For decades, oceanographers have known that something did not add up in the deep sea. Huge predators like sharks and tunas were spending long stretches in the dim “twilight zone,” yet the known prey there could not fully explain how so much top‑end biomass was being fed. Recent work in the mesopelagic and in the Arctic has finally filled in crucial gaps, revealing hidden players that connect food webs, carbon cycles, and even the origins of complex life.
Those discoveries, from mid‑sized fish that shuttle energy up and down the water column to elusive microbes that lock away carbon and strange cells that resemble early complex organisms, amount to a long‑sought missing link in how the deep ocean really works. I see them as pieces of a single story: the deep sea is not a passive abyss but a finely tuned engine that shapes climate and evolution at the surface.
The twilight zone puzzle that would not go away
Marine ecologists have long treated the mesopelagic, the band between roughly 200 and 1,000 meters, as a kind of buffet for big predators. Sharks, tunas, swordfish, and marine mammals routinely dive into this twilight zone, lingering there even though sunlight is faint and temperatures are low. Yet when researchers tried to tally up the known prey, from lanternfish to squids and crustaceans, the numbers did not fully match the energy demands of these large hunters, leaving a persistent gap in the budget of who eats what at depth.
That mismatch was not just an accounting curiosity. If the twilight zone could not support the predators we see, then either the predators were feeding elsewhere or there were major components of the food web that had escaped detection. Recent work led by Dec and other scientists has now shown that the second explanation is closer to the truth, identifying a previously underappreciated group of mid‑sized fish that spend their days deep and their nights near the surface, effectively stitching together the upper ocean and the mesopelagic in a way that had been underestimated for years.
Mid‑sized fish as the deep ocean’s missing link
The new research points to mid‑sized species such as the bigscale pomfret as the crucial intermediaries that solve the twilight zone riddle. These fish live deep during the day, where they are hard to see and even harder to sample, then rise toward the surface at night to feed, before returning to depth with stomachs full. By moving energy and nutrients downwards in this daily commute, they provide a steady, previously hidden food source for the large predators that patrol the mesopelagic, which explains why those predators spend so much time in the dim water rather than staying near the surface where prey is easier to observe.
Dec and colleagues describe how these mid‑sized commuters had been largely skipped over in earlier surveys, which focused either on tiny plankton or on the big charismatic hunters. One of the researchers put it bluntly, noting that “we always talk about the mesopelagic layer like it is this giant buffet for big predators, but we have been skipping over the dishes in the middle and then wondering why the meal looked incomplete.” By directly tracking and sampling these fish, the team showed that the answer to the long‑standing question of why big predators linger in the twilight zone lies with mid‑sized fish that had simply been too elusive for traditional methods.
Following the daily commute into the dark
To understand how these mid‑sized fish could have been overlooked for so long, it helps to look at how the deep ocean is usually studied. Nets and trawls tend to miss agile swimmers that can dart away from approaching gear, and acoustic surveys can struggle to distinguish mid‑sized fish from the dense layers of smaller organisms that also migrate up and down each day. As a result, the very animals that might be doing the most to connect surface and depth were hiding in plain sight, their movements blurred into the background of the so‑called deep scattering layer that shows up on sonar.
Dec and the research team tackled this by combining more sensitive acoustic tools with targeted sampling, allowing them to isolate the signals of fish like the bigscale pomfret and then capture enough individuals to study their diets and behavior in detail. In a separate analysis of the same work, they emphasized how often scientists had talked about the mesopelagic as a buffet without asking who was actually carrying the food from one course to the next, a gap that led one of them to ask, “What is this?” when they first saw the distinct acoustic traces of the mid‑sized commuters. That moment of recognition, documented in a follow‑up discussion of the project, underscored how a fresh look at familiar data can reveal a missing layer in a system scientists thought they already understood.
From buffet lines to full food webs
Once these mid‑sized fish are added back into the picture, the deep ocean’s food web looks far more coherent. Instead of imagining a direct jump from tiny plankton to massive sharks, I can now trace a chain that runs from microscopic producers to small zooplankton, then to mid‑sized commuters like the bigscale pomfret, and finally to the apex predators that shadow them in the twilight zone. This stepped structure helps explain not only where the energy comes from but also why predators choose particular depths and times of day for their foraging dives.
That more complete web has implications beyond ecology. The daily vertical migrations of these fish move carbon‑rich material from the surface into deeper water, where it can be respired, excreted, or eventually buried. By quantifying how much biomass the commuters carry and how often they travel, researchers can refine estimates of how much carbon the ocean can sequester through biological processes. The discovery that the answer to the predator puzzle lies with mid‑sized commuters therefore feeds directly into climate models that depend on accurate representations of the so‑called biological pump.
