
Scientists have turned a long-standing sci‑fi idea into working hardware, using pure light to move data wirelessly through the air instead of relying on radio waves or copper traces. The result is a new class of communication and computing systems that treat photons as the main carriers of information, from room‑scale networking to chips that route signals with beams instead of electrons. I see this shift as more than a speed upgrade, it is a structural change in how the internet and computers themselves are built.
At the same time, the familiar glass strands under our streets are being pushed far beyond their original design, with researchers squeezing more capacity out of existing optical fiber and experimenting with new photonic components. The same physics that lets a desk lamp become a data hotspot is also reshaping data centers and long‑haul networks, pointing toward a future where light, not electricity, does most of the heavy lifting.
From copper to photons: how we got here
For most of the internet era, the pattern was simple: light for long distances, electricity for everything else. Fiber‑optic cables carried laser pulses across oceans, but inside devices and buildings, copper wires and radio antennas still dominated. That division is now breaking down as engineers push light deeper into the stack, from backbone links to local wireless and even on‑chip logic. I see this as the culmination of decades of work in photonics finally intersecting with the practical limits of traditional electronics.
The roots of this transition go back to early experiments in Photonic communication, which used light to transmit data instead of copper conductors. Those systems emerged from studies of lasers and optical fibers in the 1960s and 1970s, then matured into the global fiber networks that now underpin the web. The same principles that made glass strands more efficient than metal wires are now being miniaturized and adapted for short‑range links and processing, replacing less efficient copper paths inside computers and buildings.
Light as a wireless signal: LiFi steps into the room
Turning light into a wireless medium means treating every LED as a potential access point. Rather than broadcasting radio waves, a LiFi system modulates the intensity of a lamp faster than the human eye can detect, encoding bits into subtle flickers that a receiver can decode. In practice, that lets a ceiling fixture or desk lamp behave like a high‑speed router, but with a signal that stays confined to the illuminated space instead of bleeding through walls.
Technically, LiFi, short for light fidelity, is a wireless communication technology that uses the visible, ultraviolet and infrared spectrums to transmit data, relying on light to transmit data rather than radio. Because the usable optical spectrum is far wider than the crowded radio bands, LiFi can, in principle, support very high throughput and dense reuse in offices, aircraft cabins or hospitals. I see its tight spatial confinement as both a security advantage and a design constraint, forcing network planners to think in terms of beams and pools of illumination instead of omnidirectional coverage.
Inside the lab: pure‑light internet links
The most striking demonstrations of this shift are experimental links that send internet traffic through free‑space light instead of fiber or Wi‑Fi. In these setups, a transmitter converts digital data into rapid changes in a laser or LED beam, which a photodetector across the room or across a rooftop gap turns back into electrical signals. The effect for the user is familiar, a fast connection, but the underlying physics is closer to a fiber link without the glass in between.
Researchers have shown that our existing optical infrastructure still has headroom, with experiments that make the internet faster in ways that feel almost like a magic trick. One widely shared demonstration explained how current optical fiber cables that carry global traffic can be upgraded by changing how light is encoded and multiplexed, effectively giving the network a major speed boost without digging new trenches, as highlighted in a Sep explainer about the internet getting a major upgrade. I see these lab‑to‑field transitions as crucial, because they prove that pure‑light communication is not just a futuristic overlay, it can be layered onto the infrastructure we already have.
Optical chips: when processors speak in light
Wireless links are only half the story, the other half is what happens once the data reaches a device. Traditional processors shuffle electrons through transistors and copper traces, generating heat and consuming power with every switch. Optical chips flip that model by routing and processing information with photons, using waveguides, modulators and detectors etched into silicon or other materials. The result is hardware that can, in specific tasks, move data with far less energy per bit.
One prototype highlighted by Sep coverage uses light instead of electricity on a computer chip, and it is said to consume 30 times less energy and be up to 50 times faster than comparable electronic designs. That kind of gain is not a marginal tweak, it is a step change that could reshape data center economics and edge devices if it scales. In parallel, the broader field of Optical computing, also known as photonic computing, uses light waves produced by lasers or other sources for data processing, storage and communication, often in hybrid systems that combine photonic interconnects with conventional logic. I see these chips as the natural companions to light‑based networking, creating an end‑to‑end photonic path from sensor to server.
