The ‘7-Minute Rule’ at Home Depot, a policy that mandated employees to wait exactly seven minutes before clocking in at the start of their shifts, sparked significant controversy across U.S. stores. This internal guideline, which came to light through employee discussions and media reports, underscored the tension between corporate efficiency measures and labor rights. The rule’s continued relevance, as of October 2025, continues to fuel debates on fair compensation in the retail sector.
What Is Home Depot’s ‘7-Minute Rule’?
The ‘7-Minute Rule’ was an unofficial directive that instructed Home Depot associates not to punch in until seven minutes prior to their scheduled shift start. Any earlier arrival was treated as unpaid personal time. This rule applied to tasks such as donning uniforms or gathering tools, which the company interpreted as non-compensable activities under labor guidelines. The operational mechanics of this rule in daily store routines can be found in a detailed SlashGear article.
The Origins and Implementation of the Rule
The ‘7-Minute Rule’ originated from Home Depot’s efforts to align with federal wage laws, such as the Fair Labor Standards Act, by distinguishing between on-duty and off-duty time. The policy was rolled out through internal memos and training sessions starting in the early 2010s. The enforcement of the rule varied by store managers in locations from Atlanta headquarters to nationwide outlets. The October 23, 2025 reporting provides insights into how the rule was communicated to avoid overtime liabilities.
Key Reasons for the Controversy
Employees argued that the seven-minute window ignored the real preparation needs, such as navigating large warehouse layouts or handling safety gear, leading to rushed starts. Similar clock-in restrictions in the broader retail industry have drawn scrutiny for potentially violating minimum wage protections. The SlashGear article discusses how the rule symbolized cost-cutting at the expense of worker morale.
Employee Reactions and Real-World Impacts
Frontline workers lodged complaints, including reports of lost wages equivalent to 10-15 minutes per shift across thousands of U.S. stores. The policy triggered social media outcry and union organizing efforts in high-traffic locations like California and Texas depots. Personal anecdotes from associates facing disciplinary action for early clock-ins were highlighted in the 2025 coverage.
Home Depot’s Official Stance and Responses
Home Depot defended the rule, stating that it complied with Department of Labor guidelines on compensable time and was a tool for accurate payroll. The company responded to the backlash by issuing clarifications via HR channels and making adjustments in select regions following complaints. Executive statements addressing the uproar can be found in the explained policy details from October 23, 2025.
Legal Challenges and Broader Implications
Class-action lawsuits against Home Depot raised potential FLSA violations, focusing on unpaid donning and doffing time. The rule had ripple effects on retail labor standards, influencing policies at competitors like Lowe’s amid rising minimum wage debates. The recent SlashGear analysis provides insights into regulatory investigations as of 2025.
Current Status of the ‘7-Minute Rule’ in 2025
As of 2025, reports indicate that the policy persists informally in some stores despite official softening. Post-2025 updates include policy revisions in response to ongoing employee feedback and labor market shifts. The October 23, 2025, reporting confirms the debated existence of the ‘7-Minute Rule’ today.
More from MorningOverview