Physicists have long treated space and time as the stage on which quantum particles perform, not as actors in the drama themselves. A new theoretical framework now flips that script, treating space and time as quantum objects that can be described and manipulated within a single system. If it holds up, this shift could reshape how I think about gravity, quantum networks, and even the basic notion of cause and effect.
Instead of assuming a fixed background where events unfold, the emerging picture suggests that the geometry of the universe might be encoded in quantum states and operations. That idea is starting to connect abstract work on quantum gravity with concrete proposals for quantum networks and precision clocks, hinting at a future where spacetime is something we can probe, entangle, and perhaps even engineer.
A South Korean proposal that puts spacetime inside quantum theory
The most striking recent move in this direction comes from a South Korean physicist who has put forward a framework that treats space and time as parts of a unified quantum system. Rather than assuming that particles live in a preexisting arena, this approach describes the arena itself using quantum states and operators, so that geometry and matter are handled within the same mathematical language. The key claim is that what we usually call spacetime can be reconstructed from correlations inside a deeper quantum structure, instead of being a separate ingredient added by hand.
In reporting on this work, the researcher is described simply as a South Korean physicist who challenges the traditional view that time and space are separate. The proposal does not just tweak existing equations, it argues that the familiar split between spatial coordinates and temporal evolution is an approximation that emerges from a more symmetric quantum description. By embedding both space and time into a single formalism, the theory aims to close a conceptual gap that has dogged attempts to reconcile quantum mechanics with relativity.
Lee’s space-time quantum theory and the end of “states at an instant”
At the Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, physicist Lee has pushed this idea further by explicitly rejecting the habit of treating quantum states as if they only existed at a single moment. In the standard textbook picture, I specify a wavefunction at one time and then evolve it forward, which quietly assumes that time is a classical parameter sitting outside the quantum system. Lee’s framework instead treats histories in space and time as the fundamental objects, so that what I call a “state” already encodes how a system stretches across both dimensions.
According to coverage of this work, Lee joined the faculty at the Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology only two years before releasing a paper that lays out a new space-time quantum theory. Until now, quantum states have largely been treated as snapshots defined at a particular time, then pushed along by an external clock. Lee argues that this is a convenience, not a necessity, and that a more faithful description uses a single mathematical language to encode both spatial configuration and temporal ordering. In that view, the distinction between “before” and “after” is not imposed from outside but arises from the structure of the quantum description itself.
Why unifying space and time inside quantum mechanics matters
Bringing space and time into the quantum fold is not just a philosophical clean up, it addresses a concrete mismatch between our two best physical theories. Quantum mechanics excels at describing particles and fields at small scales, while general relativity treats gravity as the curvature of spacetime, yet the two frameworks talk past each other about what time and geometry actually are. When I try to apply both at once, for instance near a black hole or in the early universe, the usual assumption of a fixed background time parameter breaks down, and the equations start to clash.
A unified quantum description of spacetime promises a way out of that impasse by treating geometry as another quantum variable that can fluctuate, entangle, and superpose. In such a picture, the gravitational field is no longer a smooth fabric that everything else sits on, it is part of the same probabilistic machinery that governs electrons and photons. The South Korean proposal and Lee’s work both move in this direction, suggesting that what we experience as a continuous flow of time and a three dimensional space could be emergent features of a deeper quantum structure that does not privilege any particular slicing into “now” and “later.”
Quantum gravity and the search for a Theory of Everything
The drive to quantize spacetime is closely tied to the broader hunt for a quantum theory of gravity, often framed as a step toward a Theory of Everything. In that context, gravity is not just another force to be added to the quantum menu, it is the manifestation of how spacetime itself responds to energy and momentum. A consistent quantum description of that response would let me calculate what happens when gravitational fields are strong and quantum effects are unavoidable, such as in the first fractions of a second after the Big Bang or at the center of a black hole.
One recent line of work, highlighted in coverage of a new theory of gravity, argues that a quantum theory of gravity would clear the path to answering some of the biggest questions in physics and could provide a bridge to Einstein’s theory of gravity. The reporting notes that a quantum theory of gravity would not simply reproduce general relativity, it would extend it, offering a more complete description that remains valid at all scales. The emerging spacetime quantum frameworks fit naturally into that ambition, because they treat the geometry that general relativity describes as a derived quantity, not a starting assumption.
