China has just attempted to land a reusable rocket for the second time in three weeks, underscoring how aggressively Beijing is trying to close the gap with the United States in next generation launch technology. The latest test again fell short of a full recovery, but it still marked another step in a rapid-fire campaign of experimental flights that are reshaping the country’s space ambitions.
Instead of slowing down after an initial setback, Chinese engineers have doubled down, flying new hardware, tweaking designs and accepting visible failure as the price of catching up. The result is a high tempo of launches that signals both technological urgency and political will, even as each incomplete landing highlights how far there is still to go.
Why China is racing into reusable rocketry
China’s push into reusable launch vehicles is rooted in a simple strategic calculation: if access to orbit remains expensive, the country risks falling behind in everything from broadband constellations to deep space exploration. Reusability promises to cut the cost of each mission by recovering and reflying boosters, a model that has already transformed the economics of launch in the United States. For a government that has treated spaceflight as a pillar of national power, the idea of relying indefinitely on expendable rockets is no longer acceptable.
That urgency is sharpened by the fact that China is entering this race roughly a decade after reusable boosters were first demonstrated at scale. Chinese planners know that every year of delay risks ceding more commercial market share and strategic leverage to competitors. The result is a national effort that spans state-owned giants and nimble startups, all encouraged to iterate quickly, accept partial success and treat each failed landing as data for the next attempt.
The second landing attempt in three weeks
The latest test, described as China’s second reusable launch attempt in three weeks, was another “shot on goal” rather than a fully operational mission. Engineers again managed to send a payload to orbit, then tried to guide the booster back for a controlled descent and landing. The recovery sequence did not go as planned, but the flight still provided a trove of telemetry on engine restarts, guidance algorithms and structural loads during reentry.
What stands out is the tempo. Conducting two such tests within roughly twenty-one days suggests a deliberate strategy of rapid iteration, similar in spirit to the approach that helped American firms mature their own reusable systems. The back-to-back attempts, detailed in reports on China’s second reusable launch attempt, show that program managers are not waiting years between flights to fold in lessons learned, but are instead treating each mission as a live-fire engineering test.
Long March 12A: success to orbit, failure on landing
The most visible hardware in this campaign is the new Long March 12A, a rocket designed from the outset with reusability in mind. Its debut flight lifted off from the Jiuquan spaceport in northwestern China, successfully placing its payload into orbit before the focus shifted to the more experimental part of the mission: bringing the first stage back for a vertical landing. That recovery attempt failed, with the booster ultimately lost, but the orbital insertion itself showed that the core propulsion and staging architecture can perform as intended.
Accounts of the mission describe the Liftoff of the first Long March 12A from Jiuquan as a milestone for the country’s main launch contractor, even if the landing failure dominated headlines. Engineers now have detailed data on how the Long March behaves during ascent, separation and reentry, information that is essential for refining grid fins, engine throttling and landing leg deployment on future flights. In that sense, the mission was a classic test program tradeoff: accept a public miss on the recovery in exchange for a faster learning curve.
“Partial success” and what it really means
Chinese officials and commentators have described the second reusable rocket test as a “partial success,” a phrase that captures both the pride in incremental progress and the reality of another failed landing. From a technical standpoint, partial success usually means that key objectives, such as achieving orbit or validating a new guidance mode, were met even if the booster did not survive. It is a reminder that in experimental rocketry, the line between failure and advancement is often blurred.
Reports from Beijing framed China’s Second Reusable Rocket Test Achieves Partial Success as a meaningful step toward reducing the financial burden of space missions. By that logic, every test that validates a subsystem, even if the overall landing fails, moves the program closer to the goal of flying boosters multiple times. I read that messaging as an attempt to normalize visible setbacks, signaling to domestic audiences that perfection is not expected on the first few tries and that the long term payoff justifies the short term embarrassment.
Setbacks that highlight a decade-long gap
Despite the upbeat language, the back-to-back landing failures have sharpened scrutiny of how far China still trails the United States in reusable launch technology. Analysts have noted that Chinese state-owned and commercial developers are effectively trying to compress a decade of learning into a few years, chasing capabilities that were first proven at scale by Elon Musk’s SpaceX. The recent missteps underscore how difficult that catch-up effort will be, even with strong political backing and substantial funding.
