Ford is drawing a clear line in the dashboard wars, publicly committing to keep Apple CarPlay in its vehicles even as some rivals try to lock drivers into proprietary software. The company is framing the decision as a response to what its customers actually want, not just a technical or financial calculation. That stance puts Ford at the center of a broader fight over who controls the in‑car experience, the automaker or the tech giant in your pocket.
Ford’s public promise: CarPlay is not going away
Ford has been unusually explicit that it will not follow competitors that are stripping out Apple’s phone mirroring from new models. Executives have cast the decision as a matter of respecting driver preferences, saying that people who buy a Ford expect to plug in an iPhone and see familiar apps, maps, and messages on the center screen. By tying its position to customer demand rather than a temporary marketing pitch, Ford is signaling that CarPlay support is part of its long‑term product strategy, not a feature that could quietly disappear in the next software update.
That message was sharpened when the company contrasted its approach with General Motors, which has announced plans to remove CarPlay from future electric vehicles in favor of its own software. Ford has effectively promised not to repeat that move, with one executive stressing that the company is committed to giving drivers a real choice in how they connect their phones. The commitment to keep Apple CarPlay in the lineup is being framed internally as a competitive advantage at a time when some buyers are already wary of losing features they consider basic.
Customer demand and the survey data behind Ford’s bet
Ford’s insistence that it is simply listening to customers is not just marketing language, it is backed by research that shows how deeply drivers have integrated smartphone mirroring into daily life. In surveys, more than half of respondents say that systems like CarPlay are not a nice‑to‑have but a core requirement when they shop for a new vehicle. For many buyers, the ability to bring in Apple Maps, Spotify, or WhatsApp through a familiar interface matters more than any single native navigation or media app an automaker can build on its own.
That preference has real consequences for brands that try to walk away from Apple. When General Motors announced that its future electric models would not support CarPlay, it triggered a backlash among tech‑savvy shoppers who saw the move as a step backward. Ford has been explicit that it does not want to repeat what some analysts already describe as GM’s “CarPlay mistake,” pointing to survey findings that over half of drivers view smartphone mirroring as essential and using that data to justify its decision to keep Apple integration in place.
Inside Ford’s boardroom: Farley’s cautious view of CarPlay Ultra
Ford’s commitment to CarPlay does not mean its leadership is uncritical of Apple’s latest ambitions. Chief executive Jim Farley has been unusually candid about his mixed feelings toward Apple’s new CarPlay Ultra platform, which aims to extend the iPhone’s reach from the center screen to the instrument cluster and climate controls. He has questioned whether it is wise to let an outside brand sit between Ford and its customers at the most fundamental level, including the moment when a driver starts the car or adjusts safety‑critical settings.
In public comments, Farley has said that Ford is considering Apple’s all‑in‑one software solution but that he did not like “the execution in round one,” a blunt assessment that underlines how carefully the company is weighing the trade‑offs. He has also raised questions about security and branding, asking whether drivers really want the Apple logo to dominate the startup sequence in a Ford. That cautious tone has been evident in his remarks about Ford CEO Jim Farley and his view of Ultra, and in separate interviews where he has reiterated that Ford is “very committed to Apple” while still reserving the right to shape how deeply Ultra reaches into the vehicle’s core systems.
Why Ford still criticizes Ultra while embracing Apple
From my perspective, Ford’s stance on CarPlay Ultra is less a contradiction and more a negotiation in public. The company wants to keep the features that customers love, such as seamless access to Apple Music and turn‑by‑turn directions, while drawing a line at letting Apple dictate the entire look and feel of the cockpit. That is why Farley can say he is committed to Apple and, in the same breath, argue that the first version of Ultra does not yet meet Ford’s expectations for design, safety, or brand presence.
In one interview, Farley made it clear that Ford is actively evaluating Apple’s all‑in‑one approach but that the company will only adopt it if it makes sense from a security standpoint and preserves Ford’s ability to differentiate its vehicles. He has been quoted saying that he does not like “the execution in round one,” a phrase that captures both his skepticism and his willingness to keep talking. Those comments about Jim Farley and Ultra show a leader trying to balance customer expectations with the need to keep Ford’s own software roadmap alive.
Sherry House and the financial logic of keeping CarPlay
The commitment to CarPlay is not just a product decision, it is also a financial calculation that Ford’s leadership has started to spell out. At the 2025 Barclays Global Auto and Mobility Tech Conference, Ford chief financial officer Sherry House underscored that the company sees continued support for Apple’s platform as aligned with its broader strategy for profitable growth. By her account, walking away from CarPlay would risk alienating loyal customers and complicating the sales pitch for high‑margin vehicles that depend on a premium tech experience.