Entangled clocks and the quantum internet as spacetime laboratories
While much of the work on quantum spacetime is highly abstract, there are already concrete proposals for testing how quantum theory behaves in curved spacetime using networks of entangled clocks. In one such idea, a quantum internet links distant atomic clocks so that their ticks are correlated in a way that cannot be explained classically. By comparing how those entangled clocks run in different gravitational environments, researchers can probe whether the usual rules of quantum mechanics still hold when time itself is warped by gravity.
Reporting on this concept describes a quantum network of distant clocks that could be built on top of a future quantum internet, with entangled timekeepers acting as both communication nodes and precision sensors. The work, highlighted in a piece titled “Quantum Internet Meets Space-Time in This New Ingenious Idea,” notes that the entangled clocks can test how quantum theory behaves in the presence of gravity and that such a network could be more versatile than previously thought. The proposal, which was discussed in Jul, treats the quantum internet not just as an information technology but as a tool for fundamental physics, turning a web of entangled devices into a laboratory for spacetime itself. The idea is captured in coverage of how a quantum network of distant clocks could explore the interface between quantum theory and gravity.
From background stage to quantum player: rethinking causality
Once I stop treating spacetime as a fixed background, familiar notions of cause and effect start to look less rigid. In standard physics, causes precede effects along well defined trajectories in a preexisting spacetime, and the order of events is the same for all observers who agree on what happened. In a quantum spacetime framework, however, the ordering of events can itself become a quantum variable, so that different processes might not share a single, globally agreed timeline. That does not mean anything goes, but it does mean that causal structure could be context dependent and encoded in correlations rather than in a universal clock.
Lee’s insistence on describing space and time within a single mathematical language, and the South Korean proposal that treats them as unified quantum entities, both point toward this more flexible view of causality. If what I call “before” and “after” are emergent features of a quantum description, then there may be regimes where the usual arrow of time is blurred or where operations do not have a fixed order. Experiments with entangled clocks on a quantum network, like those envisioned in the Jul proposal, would be natural places to look for such effects, since they combine quantum correlations with precise control over timing and location.
Potential technological payoffs, from navigation to sensing
Although the immediate motivation for a quantum spacetime framework is theoretical, the practical implications are hard to ignore. If I can describe space and time as quantum resources, then I can, in principle, engineer devices that exploit those resources more efficiently. For example, a network of entangled clocks that is sensitive to tiny variations in gravitational potential could dramatically improve navigation and geodesy, allowing aircraft, ships, and even autonomous vehicles to localize themselves using subtle shifts in time rather than relying solely on classical GPS signals.
Similarly, quantum sensors that treat spacetime curvature as a measurable quantum field could detect gravitational waves, underground structures, or changes in mass distribution with unprecedented precision. The same ideas that drive the search for a quantum theory of gravity, as described in the work on a new theory of gravity that aims to connect quantum mechanics to Einstein’s theory, could feed into technologies that monitor Earth’s crust, guide deep space missions, or synchronize financial networks. In that sense, the unification of space and time within quantum mechanics is not just a conceptual clean up, it is a potential engine for new generations of measurement and communication tools.
The road ahead: testing and refining a quantum spacetime
For all their promise, the new frameworks that treat spacetime as a quantum system remain hypotheses that must survive both mathematical scrutiny and experimental tests. The South Korean physicist’s proposal and Lee’s space-time quantum theory offer elegant ways to encode space and time in a single formalism, but they will need to reproduce the successes of existing theories in familiar regimes while also making new, testable predictions. That is a high bar, since general relativity and quantum mechanics have both passed every experimental challenge in their respective domains.
The most promising path forward is likely to be a feedback loop between theory and experiment, where ideas about quantum spacetime guide the design of quantum networks, entangled clocks, and precision sensors, and the data from those systems in turn constrain the theories. Work on a quantum theory of gravity that could bridge to Einstein’s description of gravity, as well as proposals for quantum internet based spacetime tests, show that this loop is already forming. As I watch that process unfold, the striking thing is how quickly the conversation has shifted from treating spacetime as an untouchable backdrop to treating it as something that can be quantified, entangled, and perhaps eventually controlled within a single quantum framework.
More from Morning Overview