Under pressures that would crush a car into scrap, a long standing mystery about how some of the most extreme superconductors actually work is finally giving way. By combining new measurement tricks with clever high pressure engineering, scientists have managed to probe the inner workings of materials that carry electricity with zero resistance only when squeezed to colossal densities. The result is a clearer picture of how these exotic phases emerge and a roadmap for bringing similar behavior closer to everyday conditions.
The latest breakthrough focuses on a class of “impossible” superconductors that operate at temperatures far higher than traditional metals, but only when confined in diamond anvils and subjected to pressures found deep inside planets. Cracking that puzzle required not just brute force, but a suite of new tools that can see and measure what is happening inside a sealed, microscopic chamber. I see this as a turning point, where high pressure superconductivity shifts from a black box curiosity to a system that researchers can interrogate, model and, eventually, tame.
From mercury to “impossible” superconductors
Superconductivity entered physics through a deceptively simple metal. Discovered in pure mercury by Heike Kamerlingh Onnes in 1911, the effect was first seen only at temperatures close to absolute zero, where electrical resistance vanished and magnetic fields were expelled. For decades, that set the tone, superconductors were rare, fragile states that appeared only in carefully cooled metals and alloys. The puzzle was not just why they worked, but whether nature allowed anything similar at more practical temperatures.
That picture began to fracture as researchers uncovered materials that seemed to defy the old rules, including compounds that superconduct at far higher temperatures and under extreme compression. The “impossible” label grew out of this tension, theory said such behavior should be difficult, yet experiments kept turning up surprises in complex materials and under high pressure. The modern challenge is to connect those early, clean systems like mercury with the messy, strongly interacting compounds that now dominate the frontier, and to understand how pressure, chemistry and quantum mechanics conspire to produce zero resistance in such hostile environments.
Hydrides and the race to room temperature
The most dramatic leap in that race has come from hydrogen rich compounds, or hydrides, that only become superconducting when squeezed to ultrahigh pressures. Over the past six years (2015–2021), researchers have reported many superconducting hydrides with critical temperatures TC up to 250 K, a figure that brushes against the freezing point of water and would have been unthinkable in the era of liquid helium cooled metals. These compounds, often based on hydrogen combined with elements like sulfur or lanthanum, are stabilized only when compressed between diamond tips to pressures of hundreds of gigapascals.
Over the course of the following few years, other hydrides have followed, most notably lanthanum hydride (LaH10), which has been reported with a critical temperature of ∼ 260 K. These numbers are tantalizing, they suggest that, in principle, superconductivity at or above room temperature is compatible with known physics, provided the lattice is squeezed hard enough. The catch is that such pressures are utterly impractical for power grids or MRI scanners, which is why the field has been haunted by a central question, can the same mechanisms be harnessed at lower pressures, or even at ambient conditions, without losing the high transition temperatures that make hydrides so exciting?
The measurement problem inside a diamond anvil
Answering that question has been hampered by a basic experimental obstacle, it is extraordinarily difficult to measure anything inside a diamond anvil cell without disturbing it. The sample is tiny, the chamber is sealed, and the pressures are so high that conventional probes simply cannot be inserted. As one group put it, the problem is that you cannot just stick a sensor or a probe inside because everything is closed off and at very high pressures, which is why sensor design has become a frontier in its own right. Without reliable ways to map magnetic fields, current flow or electronic gaps, claims about high temperature superconductivity under pressure can be hard to verify or interpret.
That is why a new generation of tools is so important. In Feb, a team at Harvard researchers now believe they have a foundational tool for the thorny problem of how to measure and image the behavior of superconductors under pressure, using a device that can sit outside the diamond cell yet still track how a tiny sample will hover over a magnet. By effectively turning the sealed chamber into something that can be “seen” from the outside, these Harvard advances promise to turn qualitative hints into quantitative data, a prerequisite for solving any deep puzzle about how these materials actually work.
Peeking inside with X-rays and tunneling spectroscopy
Even with better external sensors, I find that understanding a superconductor’s internal structure requires more direct imaging of atoms and electrons. That is where large scale facilities come in. They ( the scientists ) used the facility, which had recently undergone a major upgrade, to shoot high energy X-rays through near room temperature superconductors and watch how the arrangement of atoms in the material controls its superconducting abilities. By correlating subtle shifts in crystal structure with the onset of zero resistance, the They in this work have shown that even tiny distortions can make or break superconductivity, especially in complex hydrides and related compounds.
To solve a different but related problem, researchers at the Max Planck Institute in Mainz developed a planar electron tunneling spectroscopy setup that can operate under crushing pressures. By measuring how electrons tunnel through a barrier into a high pressure sample, they were able to determine the superconducting gap in H3S for the first time, directly probing the energy scale that pairs electrons together. This Max Planck Institute work in Mainz effectively opens a window into the electronic heart of a material that had previously been known mostly through indirect signatures like resistance drops and magnetic response, turning a once opaque system into one that can be mapped and compared with theory.
