Every living thing on Earth appears to carry a hidden shimmer, a vanishingly faint light that is woven into the chemistry of life itself. That glow is so weak that our eyes will never see it unaided, yet sensitive instruments now show that it is real and that it fades away when an organism dies. Scientists are beginning to treat this ultra‑dim radiance not as mysticism but as a measurable signal that tracks metabolism, stress and, ultimately, the boundary between life and death.
Researchers describe this phenomenon in the language of physics and biology, but the idea is simple enough to grasp: living cells leak tiny numbers of photons as they burn energy and repair damage, and when that activity stops, the light goes dark. I see this emerging field as one of the most striking examples of how modern imaging can turn an old metaphor, the “spark of life,” into something you can actually count.
What scientists mean by a “faint glow”
When physicists talk about a glow from living tissue, they are not describing the bright flashes of fireflies or deep‑sea creatures. They are talking about what researchers call ultraweak photon emission, a stream of visible and near‑visible photons so sparse that it takes long exposures and exquisitely sensitive cameras to detect it. One early imaging study reported that “virtually all living organisms emit extremely weak light, spontaneously without external photoexcitation,” and that this emission can be recorded from the human body over the course of a day using cooled charge‑coupled devices and photon counting techniques that reveal visible photons from healthy skin.
In technical terms, these emissions are often called biophotons, a word that comes from the Greek “bios” for life and refers specifically to “spontaneous ultraweak photon emission” from biological systems. In this narrow sense, biophotons are distinct from the broader field of biophotonics, which covers any interaction between light and living tissue, from laser surgery to fluorescence microscopy, but the core idea is that living cells themselves are a source of light at intensities far below ordinary bioluminescence, a distinction that is spelled out in definitions of biophoton emission.
From “ghostly glow” to measurable signal
The notion that organisms emit a “ghostly glow” has long hovered at the edge of science and speculation, but recent work has dragged it into the realm of quantifiable data. Reporting on experiments from the University of Calgary describes how researchers framed the effect as a subtle, intrinsic light that is “extremely hard to detect” but can be captured with modern photon‑counting cameras, and they argue that this signal could eventually be used in medical examinations to assess tissue health by tracking how the glow changes with metabolism and disease in controlled laboratory settings, a claim tied to the University of Calgary work.
In that coverage, the researchers are quoted as saying that “living things emit a faint, visible light” that has proven “extremely hard to detect,” precisely because it is many orders of magnitude weaker than daylight or even the light from a single candle. The team’s approach, which relies on shielding samples from all external illumination and then integrating the tiny photon counts over time, is presented as a way to turn that poetic “ghostly glow” into a reproducible measurement, and the description of this faint emission as a universal property of organisms is anchored to the claim that living things emit a faint light.
Biophotons, chemistry and the machinery of life
At the cellular level, the leading explanation for this light is not anything mystical but the chemistry of reactive oxygen species and excited molecules that form as cells process energy. A technical overview of “Biophoton Emission and Reactive Oxygen Species in Biological Systems” describes biophoton emission, often referred to as ultraweak photon emission, as a byproduct of oxidative metabolic reactions and notes that these photons can reveal information about a cell’s biochemical and biophysical properties, linking the glow directly to reactive oxygen chemistry.
More broadly, reviews of the field describe biophotons as an “endogenous very small production of photons in the visible energy range in and from cells and organisms,” and they emphasize that these emissions are tied to fundamental processes such as mitochondrial respiration, membrane oxidation and the relaxation of electronically excited states in biomolecules. One such analysis, published in Jun and framed as “Biophotons: A Hard Problem,” stresses that the photons are so sparse that they push the limits of current detectors, yet they still carry information about unmeasured quantities inside cells, a point that is captured in the description of Jun biophotons.
A glow that stops at death
The most provocative claim in this emerging science is that the light is a signature of life itself, present while metabolism runs and gone when it stops. A detailed blog essay titled “Visible Light That Disappears At Death” describes a set of experiments in which researchers monitored ultraweak visible light from living organisms and reported that the emission, described as a biophoton signal, “ceased immediately” when the organism died, a finding that the author frames as a discovery at the intersection of biology and physics and that is summarized in the section on visible light that disappears.
In that same account, the writer notes that the team took care to rule out simple artifacts such as cooling of the body, reporting that researchers ensured the bodies were kept at a constant temperature and that the fading light was concentrated in the red‑orange spectrum, which is consistent with specific oxidative reactions rather than thermal glow. The blog’s broader discussion, which is collected under the heading “Humans Emit a Visible Light That Disappears at Death,” treats this abrupt loss of emission as evidence that the glow is tightly coupled to active physiology, and it is this framing that underpins the description of red‑orange biophoton emission and the more general claim that Humans Emit visible light that vanishes when life ends.