The Arctic Ocean’s clue to complex life
While Dec and colleagues were filling in the trophic gaps of the twilight zone, another group of researchers was probing a different kind of missing link in the deep Arctic Ocean. In cold, dark waters far from sunlight, they identified cells that appear to bridge the evolutionary divide between simple microbes and the complex organisms that dominate visible life today. The work, described under the banner of a Missing Link to complex life, suggests that some of the key innovations that allowed cells to develop internal compartments and more elaborate structures may have arisen in deep, stable marine environments rather than in shallow coastal zones.
The researchers behind this Arctic study emphasize how baffling the jump from simple to complex cells has always been. They invite readers to “Take one of your own cells” as an example of how intricate modern life has become, with membranes, organelles, and finely tuned molecular machinery all working in concert. By recovering and analyzing genetic material from deep Arctic samples, then carefully transporting those samples to the laboratory for processing, the team was able to identify organisms that share features with both bacteria‑like and eukaryote‑like cells. These “Complex Life Found Deep” signatures in the Arctic Ocean hint that the deep sea may have been a cradle for some of the most important steps in evolution.
Carbon fixers hiding in the abyss
The deep ocean’s role in climate hinges on how effectively it can pull carbon out of the atmosphere and lock it away for long periods. For years, models of this process have relied on the idea that photosynthetic organisms at the surface fix carbon, which then sinks as particles or is transported downward by migrating animals. Yet when scientists tried to match those models with measurements from the deep sea, they found a shortfall, as if some of the expected carbon was being processed by invisible hands. That discrepancy led to talk of “missing” carbon fixers in the abyss, organisms that must be converting inorganic carbon into organic forms in the dark but had not yet been identified.
New findings from researchers at UC Santa Barbara have started to close that gap by documenting microbes that can fix carbon in deep, low‑light environments using chemical energy rather than sunlight. By carefully sampling and analyzing water from the deep ocean, they showed that these organisms are not rare curiosities but potentially significant contributors to the global carbon budget. The work, supported by the National Science Foundation and described as a step toward understanding how the ocean sequesters carbon, reframes the abyss not as a passive sink but as an active biochemical factory. In highlighting this hidden activity, the team at Santa Barbara has effectively identified the “missing deep ocean carbon fixers” that help explain why so much carbon disappears from surface waters and stays out of the atmosphere.
Seeing the unseeable with deep‑sea cameras
Even with better sampling and genetic tools, much of the deep ocean remains stubbornly out of reach, which is why long‑term visual records are so valuable. For more than two decades, scientists at California’s Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute have been deploying remotely operated vehicles and cameras to capture images of life in the deep. Their patience has paid off in a series of otherworldly photographs that reveal animals so strange they look almost extraterrestrial, from transparent gelatinous forms to creatures with elaborate fins and filaments that seem designed for a world without light.
Among the most striking of these recent finds is a fish that has been dubbed Bathydevius caudactylus, a delicate, ribbon‑like animal whose flowing tail and elongated body give it an almost mythical appearance. Images of this and other species, collected over years of careful observation, show how much biodiversity is still waiting to be cataloged in the deep sea. They also provide crucial context for the ecological and evolutionary stories emerging from other lines of research, since every new species adds another potential link in the food web or another clue to how life adapts to extreme conditions. The long record maintained by the team in California is therefore more than a gallery of curiosities, it is a visual map of a realm that is only now coming into scientific focus.
Why these missing links matter for the surface world
When I put these strands together, from mid‑sized commuters in the twilight zone to carbon‑fixing microbes and proto‑complex cells in the Arctic, a consistent picture emerges. The deep ocean is not a remote backdrop to surface life, it is a dynamic system that shapes everything from fisheries to climate and even the evolutionary toolkit available to future organisms. The discovery that predators rely on a previously overlooked class of fish changes how we think about managing species like sharks and tunas, since any disruption to the commuters’ daily migrations, whether through overfishing or climate‑driven shifts in temperature, could ripple up the food chain in unexpected ways.
The same logic applies to carbon and evolution. If deep‑sea microbes are doing more of the planet’s carbon bookkeeping than we realized, then policies that affect ocean chemistry, such as emissions that drive acidification, may have outsized effects on the climate services the ocean provides. And if some of the key steps toward complex life took place in stable, cold, dark waters, then the deep sea becomes not just a frontier for resource extraction but a living archive of our own origins. The recent work by Dec, the teams in the Arctic Ocean, the researchers at Santa Barbara, and the observers at Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute shows that each new missing link we find in the deep ocean does more than solve a local mystery. It reshapes how we understand the planet as a whole, from the twilight zone to the air we breathe.
More from MorningOverview