Triplet superconductivity and exotic pairing under pressure
Not all high pressure superconductors behave like conventional hydrides, and that diversity is part of what makes the field so rich. In Apr, a different line of research showed that, with the new insight, scientists can now explain what happens in the enigmatic uranium material UBe13 at the atomic scale, revealing a form of triplet superconductivity that survives under high magnetic fields. This kind of pairing, where electrons align their spins rather than forming the usual singlet state, is rare and often fragile, yet under pressure it can become stabilized in ways that challenge standard models. The With the study of UBe13 underscores that pressure is not just a knob for raising transition temperatures, it can fundamentally alter the symmetry of the superconducting state.
I see this as a crucial piece of the broader puzzle, because it shows that extreme conditions can unlock phases that might be inaccessible otherwise. Triplet superconductors are attractive for applications like spintronics and quantum computing, where the spin of electrons carries information, and understanding how pressure stabilizes them could inspire new material designs. When combined with the hydride story, it becomes clear that there is no single “high pressure superconductor,” but a landscape of different pairing mechanisms, each with its own sensitivity to lattice structure, magnetism and electronic correlations.
Quenching pressure: stabilizing superconductors at everyday conditions
Of course, no matter how elegant the physics is at hundreds of gigapascals, practical technologies demand materials that work at or near ambient pressure. That is why I pay close attention to efforts that bridge the gap between diamond anvil cells and the lab bench. Researchers at the University of Houston overcame these limitations by using their pressure quench technique to stabilize a superconducting material at everyday pressure, even though it had originally required extreme compression to form. By rapidly releasing the load in a controlled way, the team managed to “freeze in” a high pressure phase that remains superconducting at low temperatures, around −457 degrees Fahrenheit, without the need for constant squeezing.
This approach does not yet deliver room temperature superconductivity in a wire you can buy, but it does show that the structural motifs responsible for high performance can sometimes be preserved outside their native pressure range. The new protocol also opens a path for systematically exploring which phases can survive decompression and how their properties evolve, a strategy that could be extended to other hydrides and complex compounds. In that sense, the Researchers at the University of Houston are not just solving an engineering problem, they are testing how robust the underlying quantum states really are when the crushing force is removed.
A new generation of precision tools under pressure
Behind all of these advances lies a quiet revolution in instrumentation. In Feb, Harvard researchers now believe they have a foundational tool for the thorny problem of how to measure and image the behavior of superconductors under pressure, and that work is part of a broader push to turn diamond anvil cells into fully fledged laboratories rather than blunt instruments. By integrating magnetic sensing, transport measurements and optical probes into compact setups, teams are starting to track how a sample will hover over a magnet, how its resistance collapses and how its lattice vibrates, all as a function of pressure and temperature. These capabilities transform high pressure experiments from one off demonstrations into reproducible, data rich studies.
I see a similar trend in the way X-ray imaging and tunneling spectroscopy are being adapted to the constraints of tiny, sealed chambers. The combination of high energy beams, sensitive detectors and clever sample environments allows scientists to watch atoms rearrange and electronic gaps open in real time as pressure is ramped up. When such measurements are cross checked with theoretical predictions for hydrides with TC up to 250 K and with direct gap measurements in H3S, the field gains a level of confidence that was previously missing. The result is that the phrase “scientists solve a superconductor puzzle under extreme pressure” is no longer a metaphor for guesswork under duress, it reflects a genuine ability to interrogate and understand materials in some of the harshest conditions that can be created on Earth.
What the extreme pressure puzzle means for the future
Putting these threads together, I see a coherent narrative emerging from what once looked like scattered curiosities. Discovered anomalies in pure mercury by Heike Kamerlingh Onnes have evolved into a rich zoo of superconductors, from hydrides with critical temperatures near 260 K under ultrahigh pressures to uranium based compounds with triplet pairing stabilized by compression. The combination of pressure quench techniques, new sensors that can operate outside sealed cells, and spectroscopic tools that reach into the heart of H3S and related materials has turned extreme pressure superconductivity into a test bed for fundamental physics. It is now possible to ask not just whether a material superconducts, but exactly how its electrons pair, how its lattice responds and how those features change as the crushing force is dialed up or down.
The practical payoff may still be years away, yet the direction of travel is clear. As researchers learn to stabilize high pressure phases at everyday conditions, as at the University of Houston, and to image near room temperature superconductors with upgraded X-ray facilities, the gap between diamond anvils and deployable technologies will narrow. I expect that the techniques honed in these extreme environments will spill over into more conventional materials science, informing the design of new alloys, oxides and hydrides that do not need planetary pressures to perform. In that sense, the superconductor puzzle solved under extreme pressure is not an isolated triumph, it is a blueprint for how to tackle other quantum materials that only reveal their secrets when pushed to the edge.
More from MorningOverview