular galaxies. On the other hand, it fits into a growing pattern of evidence that black holes in the early universe could form earlier, grow faster, and outpace their surroundings more dramatically than standard models predicted. From Abell 2744‑QSO1’s starless monster to LID‑568’s hidden X‑ray glow, from JWST’s unexpectedly massive black holes in small galaxies to feeding frenzies that skirt or shatter the Eddington limit, the observational landscape now points toward a more chaotic and diverse early cosmos.
For cosmology, that shift has profound implications. If some black holes truly predate the first galaxies, then the sequence of structure formation may need to be rewritten, with gravitational wells carved by massive seeds guiding the later assembly of stars and gas rather than simply emerging from them. Such a picture would affect everything from the reionization history of the universe to the distribution of dark matter on small scales. As new data arrive from JWST, Chandra, and future observatories, I expect the starless mega black hole to serve as a benchmark case, a reminder that the universe’s earliest chapters may have been dominated by invisible giants long before the first galaxies lit up the dark.
More from Morning Overview