A recent forensic study has shed new light on the final hours of Jesus Christ, as depicted by the bloodstains on the Shroud of Turin. The study, conducted by Italian researchers, suggests that the patterns of blood on the shroud are consistent with severe torture, including scourging and crucifixion. While some see this as further evidence of the shroud’s authenticity, others point to recent analyses that challenge its origins.
The Shroud of Turin’s Bloodstain Patterns
The bloodstains on the Shroud of Turin have long been a subject of fascination and scrutiny. Forensic experts have now analyzed these stains and found that their direction and pattern are consistent with a body positioned on a cross during crucifixion. This includes rivulets of blood that appear to have flowed from wounds on the wrists and feet.
Over 370 bloodstains were examined using microscopy and spectrometry. These stains showed serum halos around hemoglobin, suggesting that the blood was fresh from trauma rather than from post-mortem decomposition. This pattern of blood flow aligns with the biblical account of Jesus’ torture, including multiple falls while carrying a crossbeam, as detailed in the recent forensic analysis.
Forensic Insights into the Scourging
The bloodstains on the shroud also provide insights into the brutal scourging that Jesus is said to have endured before his crucifixion. The patterns of these stains suggest over 120 strikes with a Roman flagrum, a type of whip, causing lacerations across the back, shoulders, and legs. This matches historical descriptions of Roman scourging.
The positioning of these stains implies that the victim was bent forward during the beating, with blood dripping in parabolic arcs due to motion. These findings, as detailed in the study revealing Jesus’ final hours, emphasize the horrific extent of the abuse Jesus suffered before his crucifixion.
Crucifixion Wounds and Post-Mortem Evidence
The nail wound stains on the wrists and feet of the figure on the shroud provide further evidence of crucifixion. The blood flows from these wounds indicate that the arms were stretched upward and the body slumped forward, a position consistent with the asphyxiation risks associated with crucifixion.
There are also patterns of blood and a clear fluid from a side wound, suggestive of a spear thrust. This fluid is indicative of pericardial effusion, a condition that aligns with the biblical account in John 19:34. The absence of distortions in the stains caused by rigor mortis suggests that the body was wrapped in the shroud within two to three hours after death, as detailed in the bloodstains study.
Claims About Jesus’ Blood Type
Researcher Giulio Fanti has claimed that forensic tests have identified the blood on the shroud as type AB. This is based on antigen reactions in samples taken from the shroud’s stains. This rare blood type matches traces found on the Sudarium of Oviedo, another relic purportedly from Jesus’ burial, suggesting a potential link between the two.
The claim about the blood type, made in August 2025, has implications for the authenticity of the shroud. It fuels debates about whether the shroud could indeed be the burial cloth described in the Gospels, as reported by the Mirror.
Skeptical Views from Medieval Sources
Despite these findings, skepticism about the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin persists. A 14th-century text from Lirey, France, recently discovered, explicitly declares the shroud a “clear fake”. The text, written by local bishop Pierre d’Arcis, accuses the creators of the shroud of painting an image to deceive pilgrims. It references an earlier investigation that exposed the forgery.
The publication of this text in September 2025 has renewed doubts about the relic’s first documented appearance in the 1350s. The text and its claims are detailed in a report by SciTechDaily.
Alternative Theories on the Shroud’s Image Formation
Alternative theories about the formation of the image on the Shroud of Turin have also been proposed. A 3D analysis conducted in August 2025 using volumetric scanning suggests that the faint body outline on the shroud resulted from contact with a heated bas-relief sculpture, rather than radiation or a real corpse. This theory is detailed in a report by Archaeology Magazine.
The superficiality of the image, which penetrates only the top 200 nanometers of the linen fibers, aligns with artistic techniques using acid or pigment on a mannequin-like model. While this suggests that the image may be artificial, the forensic details of the wounds could still reflect real crucifixion practices.
More from MorningOverview