Why light beats radio and copper on performance
The appeal of pure‑light communication is rooted in physics. Photons have no rest mass and do not experience electrical resistance, so they can travel through suitable media with far less energy loss than electrons in metal. In fibers or free space, multiple wavelengths can be multiplexed in parallel, turning a single path into many virtual channels. That is why a single strand of glass can carry enormous volumes of traffic, and why modulated LEDs can, in principle, deliver multi‑gigabit links across a room.
Compared with radio, the optical spectrum offers orders of magnitude more bandwidth, which translates into higher potential data rates and more room for dense reuse. LiFi systems that use visible, ultraviolet and infrared bands can pack many independent channels into the same physical space, as described in technical overviews of light fidelity. On chips, photonic interconnects avoid the capacitive loading and crosstalk that limit electrical traces, which is why designs that move signals with light can reach the 30 times lower energy and up to 50 times faster regime reported in the Sep chip demonstration. In my view, these advantages are not about raw speed alone, they are about sustaining performance as systems scale without hitting thermal and interference walls.
Security, privacy and the physics of containment
Using light as a carrier changes the threat model for wireless networks. Radio waves leak through walls and floors, which is convenient for coverage but problematic for eavesdropping and interference. Optical signals, by contrast, are line‑of‑sight or at least confined to the illuminated volume, which makes casual interception harder but also means coverage must be planned more carefully. I see this as a trade‑off that favors high‑security environments where physical control of space is already tight.
LiFi’s reliance on visible, ultraviolet and infrared beams means that data stays within the cone of light, a property that can reduce the risk of external snooping compared with conventional Wi‑Fi, as outlined in descriptions of LiFi technology. In practice, that could make it attractive for aircraft cabins, hospital wards or industrial sites where radio use is restricted or where sensitive data must not leave a room. At the same time, the need for clear optical paths introduces new failure modes, from someone blocking a beam to a light being switched off, which network designers will have to mitigate with redundancy and hybrid radio‑optical setups.
Where pure‑light links could show up first
The earliest mainstream deployments of light‑based wireless are likely to appear in controlled indoor spaces where lighting is already dense and centrally managed. Office buildings, co‑working hubs and university campuses can retrofit ceiling fixtures with LiFi transmitters, turning every meeting room into a high‑capacity cell that offloads traffic from congested Wi‑Fi. I expect early adopters to be organizations that already invest heavily in secure networking, such as financial firms and research labs, because the incremental cost of smart lighting is easier to justify against their bandwidth and privacy needs.
On the infrastructure side, telecom operators and cloud providers are experimenting with free‑space optical links to bridge gaps where laying new fiber is impractical. The same principles that let Sep researchers upgrade existing optical fiber without replacing cables can be adapted to rooftop relays and backhaul links, using tightly aligned beams to connect towers or buildings. In parallel, data centers are testing photonic interconnects between racks and within servers, building on decades of work in Optical computing and Photonic communication to replace short copper runs with fiber or on‑board waveguides. Those environments, with their controlled layouts and high traffic density, are natural testbeds for pure‑light networking.
The roadblocks: fragility, standards and cost
Despite the excitement, pure‑light communication faces real obstacles before it can rival Wi‑Fi or 5G in everyday life. Optical links are inherently more fragile in the face of physical obstructions, whether that is a person walking through a beam or a door closing between a lamp and a laptop. Reflections and scattering can help in some cases, but the basic requirement for a reasonably clear path remains. I see this as a reminder that physics does not hand out free lunches, every new medium comes with its own quirks.
Standardization and economics are just as important. For LiFi to become a default feature in phones, laptops and routers, industry groups will need to agree on modulation schemes, security protocols and coexistence rules with existing lighting systems. Chip‑level photonics, including the kind of designs that achieve 30 times lower energy and up to 50 times faster operation in the Sep optical chip, must be manufactured at scale and integrated into existing software stacks. Until those pieces line up, pure‑light systems will remain specialized tools, powerful in the right niches but not yet a universal replacement for the radio‑and‑copper world we know.
More from Morning Overview