Neanderthals have long been portrayed as cold-adapted Ice Age specialists, their broad faces and big noses cast as natural radiators that warmed frigid air before it hit the lungs. New work on a uniquely preserved skull is now undercutting that story, suggesting those prominent nasal passages were not finely tuned heaters so much as one more piece of a complex, imperfect anatomy. Instead of a neat adaptation tale, their faces are starting to look like evolutionary compromises shaped by multiple pressures at once.
By peering inside the only intact inner nasal cavity known from a Neanderthal, researchers are finding that the structures that really matter for conditioning air look surprisingly ordinary. The bones that supported the soft tissues of the nose do not match what I would expect from a specialist built to thrive in extreme cold, and that forces a rethink of how these ancient relatives lived, breathed, and survived.
How a single skull opened a hidden Neanderthal cavity
The turning point in this debate comes from a fossil known as Altamura Man, a Neanderthal whose remains were discovered deep in a cave in southern Italy and left largely encased in rock. Unlike most Neanderthal finds, which are crushed, fragmented, or distorted, this skull preserves the inner nasal region in three dimensions, giving researchers an unprecedented look at the bony scaffolding that once supported cartilage, mucous membranes, and turbinates. That intact anatomy is what allows scientists to move beyond educated guesses about airflow and finally test how a Neanderthal nose was actually built.
To reach those hidden bones without destroying the fossil, the team used endoscopic cameras and digital imaging to reconstruct the right nasal hemicavity in detail. The resulting model, which shows the internal space in yellow inside a transparent cranium, reveals how the nasal passages connected to the rest of the face and how much room there was for soft tissue that would have influenced breathing and heat exchange, as described in a digital reconstruction of the Neanderthal from Altamura. That level of preservation is why Altamura Man has become the reference point for any claim about what a Neanderthal nose could or could not do.
The long-standing myth of the “cold-adapted” Neanderthal nose
For decades, paleoanthropologists and textbook writers leaned on a simple logic: Neanderthals lived in Eurasia during glacial periods, they had large nasal openings and midfaces that projected forward, therefore their noses must have evolved to warm and humidify icy air. The idea fit neatly with broader narratives about stocky bodies and short limbs as cold adaptations, and it seemed to explain why their faces looked so different from those of many modern humans. That story was repeated so often that it hardened into orthodoxy, even though it rested mostly on external shape rather than internal anatomy.
Recent analyses are now challenging that assumption by showing that the overall Neanderthal facial pattern does not line up with what is known about respiratory adaptations in other mammals. When researchers compared facial form and airflow models, they concluded that the typical Neanderthal configuration was not primarily driven by the need to condition cold air, but instead reflected a mix of factors that included chewing forces and the demands of supporting a large body, a point underscored in a report that noted how Neanderthal facial shape did not behave like a specialized cold-climate solution. That shift in emphasis sets the stage for why the inner nasal bones of Altamura Man matter so much.
What Altamura Man’s inner nose really looks like
When the team examined the endoscopic images from Altamura Man, they were looking for the bony correlates of a high-performance air warmer: enlarged turbinates, convoluted passageways, or other structures that would maximize contact between inhaled air and moist, warm tissue. Instead, they found that the internal nasal architecture was neither especially expanded nor dramatically reduced compared with that of modern humans. In other words, the part of the nose that actually conditions air looked relatively unremarkable, even though the external opening and midface were strikingly robust.
That mismatch between outer bulk and inner subtlety is what undercuts the classic adaptation story. The researchers concluded that, although Altamura Man had a large nose in profile, his internal nasal structures did not show the kind of extreme specialization expected in an organism that evolved specifically to withstand harsh climates, a finding highlighted when the analysis of the endoscopic images showed that Altamura Man’s inner nasal structures were neither especially large nor especially small compared with those of modern humans. That result suggests that the impressive Neanderthal nose may have been more about overall facial architecture than about a finely tuned breathing system.
