When 67 electric cars were lined up in Inner Mongolia and sent out into temperatures around minus 25 °C, the test cut through marketing claims and exposed how much range drivers really keep in brutal cold. The headline numbers were eye catching, but the more interesting story sat in the middle of the pack, where several Teslas quietly showed how software, efficiency and battery management translate into real winter miles. I want to unpack where those Teslas landed, how the wider field performed, and what this kind of sub-zero trial actually tells anyone shopping for an EV.
The Inner Mongolia deep-freeze and why it matters
China turned a remote stretch of Inner Mongolia into a proving ground, sending 67 plug-in models through what was described as the largest EV winter test that outlet had ever undertaken. I see that scale as important, because it moves the conversation beyond one or two halo cars and into a more realistic cross section of what people actually buy, from compact hatchbacks to big SUVs and extended-range sedans. With temperatures plunging to around minus 25 °C, the test forced every battery pack, heat pump and software algorithm to work at the edge of its comfort zone, which is exactly where range anxiety tends to spike for real-world drivers.
Organizers were not just chasing a single distance figure, they were trying to identify a genuine winter “range king” while also tracking energy consumption and charging behavior across the fleet. In that context, the Teslas were only part of a much broader story that included Chinese brands, plug-in hybrids and extended-range EVs, all running the same punishing loop. By putting dozens of cars through identical conditions in China, the program created a rare apples-to-apples snapshot of how modern electric drivetrains cope when the thermometer falls off a cliff.
How the 67-car winter trial was structured
To make sense of the rankings, it helps to understand how the test differed from the typical highway range runs many EV fans know. Instead of a steady cruise at 60 or 70 miles per hour, the Inner Mongolia program mixed urban-style driving, steady-state stretches and repeated cold starts, which are exactly the scenarios that punish batteries and cabin heaters. One report even noted that this format was “different from the 60, 70 miles per hour highway range test we are used to seeing,” a reminder that the numbers here speak more to harsh winter commuting than to ideal summer road trips, as highlighted in the broader overview of 67 cars tested in sub-zero conditions.
The structure also included multiple “extreme scenarios,” from fast charging in the cold to low-speed operation on icy surfaces, which exposed how thermal management systems juggle battery protection with driver comfort. According to the detailed breakdown of China’s massive EV winter test, organizers even timed how long different models took to fast charge at minus 25 °C, a metric that matters just as much as raw range when you are trying to get home from a ski trip. I read that combination of distance, efficiency and charging performance as a deliberate attempt to mirror the messy reality of winter driving rather than a lab-style certification run.
Where the Teslas actually ranked
For Tesla owners, the obvious question is how their cars stacked up once the snow settled. The most detailed leaderboard information points to the long wheelbase Tesla Model Y L and the regular Tesla Model Y landing in the middle third of the pack, at 29th and 31st respectively. That means they did not top the charts, but they also did not collapse in the cold, instead retaining a solid share of their rated range and confirming why the Tesla Model lineup is still regarded as one of the more efficient EV families on sale.
Those positions matter because they show Tesla no longer operates in a vacuum, especially in China, where domestic brands have caught up quickly on both battery tech and software. Sitting around 30th out of 67 suggests the Model Y variants were competitive but not dominant, which fits with the idea that winter range is now a crowded battleground rather than a one-brand showcase. I read that as a sign that Tesla’s efficiency advantage is being challenged, even if its cars remain among the more sophisticated EVs in the group when it comes to thermal management and energy use.
China’s new winter “range kings” and the rise of EREVs
One of the most striking outcomes of the Inner Mongolia program was how strongly some Chinese extended-range EVs and plug-in hybrids performed. A separate report on the world’s longest-range EREV sedan described a model capable of a 267-mile electric drive before its combustion engine ever needs to help, underscoring how far this technology has come. That same analysis noted that EVs face winter with very different strategies, with some cars like the BYD Seagull leading energy consumption rankings even when the mercury plunges.
In the Inner Mongolia test, the remaining cars that were not pure battery EVs were plug-in hybrids, which could lean on their engines once the battery was depleted but still had to prove their electric-only range in the cold. The detailed account of China’s massive EV winter test makes clear that these PHEVs were evaluated alongside full EVs, which helps explain why some of the top spots went to models that blend battery efficiency with the safety net of a fuel tank. From my perspective, that mix complicates any simple “EV versus Tesla” narrative, because it shows how Chinese manufacturers are using hybrid architectures to sidestep some of the harshest winter penalties.
Fast charging, cold batteries and why 35 minutes matters
Range is only half the story in deep winter, because a car that can go far but takes forever to recharge is still a headache on a long trip. The Inner Mongolia program paid close attention to fast charging in extreme cold, timing how long different models needed to add meaningful energy at minus 25 °C. In one of the more telling data points, a car that struggled with thermal management ranked 44th in the fast-charging category, needing 35 minutes to complete its session, according to the breakdown of fast charging in extreme cold.
