Samsung has stopped pretending this is a polite rivalry. From hardware design to AI strategy to full-page newspaper jabs, the company is openly positioning itself as the alternative to Apple, and it is doing it with a mix of imitation, innovation, and calculated trolling. The result is a tech cold war where the shots are public, the stakes are global market share, and the subtext is that Samsung is tired of playing second in a game it helped build.
What is emerging now is not just another round of smartphone one‑upmanship, but a broader contest over who defines the next era of personal tech. Samsung is coming straight at Apple on design, on AI, on wearables, and even on the supply chain that powers future iPhones, while still quietly supplying some of the parts that make those iPhones possible.
Samsung’s trolling era: from hashtags to brutal launch-day jabs
Samsung has always enjoyed poking at Apple, but the tone has hardened into something closer to a running campaign. When Apple introduced iPhone 17, Samsung did not wait for reviewers to weigh in. Instead, it jumped onto X with a pointed #iCant hashtag, mocking the fact that the iPhone 17 still cannot fold and highlighting that features Apple was celebrating already exist in Samsung Galaxy devices. The message was simple: Apple is late to ideas Samsung has already shipped.
The same energy carried into the launch of the Galaxy S25 Edge, where Samsung used its own flagship reveal to take another swing. In a widely shared video titled “Samsung Just TROLLED Apple, And It’s Brutal,” the company framed the new Galaxy S25 Edge Samsung not just as another premium phone, but as a direct answer to Apple’s playbook, leaning into the Galaxy and Edge Samsung branding while drawing explicit contrasts with iPhone design and capabilities in a way that felt more like a roast than a product demo, a tone captured in the Galaxy S25 Edge clip.
Ad wars: “Creativity cannot be crushed” and the rise of petty as strategy
Samsung’s trolling is not confined to social media or launch events, it is now baked into its advertising. After Why Apple sparked backlash with an iPad spot that showed creative tools literally being crushed in a hydraulic press, Samsung responded with its own “Creativity cannot be crushed” ad. The counter‑spot showed a musician picking up a guitar and other analog tools from the wreckage, then using a Samsung device to create, turning Why Apple’s misstep into a statement that Samsung is on the side of artists and everyday makers, a narrative that was unpacked in coverage of the “Creativity cannot be crushed” response.
That ad fits into a broader pattern where Samsung’s marketing has become its own genre, built around mocking Apple. Commentators have described Samsung’s ads as sharp, petty, and absolutely intentional, a style that treats Apple as the straight man in a long‑running comedy bit. Every time Apple leans into minimalist design or lofty language about innovation, Samsung counters with a spot that calls out missing features, awkward design choices, or cultural misreads, a pattern summed up in an analysis of how Samsung’s ads mocking Apple have evolved into a recognizable sub‑brand of their own.
Design convergence: when “clones” become a competitive weapon
For all the trolling, Samsung is also moving closer to Apple in pure hardware aesthetics, and critics have noticed. The Galaxy Buds 3 Pro do not even try to look unique, with the overall shape, stem, case, and even pricing structure drawing direct comparisons to Apple’s earbuds. Reviewers have argued that the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro feel less like an original design than Apple’s, and that the resemblance is so strong it collapses the usual distinction between “inspired by” and “copied,” a point made bluntly in coverage of The Galaxy Buds 3 Pro.
The same accusations surfaced around the Galaxy Watch Ultra and Buds 3, which were criticized as “cloning” Apple products after their Unpacked debut. Commentators pointed out that the Galaxy Watch Ultra’s case shape and rugged aesthetic track closely with Apple’s own ultra‑tier watch, while the Buds 3 again echo Apple’s stemmed earbud silhouette. The criticism is that Samsung is leaning on Apple’s visual language to signal premium status, a charge that was sharpened in reporting that framed the Galaxy Watch Ultra and Buds 3 as Apple clones rather than bold new designs.
Leaked phones and folding flex: where Samsung still leads
Even as Samsung borrows from Apple’s design language, it is also pushing into spaces where Apple has yet to follow. A leak around the Galaxy S26 Ultra suggests that Samsung is planning a design shift that takes cues from the iPhone 17 Pro Max, with a tipster saying the new design looks more like the metal rings around the cameras on the iPhone 17 Pro Max and that Samsung is clearly taking inspiration from its biggest rival. That same leak underscores how closely the two flagships are now judged against each other, with the Galaxy S26 Ultra’s camera housing and frame expected to echo Apple’s proportions, a detail captured in reporting on the Pro Max inspired design.
Where Samsung still draws a hard line is on folding and form factor experimentation. The #iCant campaign around iPhone 17 was not just a meme, it was a reminder that Apple still does not sell a foldable phone while Samsung has multiple generations of foldable Galaxy devices in the market. That confidence shows up in product positioning too, with Samsung using its Galaxy S25 Edge to showcase a super‑slim profile and curved edges that reviewers say arrived ahead of Apple’s rumored iPhone Air in terms of timeline, a point underlined by a phone critic who noted that Samsung was swift out the gate with its Galaxy S25 Edge versus Apple’s iPhone Air.
AI Living vs walled gardens: Samsung’s big bet on ecosystem
Samsung is not just chasing Apple on hardware, it is trying to redefine the ecosystem story around AI. At its CES 2026 Press Conference, the company framed its strategy under the banner “Samsung Embraces AI Living Vision at CES 2026 Press Conference,” pitching a “Your Companion to AI Living” theme that ties together TVs, appliances, phones, and wearables. The idea is that AI should live across the home and on the go, with Samsung positioning its devices as a seamless mesh of services rather than a set of isolated gadgets, a vision laid out in detail in the Samsung Embraces AI Living Vision CES Press Conference.
