Electric vehicles promise low running costs and cleaner streets, yet many drivers discover their range shrinking long before the car itself feels old. The culprit is not just vague “wear and tear” but specific microscopic failures inside the battery that cause cracks, chemical chaos and, eventually, lost capacity. Researchers are now mapping those hidden flaws in unprecedented detail, and their findings are starting to explain why some of the most advanced EV cells age faster than expected.
What they are uncovering is a story of stressed crystal lattices, restless oxygen atoms and metal ions that wander into places they should never be. I see a clear pattern emerging: the same structural weaknesses that unlock high energy and fast charging also make batteries mechanically fragile. Understanding that tradeoff is the first step toward EV packs that keep most of their range for hundreds of thousands of kilometers instead of fading after a few hard years.
Why EV batteries lose capacity even when you “do everything right”
From the driver’s seat, early battery fade can feel mysterious. You might avoid fast charging, keep your Tesla Model 3 or Hyundai Ioniq 5 in the recommended state-of-charge window and still watch usable range slip away. Part of the answer is that even a perfectly treated cell will gradually lose active lithium and structural integrity over thousands of cycles, a process that specialists simply call battery degradation. As one technical review of sodium and lithium systems notes, it is important to recognize that even with pristine care of a perfectly designed battery there will be a gradual loss of capacity over time, a slow decline that is inherent to the chemistry and is explicitly referred to as battery degradation.
On top of that unavoidable baseline, there are design choices and usage patterns that accelerate damage. High nickel cathodes, ultra-fast charging and aggressive depth-of-discharge targets all push more ions in and out of the crystal lattice, which increases mechanical stress and chemical side reactions. Consumer advice pieces now routinely warn EV owners that repeated 100 percent charges, frequent DC fast charging and long periods at very high or very low state of charge can make an EV battery die fast, even if the car is only a few years old, and they offer practical steps such as limiting fast-charge sessions and using scheduled charging to slow that decline, as laid out in guides to easy fixes for 2025.
The promise and problem of single-crystal cathodes
To stretch EV range, cell makers have been moving from older polycrystalline cathodes to so-called single-crystal designs that pack more nickel and less cobalt into each particle. In theory, a single, continuous crystal should be tougher because it avoids the weak grain boundaries that can crack in traditional materials. That is why single-crystal lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide has been marketed as a premium option for long-range models from brands like BMW and Lucid. Yet in practice, these cells have not always delivered the expected durability, and some have shown puzzling cracking and capacity fade despite their cleaner microstructure.
Researchers digging into this puzzle recently described a major breakthrough in battery science that reveals why promising single-crystal lithium-ion batteries have not lived up to their hype. They found that the material needs for these cells are almost the opposite of what engineers learned to optimize in older polycrystalline cathodes, a contrast they framed as opposite material needs for single-crystal batteries. In polycrystalline designs, cobalt was used to tame a problem called Li/Ni disorder, but in single-crystal particles that same cobalt content actually promotes cracking, which helps explain why some of the most advanced EV cells have been failing earlier than expected.
The hidden cracking flaw scientists finally pinned down
The most striking new insight is that the very element long used to stabilize high-energy cathodes, cobalt, can become a structural saboteur in single-crystal form. By carefully imaging and modeling how these particles charge and discharge, scientists showed that cobalt-rich regions experience uneven lattice changes that concentrate stress. Over hundreds of cycles, those stresses open up microcracks that let electrolyte seep in, corrode the interior and isolate chunks of active material from the rest of the electrode. What looks like a solid crystal from the outside is, internally, starting to fracture into dead islands that no longer store charge.
One team summarized the tradeoff bluntly: cobalt actually causes cracking, but was needed to mitigate Li/Ni disorder in earlier generations of cathodes. By building and testing a series of compositions with different cobalt and nickel ratios, they were able to separate those two effects and show that the cracking problem could be solved without bringing back the disorder that hurts performance. Their work, described as solving a hidden battery cracking mystery that shortens lifespan and raises fire risk in electric vehicles and other advanced technologies, points toward cobalt-lean recipes that keep the lattice stable without the same mechanical penalty, as detailed in the report on how cobalt actually causes cracking.