House’s comments suggest that Ford believes it can still build a viable business around connected services even if Apple controls a large slice of the screen. Rather than trying to charge drivers for basic navigation or media features that CarPlay already delivers, Ford is focusing on areas where it can add unique value, such as vehicle health monitoring, energy management for electric models, and subscription‑based driver assistance. In that context, her insistence at the Barclays Global Auto and Mobility Tech Conference that Ford CFO Sherry House will continue to back CarPlay reads as a signal that the company sees more upside in keeping customers happy than in trying to wall them off from their phones.
How Ford is positioning itself against General Motors, Tesla and Rivian
Ford’s decision looks even more strategic when set against the broader competitive landscape. As of the middle of this decade, General Motors has announced plans to eliminate CarPlay from its electric vehicles, while Tesla and Rivian have never offered CarPlay support at all, preferring to rely entirely on their own proprietary systems. That leaves Ford in a relatively rare position among major American automakers, using Apple’s software as a selling point rather than a threat.
By promising to keep CarPlay, Ford is effectively telling buyers who are frustrated with GM’s direction or wary of Tesla’s closed ecosystem that they have another option. The company can now market its vehicles as combining the best of both worlds, native Ford features and full iPhone integration, at a time when some rivals are asking customers to relearn basic tasks like navigation and messaging inside unfamiliar interfaces. The contrast is especially stark when you consider that General Motors, Tesla and Rivian are all betting that they can win drivers over to their own software, while Ford is betting that meeting customers where they already are will pay off.
The long road to CarPlay dominance in the dashboard
To understand why Ford is so reluctant to walk away from CarPlay, it helps to look at how deeply Apple has embedded itself in the car over the past decade. Since its introduction, CarPlay has steadily expanded from a niche feature in a handful of models to a near default expectation in mainstream vehicles. For many drivers, the first thing they do in a new car is plug in an iPhone and bring up Apple Maps or a favorite podcast app, and that behavior has reshaped how automakers think about infotainment.
Over time, CarPlay has evolved from a simple projection of a few apps to a sophisticated interface that can handle navigation, communication, and media with minimal distraction. That evolution has trained drivers to expect a consistent experience across brands, whether they are in a compact hatchback or a full‑size SUV. Ford’s current stance acknowledges that reality: once customers have built their routines around Apple’s ecosystem, ripping it out is not just a technical change, it is a disruption of daily life that risks sending them to a competitor that still offers the integration they rely on.
Balancing control, safety and brand identity in a CarPlay world
From my vantage point, the real tension for Ford is not whether to support CarPlay at all, but how far to let it reach into the vehicle’s core functions. Basic mirroring of apps on the center screen is now table stakes, and Ford has accepted that. The debate is about the next phase, where platforms like Ultra want to manage instrument clusters, climate controls, and even the startup animation, areas that touch safety, regulatory compliance, and brand identity in ways that simple media playback never did.
Ford’s leaders are trying to draw a line that keeps customers happy without ceding too much control to Apple. That is why Farley can praise the convenience of CarPlay while questioning whether drivers really want the Apple brand to start the car, and why Sherry House can argue that keeping CarPlay is good business while still investing heavily in Ford’s own software stack. The company’s refusal to “kill” CarPlay is less a surrender to Big Tech than a recognition that, for now, the iPhone is the center of many drivers’ digital lives, and any automaker that ignores that reality does so at its own risk.
What Ford’s decision means for the next generation of cars
Looking ahead, Ford’s stance on CarPlay will shape how its next generation of vehicles feels to live with. Buyers of upcoming electric crossovers and trucks can expect to see the familiar Apple interface alongside Ford’s own menus, rather than being forced into a single, closed system. That continuity matters for everything from resale value to daily usability, since a car that works seamlessly with an iPhone today is more likely to feel modern a few years down the road.
At the same time, Ford’s cautious approach to Ultra suggests that the company will move incrementally rather than handing over the entire dashboard in one leap. I expect to see Ford experiment with deeper CarPlay integration in specific models or trims while keeping tighter control in others, using customer feedback and usage data to decide where to draw the line. In that sense, the company’s refusal to abandon CarPlay is not the end of the story but the starting point for a longer negotiation over who owns the digital experience in the car, and how much say drivers themselves will ultimately have.
Why Ford’s CarPlay bet is a test for the whole industry
Ford’s decision to keep CarPlay, even as it publicly critiques parts of Apple’s roadmap, is a test case for the rest of the auto industry. If the company can maintain strong customer satisfaction, grow its connected services business, and still differentiate its vehicles in a world where the same Apple interface appears across brands, it will prove that automakers do not have to choose between control and convenience. If, on the other hand, Ford finds that Apple’s presence crowds out its own software ambitions, rivals may feel vindicated in their push toward proprietary systems.
For now, the early signs suggest that Ford’s bet aligns with what drivers actually want. Surveys show that more than half of them see CarPlay as essential, and Ford’s executives, from Jim Farley to Sherry House, are framing their strategy around that reality. The company is refusing to kill CarPlay not out of deference to Apple, but because its own research and sales experience tell it that customers demand it, and in a competitive market, ignoring that demand is a luxury no automaker can afford.
More from MorningOverview