One assessment put it bluntly, arguing that a second reusable rocket recovery failure in a month leaves Chinese ambitions roughly 10 years behind the United States. I see that gap not just in landing reliability, but in the broader ecosystem of suppliers, software, and operations that make high cadence reuse possible. Closing it will require more than copying hardware; it will demand a culture of rapid testing, tolerance for failure and continuous refinement that is still relatively new in China’s traditionally risk-averse state aerospace sector.
Commercial players and the Tianlong-3 factor
Alongside the state-led Long March family, a new generation of commercial launch firms is trying to push Chinese reusability forward from a different angle. One of the most closely watched vehicles is Tianlong-3, an orbital launch vehicle developed by the private company Space Pioneer. Tianlong-3 is designed to be reusable and to serve the booming market for satellite constellations, positioning Space Pioneer as a potential domestic rival to the state-owned giants if it can deliver reliable performance.
The development history of Tianlong shows how aggressively these firms are moving, with a maiden flight test on September 15, 2025 that signaled their readiness to compete in orbital launch. I view Tianlong-3 as a bellwether for how much room Beijing will give private actors to innovate in a domain that has long been dominated by state enterprises. If Space Pioneer can demonstrate a working reusable booster, it could accelerate the overall learning curve and push the national program toward more flexible, market-driven designs.
Three reusable rockets waiting in the wings
The Long March 12A and Tianlong-3 are not the only hardware in play. Chinese planners now have at least three reusable rockets either on the pad or nearing debut flights, a sign of how broad the effort has become. One of the three launch vehicles is expected to be the country’s first fully reusable booster and the first such system outside the United States, a symbolic milestone that would signal parity in at least one dimension of launch technology.
Reporting on how One of the three vehicles, LandSpace’s Zhuque-3 Y1, was positioned at Launch Complex 96B at Jiuquan Launch Center in November 2025 illustrates how close these projects are to real flight. I see this clustering of different reusable designs as both a strength and a challenge. It spreads technical risk across multiple architectures, but it also forces China’s space authorities to decide which concepts to back for long term operational use once the test phase ends.
Wenchang, failed tests and the cost of learning
The recent failures have not been confined to a single launch site. At WENCHANG, CHINA, a separate attempt to test domestically developed reusable rockets also ended without a successful landing, reinforcing the sense that the technology is still in its early, failure-prone phase. These tests are expensive, both financially and reputationally, especially when they are broadcast to a global audience that is quick to compare them with more polished American landings.
One account of China’s second attempt at completing a reusable rocket test noted that it was Published Tue, Dec 23 2025 12:38 AM EST, highlighting how closely international markets and observers are tracking each move. I read the figure 38 in that timestamp as a reminder that every second of these flights is scrutinized. For Chinese engineers, the cost of learning is not just measured in lost hardware, but in the pressure of performing under that global spotlight while still being expected to match or exceed foreign benchmarks.
What the Long March 12A debut tells us about the next phase
Looking back at the first Long March 12A launch, the split between a successful ascent and a failed landing offers a clear roadmap for what comes next. The rocket’s ability to reach orbit from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center shows that its core design is sound enough for operational missions, even if reusability remains aspirational. That opens the door to flying the vehicle in a partially reusable mode, where the priority is reliable payload delivery while recovery attempts are treated as secondary experiments.
Accounts noting that The first Long March 12A space launch took place from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center and ended in an unsuccessful landing make clear that engineers are already dissecting what went wrong. According to those reports, the focus now is on identifying the specific problem and taking corrective action before the next stage of tests. I expect that to mean incremental tweaks to software, engine throttling profiles and structural margins rather than wholesale redesigns, a pattern that mirrors how other reusable programs have matured.
How fast iteration could reshape China’s space future
Stepping back, the most striking feature of China’s recent activity is not any single rocket, but the willingness to fly, fail and fly again in quick succession. Two reusable landing attempts in three weeks, multiple vehicles queued for debut flights and a mix of state and commercial players all point to a shift in how the country approaches high risk aerospace development. Instead of waiting for near-certainty before testing, program leaders are accepting that some boosters will be lost on the path to a reliable reusable fleet.
If that mindset holds, the current string of “partial successes” and outright failures could, in hindsight, look like the messy but necessary foundation of a more competitive launch industry. I see the combination of Long March 12A, Tianlong-3 and Zhuque-3 Y1 as the opening act of a broader transformation that could eventually lower costs for Chinese satellite operators and expand the country’s presence in orbit. The question is not whether reusability is technically achievable, that has already been proven elsewhere, but how quickly China can internalize the lessons from each attempt and turn its rapid-fire tests into a stable, high cadence system that rivals the best in the world.
More from MorningOverview