How “breathing” electrodes and volume swings tear cells apart
Even when the chemistry is tuned perfectly, the basic act of charging and discharging makes battery materials expand and contract. High-capacity electrodes, including the nickel-rich cathodes and silicon-heavy anodes that automakers are eyeing for next-generation packs, can change volume significantly as ions move in and out. A comprehensive review of solid-state batteries notes that with high-capacity electrode materials these volume fluctuations might be significant in every charge-discharge cycle, potentially subjecting the battery to mechanical stress that accumulates over time and eventually leads to cracks and delamination, a risk that is explicitly highlighted in the discussion of how volume fluctuations might be significant.
In liquid-electrolyte EV cells, that breathing behavior shows up as tiny thickness changes in the electrodes and separator, which can open up voids or squeeze components against each other. One recent analysis of lithium-ion packs described how batteries lose charge when they “breathe”, with researchers finding that repeated expansion and contraction during cycling degrades the electrode structure and that smarter electrode design could improve durability by accommodating that motion. The same work, highlighted in a feature that also touched on Lucid’s Gravity and other EV developments, reported that batteries lose charge when they breathe, a vivid phrase for a very physical problem that designers now have to engineer around.
Cracks, hot spots and how degradation shows up in the lab
To move from theory to practical fixes, engineers need to see where and when damage starts inside a working cell. Infrared imaging has become a powerful tool for that job, because cracks and failing regions often heat up differently from healthy material during fast charging or heavy discharge. In an experimental study on early detection of secondary battery degradation, researchers linked the appearance of hot spots to the expansion of primary particles during repeated cycles and to the formation of cracks between those particles. They concluded that this expansion during charging and discharging, and the resulting fractures, could be clearly tracked with thermal signatures, a link they emphasized when noting that this can be attributed to the expansion of the primary particles during repeated cycles and that, furthermore, the cracks between particles grow with continued charging and discharging.
Those lab observations match what EV owners experience as uneven cell behavior in a pack. A module with several cracked cells might heat up faster during a DC fast charge, forcing the car’s thermal management system to slow the session or cap the maximum state of charge. Over time, the battery management system will start to “hide” the weakest cells by reducing the usable capacity window, which shows up on the dashboard as a lower range estimate. That is why some drivers notice that their car still charges to “100 percent” but the number of kilometers available has quietly dropped, a symptom of internal damage that tools like infrared imaging are now helping engineers quantify and, eventually, prevent.
Oxygen loss, metal migration and the chemistry behind fading voltage
Mechanical cracks are only part of the story. At the atomic level, high-energy cathodes also suffer from oxygen loss and metal migration that permanently reduce voltage. When oxygen atoms leave the lattice during aggressive charging, the surrounding manganese, nickel and cobalt atoms do not stay put. Instead, they shuffle into new positions, blocking the pathways that lithium ions use and lowering the average voltage of the cell. One detailed study described how, when oxygen leaves, surrounding manganese, nickel and cobalt atoms migrate and that all the atoms are dancing out of their ideal sites, a vivid way to explain why the structure becomes less efficient at storing energy over time, as captured in the analysis of how when oxygen leaves, all the atoms are dancing.
Another subtle but damaging process kicks in when a pack is pushed into overdischarge, for example by running it to zero and then leaving it in that state. Under those conditions, the copper current collector on the anode side can start to dissolve, releasing ions that drift across the electrolyte. A combined structural and chemical study of NCM cathodes under overdischarge found that dissolved copper ions migrate to the cathode, where they are reduced to metallic copper that deposits inside the structure. The authors noted that dissolved Cu 2+ migrates to the cathode, where reduction causes metallic deposition, and that this migration disrupts the cathode structure and can cause severe internal damage that further shortens the battery’s lifespan, a chain of events spelled out in their description of how dissolved Cu migrates to the cathode.
New experiments that finally explain early capacity fade
Several groups have now combined these mechanical and chemical insights into a more complete picture of why EV cells lose capacity faster than expected. One collaboration involving the University of Colorado Boulder used advanced microscopy and modeling to show how tiny structural changes in the cathode accumulate into measurable capacity loss. They reported that batteries lose capacity over time even when the cause is not fully understood, then linked that fade to specific nanoscale rearrangements in nickel-rich materials. Their work, supported by partners in Taiwan and the Ministry of Education, was framed as a discovery that could lead to longer-lasting EV batteries, and it underscored how targeted tweaks to composition and processing might slow the onset of those structural changes, as described in the report on a discovery that could lead to longer-lasting EV batteries.