Behind that marketing is a deeper strategic push. Analysts describe Samsung as operating in a complex competitive environment that forces it into a difficult position, where it must engage in a high‑cost race to lead in semiconductor manufacturing, consumer devices, and AI software all at once. The company’s answer is tight integration and cutting‑edge features like Galaxy AI, which it hopes can differentiate its phones and home products from Apple’s more tightly controlled ecosystem, a strategy outlined in an assessment of Samsung’s AI strategy.
Shipments, status, and the newspaper flex
Market share is the scoreboard behind all this posturing, and Samsung is acutely aware of how close Apple is. Reporting on global shipments has warned that Samsung Electronics is facing mounting challenges in the smartphone market, with Apple poised to overtake the top spot as economic pressures and soaring component costs squeeze margins. That context matters when Samsung leans into aggressive marketing, because it is not just about brand personality, it is about defending a leadership position that analysts say is under real threat, a dynamic captured in coverage of how Samsung Electronics and Apple are jockeying for 2025 shipments.
Samsung has even taken that fight to the front page. In a newspaper ad shared widely online, the company used a bold layout to remind readers that while everyone talks about design and cameras, Samsung has shipped more smartphones than Apple and taken the lead in the market, while also nudging buyers to think about services and future upgrades. The copy read like a scoreboard update disguised as a brand manifesto, and the post that amplified it highlighted how While Samsung and Apple argue over aesthetics, volume still matters.
Copycat or co‑architect? The messy reality of Apple–Samsung dependence
For all the public sniping, Apple and Samsung are deeply entangled behind the scenes. Analysts have noted that mass production of image sensors for the iPhone 18 next year is expected to reduce losses in Samsung’s semiconductor division, with Kiwoom Securities analyst Park Yu‑ak pointing out that this kind of supply deal helps stabilize Samsung’s chip business even as it competes with Apple in phones. The arrangement underscores how mass sensor production for iPhone 18 is as important to Samsung’s bottom line as any Galaxy launch.
The relationship goes further. Reports say the deal between Apple and Samsung for the iPhone 18 camera was finalized in August, with Apple and Samsung positioning the agreement to support U.S. based manufacturing for critical iPhone components. That means future iPhones could ship with cameras made by Samsung in the USA, even as the two brands fight for the same premium customers, a paradox highlighted in coverage of how Apple and Samsung structured the iPhone 18 camera deal.
The secret kitchen: rivals who “cook together”
The supply chain overlap is not a footnote, it is central to how both companies operate. Commentators have pointed out that Apple and Samsung are known as big rivals in the smartphone world, but in reality their relationship is much more complicated, with each depending on the other behind the scenes. One widely shared explainer put it bluntly, saying Apple and Samsung actually secretly cook together, because Apple relies on Samsung for components like displays and sensors while Samsung benefits from Apple’s massive orders to keep its fabs full, a dynamic captured in a short video about how Apple and Samsung depend on each other.
That interdependence makes Samsung’s public aggression more interesting, because every jab at Apple is also a reminder to regulators and partners that the two giants are not interchangeable. Samsung wants to be seen as the co‑architect of the smartphone era, not just the manufacturer behind Apple’s glass. By loudly mocking Apple’s design choices and timelines while quietly building the sensors and cameras that power future iPhones, Samsung is trying to claim both roles at once, competitor and collaborator, and to turn that dual identity into leverage in negotiations over everything from component pricing to joint manufacturing in the United States.
The product blitz: flooding shelves to crowd out iPhones
Beyond the big flagships and headline‑grabbing ads, Samsung is also waging a quieter war in the aisles of carriers and electronics chains. Its catalog spans a dense grid of phones, tablets, wearables, and accessories that are often positioned just a price tier below Apple’s equivalents, giving sales staff and shoppers a ready alternative. That strategy shows up in the way Samsung seeds multiple product variants into the same segment, making it harder for Apple’s more streamlined lineup to dominate shelf space.
The same pattern appears in wearables and audio, where Samsung has rolled out overlapping watches and earbuds that mirror Apple’s tiers while offering slightly different bundles or promotions. Listings for Samsung’s accessories show how the company uses a mix of colors, case styles, and limited editions to keep its product lineup feeling fresh, even when the underlying hardware is only iterating. It is a saturation play, designed to ensure that wherever an iPhone or Apple Watch appears, a Galaxy alternative is within arm’s reach.
Owning the midrange: where volume meets AI
Samsung’s push is not limited to the premium tier where Apple dominates, it is also about locking down the midrange and entry segments that drive global volume. The company has been methodical about refreshing its A‑series and other affordable lines with features that used to be reserved for flagships, then tying those devices into the same Galaxy AI and SmartThings ecosystem as its top‑end phones. Retail listings for these devices show how Samsung positions each product tier as a gateway into its broader AI Living vision.
That matters because Apple’s walled garden is strongest at the high end, where iMessage, FaceTime, and tight hardware‑software integration keep users locked in. Samsung is betting that if it can deliver credible AI features, long software support, and cross‑device convenience at lower price points, it can win first‑time smartphone buyers and budget‑conscious upgraders before they ever enter Apple’s orbit. In that sense, the loud trolling and Apple‑like designs are only the surface layer of a deeper strategy: flood the market with capable Galaxy devices, tie them together with Galaxy AI and SmartThings, and make sure that when Apple finally moves into foldables or more aggressive AI features, Samsung already feels like the default alternative.
More from Morning Overview