The Montana-class battleships, conceived under the 1940 Two-Ocean Navy Act, were envisioned as the U.S. Navy’s most formidable warships. With a standard displacement of 60,500 tons and twelve 16-inch/50 caliber guns, these “super battleships” were designed to outclass any existing naval power. However, the realities of World War II and the shift towards aircraft carriers led to their cancellation on July 21, 1943, before they could be built. Despite their unrealized potential, a recent analysis argues that the Montana-class still holds valuable lessons for the modern U.S. Navy.
Design Origins and Authorization
The 1940 Two-Ocean Navy Act, a response to escalating global tensions, authorized the construction of the Montana-class battleships. These vessels were intended to succeed the Iowa-class, providing a robust counter to potential threats from Japan and Germany. The U.S. Navy’s Bureau of Construction and Repair began sketching initial designs in 1939, aiming to surpass existing battleships in terms of armor and firepower.
Early feasibility studies projected a beam of 115 feet and a length of 921 feet for the Montana-class. However, these dimensions posed significant engineering challenges, such as the need to navigate the Panama Canal, a critical strategic passage for the U.S. Navy.
Key Specifications and Armament
The Montana-class was designed to carry a main battery of twelve 16-inch/50 caliber Mark 7 guns in four triple turrets. These guns, coupled with advanced fire-control systems, were expected to deliver a range exceeding 20 miles. The armor scheme included a 16.1-inch belt and up to 18-inch turret faces, designed to withstand 18-inch shells from foreign navies.
The propulsion system comprised eight Babcock & Wilcox boilers driving four shafts, enabling a top speed of 28 knots. The crew requirement was estimated at around 2,355 personnel, reflecting the scale and complexity of these warships.
Comparisons to Contemporary Battleships
Compared to the Iowa-class, the Montana-class represented a significant scale increase. The Iowa-class displaced 45,000 tons standard, while the Montana-class was designed to displace 60,500 tons. The Montana-class also boasted twelve guns against the Iowa’s nine, providing a greater broadside weight.
The Montana-class was also designed with enhanced anti-aircraft capabilities. The planned 5-inch/54 caliber dual-purpose guns and 40mm Bofors mounts marked a departure from earlier battleship designs, reflecting the evolving nature of naval warfare.
Factors Leading to Cancellation
The expiration of the Washington Naval Treaty limitations in 1936 initially allowed for larger designs like the Montana-class. However, by 1942, wartime production priorities began to clash with these ambitious plans. The shift in resource allocation towards the construction of Essex-class carriers led to the formal cancellation of the Montana-class on July 21, 1943, before any keels were laid.
The strategic reevaluation of naval power post-Pearl Harbor also played a role in the cancellation. The rise of carrier-based aviation signaled the end of battleship-centric fleets, rendering the Montana-class concept obsolete.
Legacy in Naval Architecture
Despite their cancellation, the Montana-class battleships influenced post-war naval designs. Concepts from the Montana-class were incorporated into theoretical “super carriers” and modern destroyer hull forms. The design’s focus on stability and firepower continues to inform naval architecture.
Blueprints and models of the Montana-class are preserved at institutions like the U.S. Naval Academy, serving as educational tools for naval engineers. The Montana-class also features in cultural depictions, with scale models and simulations demonstrating the ship’s hypothetical performance in fleet actions.
Lessons for the Modern U.S. Navy
A recent analysis published on September 24, 2025, argues that the Montana-class’s emphasis on balanced firepower and protection offers insights for current debates over large-surface combatants like the Zumwalt-class. The Montana-class’s modular armor concepts parallel today’s stealth and modular warship philosophies, highlighting the value of adaptability in naval design.
The Montana-class also underscores the importance of paper studies in anticipating future challenges. As peer competitors like China expand their naval capabilities, lessons from the Montana-class could inform the U.S. Navy’s strategic planning and design philosophy. As the National Security Journal suggests, these “super battleships” that were built only on paper still have a message for the modern U.S. Navy.
More from MorningOverview