Another line of research has focused specifically on why single-crystal cathodes, which should in theory be more robust, sometimes crack and fade. US scientists used a combination of imaging and electrochemical testing to uncover the hidden flaw causing these batteries to crack and degrade, showing that the stress patterns in single-crystal particles are very different from those in polycrystalline ones. They found that the same design rules that worked for older materials did not always translate, which is why single-crystal cells did not always perform better in real EV duty cycles. Their findings, summarized as new research that reveals why promising single-crystal cathodes crack, help explain why some early adopters of these materials saw unexpected failures, as detailed in the account of how new research reveals why promising single-crystal cathodes crack.
Fast charging, ion traffic jams and the role of pore networks
On the user side, one of the most visible stressors is fast charging. Pulling 250 kilowatts into a pack means shoving lithium ions through the electrode’s microscopic pores at extreme rates, and if those pathways are not designed correctly, ions pile up and create local hot spots and concentration gradients. That is where work by researchers like Ankur Gupta becomes crucial. In his research, Ankur Gupta explains that a battery’s charging process depends on the movement of ions and particles within a complex microscopic pore structure, and that the geometry of those pores can either smooth out or amplify the stresses of rapid charging, a point highlighted in coverage of his findings on how Ankur Gupta explains the role of pore structure.
Other scientists are attacking the same problem from the materials side, looking for chemistries that can handle high currents without the same degradation. One recent study described how researchers have fixed a major capacity degradation issue in EV batteries and boosted cell lifespan by redesigning the cathode and electrolyte interface, a result that could make ultra-fast charging less punishing. They framed their work as a way to create longer-lasting, safer batteries for electric vehicles by addressing the root causes of capacity fade rather than just managing it with software, a goal laid out in their report on how researchers have boosted batteries’ lifespan. Together, these efforts suggest that the ten-minute charging sessions promised for future EVs will only be sustainable if the internal architecture of the electrodes is carefully tuned to avoid ion traffic jams.
Hydrogen, oxygen and the cathode’s quiet sabotage
Beyond cracking and copper migration, scientists are also uncovering how seemingly minor impurities can sabotage cathode performance. Work from Stanford and collaborators has shown that hydrogen atoms sneaking into the cathode structure can block the pathways that electrons and lithium ions need, especially during charging. In layered nickel-rich materials, the cathode is not only a lithium host but also the conduit for electrons, and if many hydrogen atoms occupy key sites, that electronic conductivity drops. Researchers described this as the culprit behind degradation in certain high-energy cells, noting that the cathode is also the conduit for electrons while charging the battery, but not so much if many hydrogen atoms occupy the structure, a mechanism explained in detail in their discovery that may lead to longer-lasting, longer-range EV batteries.
That hydrogen story dovetails with the broader theme of oxygen loss and lattice instability. When oxygen leaves and transition metals migrate, as the SLAC work showed, the cathode becomes more prone to side reactions with the electrolyte, which can generate gases and further destabilize the structure. Over time, these intertwined processes turn a neatly ordered crystal into a patchwork of disordered regions, blocked channels and inactive debris. The result is a battery that still looks intact from the outside but delivers less energy per charge and is more sensitive to high currents and temperature extremes, a quiet sabotage that only becomes obvious when range estimates start to fall.
From lab breakthroughs to EVs that hold their range
For automakers and drivers, the encouraging news is that these are not just academic curiosities. The same studies that identified cobalt-driven cracking and breathing-induced stress are already pointing to concrete fixes, from cobalt-lean single-crystal recipes to electrode architectures that flex without fracturing. One major breakthrough in battery science explicitly argued that by understanding the opposite material needs for single-crystal batteries compared with polycrystalline ones, engineers can redesign cathodes to extend battery life and safety, and that those failures might be reduced with better control of composition and processing, as outlined in the follow-up analysis of how those failures might be reduced.
On the consumer side, I see the emerging science reinforcing the practical advice already circulating in EV communities. Keeping state of charge between roughly 20 and 80 percent for daily use, avoiding repeated overdischarge that could trigger dissolved copper migration, and using fast charging as an occasional tool rather than a daily habit all help keep mechanical and chemical stresses in check. As researchers continue to refine cathode compositions, pore structures and thermal management, the gap between what the chemistry can deliver and what drivers actually experience should narrow. The goal is clear: EV batteries that do not just start strong on the showroom floor, but keep most of their capacity for the long haul, with microscopic cracks and atomic migrations finally tamed instead of quietly cutting range short.
More from MorningOverview