From external bulk to internal function
The contrast between the big external nose and the relatively ordinary internal cavity forces a distinction between what looks adapted and what actually functions as an adaptation. External bone can be shaped by many forces, including chewing muscles, tooth position, and the need to distribute mechanical stress across the face. Internal nasal bones, by contrast, are more directly tied to airflow and the conditioning of inhaled air. In Altamura Man, the internal configuration does not show the exaggerated convolutions that would be expected if warming and humidifying cold air were the dominant evolutionary pressure.
That insight dovetails with broader work that has modeled how Neanderthal faces handled air and stress. Studies that simulate airflow and bone strain have found that the Neanderthal midface does not outperform that of modern humans in terms of respiratory efficiency in cold conditions, but it does handle certain biting and chewing loads differently, a pattern consistent with the idea that their faces were shaped by multiple overlapping demands. One analysis framed this explicitly, noting that the results indicated the typical Neanderthal facial shape was not driven by respiratory adaptation to cold but instead reflected a more complex set of influences on how the nasal system looked and functioned, a conclusion captured in the statement that these results indicate the Neanderthal face was not simply a cold-air machine. That reframing moves the conversation away from single-cause explanations and toward a more nuanced view of form and function.
The only intact inner nose and what it can really tell us
Altamura Man is not just another Neanderthal specimen, he is the only individual whose inner nasal bones are preserved well enough to be analyzed in this way. Earlier this year, researchers emphasized that this is the only intact Neanderthal inner nose known to exist, which makes any conclusions drawn from it both powerful and precarious. On one hand, it offers a rare chance to test long-standing assumptions about nasal function; on the other, it is a single data point that may not capture the full range of variation across Neanderthal populations that lived in different environments.
Even with that caveat, the analysis of this unique specimen carries weight because it directly addresses the structures that matter most for conditioning air. The team behind the work described their project as an analysis of the only intact Neanderthal inner nose bones known to exist, and they reported that this enormous nose did not evolve simply to withstand harsh climates, a conclusion summarized in a note that an analysis of the only such specimen showed the nose was not a straightforward cold adaptation. That finding does not rule out any role for climate, but it does argue against the idea that Neanderthals were respiratory specialists optimized for freezing air.
Revisiting Neanderthal life in cold climates
If Neanderthal noses were not finely tuned heaters, then their survival in Ice Age Eurasia must have relied more heavily on other strategies. Archaeological evidence already points to complex behaviors, including the use of fire, clothing, and shelters, that would have buffered them from the worst of the cold. The new anatomical work suggests that their bodies were not doing all the work on their own, and that cultural and technological solutions may have been just as important as any built-in physiological advantage.
That perspective also helps explain why Neanderthals could occupy a range of environments, from relatively temperate regions to more severe glacial landscapes, without showing the kind of extreme nasal specialization seen in some Arctic mammals. Instead of being locked into a single ecological niche, they appear to have been flexible generalists whose facial anatomy was one part of a broader survival toolkit. The idea that Neanderthals were thought to have evolved large noses to warm cold air before it reached their lungs is now being reconsidered in light of evidence that their nasal system did not behave like a dedicated cold-adaptation device, as highlighted in work noting that Neanderthals were thought to have such specialized noses but likely did not. That shift nudges the field toward a more integrated view of biology and behavior.
Why the Neanderthal face still matters for us
Understanding why Neanderthals looked the way they did is not just an exercise in fossil forensics, it also feeds into broader questions about how human faces evolve under different environmental and cultural pressures. Modern humans show wide variation in nasal shape and size, and some of that variation does track climate, but the Neanderthal case is a reminder that external appearance can be a misleading guide to internal function. The Altamura Man findings suggest that even dramatic facial features may arise from a tangle of influences that include diet, body size, and developmental pathways, not just temperature and humidity.
For me, the most striking lesson is methodological rather than cosmetic. By combining endoscopy, digital reconstruction, and comparative anatomy, researchers have been able to test a story that once seemed intuitively obvious and show that it does not hold up under close scrutiny. Earlier work that framed Neanderthal noses as cold-adapted is now being revised in light of new evidence that their hefty noses were not well adapted to cold climates, a point underscored in reporting that described how Nov 16, 2025 findings reshaped that narrative. As more fossils are studied with similar tools, I expect more cherished assumptions about our ancient cousins, and about ourselves, to face the same kind of reality check.
More from MorningOverview