Tesla’s reputation for strong Supercharger performance rests heavily on its ability to precondition the battery and hold high charge rates, but even its packs are subject to the laws of physics when the electrolyte is chilled. The Inner Mongolia results suggest that while some Teslas remained relatively quick to charge, they no longer enjoy a clear, across-the-board advantage over the latest Chinese competitors that have optimized their own thermal systems. I see that as a reminder that winter charging performance is now a key differentiator, and that buyers should weigh how a car behaves at a frozen DC fast charger just as carefully as they study its official range label.
How the Chinese results compare with European winter tests
To understand whether the Inner Mongolia findings are an outlier or part of a pattern, it helps to look at how Teslas have fared in other cold-climate trials. In Norway, where winter EV testing has become almost a national sport, the refreshed Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD has already shown that it can outperform rivals in frigid conditions. One widely shared account from Norway described how the updated Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD “destroyed the competition” in a winter range test, maintaining usable range even as the thermometer plunged and other cars reached zero during the test.
More structured European testing has painted a similar picture, albeit with more nuance. The Norwegian Automobile Club, known as NAF, runs an annual cold-weather program in which the Tesla Model 3 has consistently performed well, even when its real-world distance falls short of its official rating. A recent summary of how the Tesla Model 3 “Convinces in winter range test despite deviation” noted that Every year, the Norwegian Automobile Club, NAF, sees some cars lose a large share of their WLTP range, yet the Tesla still ranks near the top even with a high WLTP deviation of 24 %. When I line those European results up against the Chinese rankings, I see a consistent theme: Tesla tends to hold up well in the cold, but local competition and test formats can shuffle its exact position on the leaderboard.
Polestar, other rivals and the broader Winter Test context
Teslas did not run in a vacuum in Inner Mongolia, and they do not in Europe either. One of the clearest examples of that shifting competitive landscape comes from a separate Winter Test that highlighted how a Polestar SUV handled the cold. In a detailed recap of the Winter Test, the Key Results section singled out the Polestar 3 Long Range Dual Motor as a standout performer, noting how that Long Range Dual Motor configuration preserved a large share of its rated distance even when temperatures dropped.
Norwegian testing has echoed that story, with the Polestar 3 often trading blows with Tesla in the same cold-weather trials. The summary that described how the Polestar 3 performed in the NAF program noted that this year, the Polestar 3 was among the cars with a high WLTP deviation of 24 %, yet still delivered a competitive real-world distance. When I put that alongside the Inner Mongolia rankings, it reinforces the idea that Tesla now faces serious winter-capable rivals from both European and Chinese brands, and that buyers should compare specific models rather than assuming any one badge will always win in the cold.
Autohome, Li Xiang and the politics of a giant EV test
Behind the scenes, the Inner Mongolia program was not just a technical exercise, it was also a statement about China’s EV ambitions. The test was organized by Autohome, whose founder Li Xiang is also the CEO and founder of a major Chinese EV brand, which gives the whole effort a distinct industry flavor. The detailed report on Autohome and its role in the test makes clear that this was a carefully staged showcase of domestic technology as much as a neutral scientific trial.
That context matters when interpreting where Teslas landed, because it underscores how the company is now competing on a home field that is increasingly controlled by Chinese players. When a Record-shattering EV test is conducted in China with dozens of local models and only a handful of foreign entrants, the rankings double as a scoreboard for national industrial policy. I see Tesla’s mid-pack Model Y results not as a failure, but as a sign that the company is now one strong player among many in a market that has rapidly matured, especially when it comes to winter-ready EVs.
What sub-zero rankings really mean for everyday drivers
For someone simply trying to decide whether a Tesla will get them to work and back in January, the Inner Mongolia data can feel abstract. The key takeaway I draw is that Teslas, particularly the Tesla Model Y variants and the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD, tend to retain a respectable share of their rated range in deep cold, but they are no longer guaranteed to top every chart. In some tests, like the Norwegian programs where the Tesla Model 3 “Convinces in winter range test despite deviation,” they still sit near the front of the pack, while in others, such as the 67-car Inner Mongolia trial, they settle into the upper middle.
That variability is not a sign that the cars are inconsistent, it is a reflection of how different test formats, speeds and temperature profiles reward different engineering choices. A program that mimics stop-and-go commuting will punish heavy SUVs more than a steady 60 or 70 miles per hour highway run, and a test that starts with preconditioned batteries will flatter cars with strong software integration. When I look across the Chinese and European data, my conclusion is simple: if you live in a cold climate, a Tesla remains a solid, efficient choice, but it is now one of several winter-capable options rather than the only obvious answer. The Inner Mongolia rankings, framed against Norway’s NAF results and the Polestar 3’s Winter Test performance, show that the EV market has reached a point where sub-zero range is a competitive, crowded field, and that is good news for anyone who has to drive through real winters.
More from MorningOverview