From mice in the lab to a broader biological rule
Some of the most vivid demonstrations of this effect come from animal experiments that have been shared widely in both scientific and popular formats. One video explainer, titled “Wow! Living Beings Emit Faint Light That Disappears Upon …,” walks viewers through an image of a mouse that is no longer alive and points out that the picture shows a once‑bright outline fading to darkness, using the example to illustrate how the glow is present in life and gone in death, a narrative that is tied to the clip of the mouse that passed away.
Another widely circulated visual comes from a short piece that states, “Once the mice were euthanized, the light faded even though their bodies were kept warm to rule out temperature as a factor,” and goes on to note that stressed or diseased animals emit more of this tiny visible light than healthy ones. That description, which appears in a captioned image about scientists discovering faint visible light emitted by all living creatures, reinforces the idea that the emission is a dynamic signal of physiological state and that its disappearance at death is not a slow cooling effect but a sharp loss of photon production, as summarized in the line that once the mice were euthanized, the light faded.
How ultraweak photon emission is detected
Capturing such a faint signal requires technology that would have been unthinkable a few decades ago. Reviews of ultraweak bioluminescence, also known as ultraweak photon emission (UPE), explain that researchers use photomultiplier tubes, cooled CCD cameras and photon counting electronics that can register individual photons over long integration times, and they contrast this with the much brighter luminescence of fireflies, which can be seen with the naked eye. One technical summary notes that UPE is now recognized as one of the functional characteristics of living systems and that advances in detector sensitivity have expanded the range of biological samples that can be studied, a point that is laid out in the Abstract on ultraweak photon emission.
These instruments are typically deployed in dark, temperature‑controlled chambers where samples are shielded from stray light and electromagnetic interference, and the resulting photon counts are analyzed statistically to extract patterns over time. A broader news feature on the topic notes that “all living things emit a subtle glow that ceases at the time of death” and identifies this as ultraweak photon emission, emphasizing that living organisms have always been a source of light but that only now do we have the technology to see it at such low levels, a framing that is captured in the description that all living organisms emit a subtle glow that stops when they die.
From yeast to human skin and the human brain
One of the striking themes in the literature is how universal this phenomenon appears to be. A short explainer on brain science notes that later studies confirmed that organisms “from yeast to human skin” emit light and that these emissions can change in response to environmental conditions, stress and other stimuli, suggesting that biophoton output is a general feature of living cells rather than a quirk of a few exotic species. That same piece, titled “5‑Min Science: Your Brain Emits Biophotons,” highlights that the human brain itself produces these ultraweak photons, although they are far too dim to see and their role in neural processing remains speculative, a point that is summarized in the line that later studies confirmed light from yeast to human skin.Separate work on human subjects has shown that people spontaneously emit visible radiation from their skin, which researchers classify as biophoton or ultraweak photon emission, and that this output can increase under certain conditions. One study, summarized in an abstract on spontaneous human biophoton emission, reports that humans emit this light continuously and that its intensity can be modulated by metabolic changes, reinforcing the idea that the glow is a baseline feature of our physiology, a conclusion that is embedded in the description that humans spontaneously emit visible radiation from their skin.
Biophotons as a communication network
Some researchers go further and argue that biophotons are not just metabolic noise but part of a subtle communication system inside the body. A conceptual paper on “The concept of biophotonic signaling in the human body and brain” states that biophotons are carriers of energy and information and that biophoton signaling is a complex scientific view of how cells might coordinate activity using light, adding that modern scientific data confirms this possibility in principle even if the details remain under active investigation, a position that is summarized in the section on biophotons as carriers of information.
Popular science writing has picked up this theme, describing how cells emit weak light particles called biophotons that may form a communication network in our bodies. One such piece explains that these photons are extremely weak, yet they appear to be produced in structures like mitochondria and the microtubule cytoskeleton, hinting at a link between the cell’s energy factories, its structural scaffolding and its light emissions, and it presents this as part of “the light within our cells,” a phrase that is tied to the description of cells emitting weak light particles.
Life, stress and the changing brightness of the body
Beyond the simple on‑off contrast between life and death, scientists are finding that the intensity and pattern of this glow shift with stress, disease and environmental pressure. A news feature titled “Humans and All Living Things May Emit a Glow in Life, but Not Death” reports that researchers see these tiny, weak signals of light as potentially useful tools for monitoring health, because they appear to rise when cells are under oxidative stress and fall when conditions normalize, and it frames this as a way to track the “glow in life, but not death” across species, a phrase that is captured in the description of Humans and All Living Things May Emit a Glow in Life, Not Death.
Short social‑media explainers echo this link between stress and light, noting that researchers believe the glow comes from reactive oxygen species, molecules that cells make when they are under pressure, and that these molecules are central to both normal signaling and damaging oxidative reactions. One such clip states that these molecules are produced when cells are stressed and that the associated light disappears at death, reinforcing the idea that the glow is a dynamic readout of cellular struggle rather than a static halo, a framing that is summarized in the line that researchers believe the glow comes from molecules.
Comparing biophotons with other natural light, from fireflies to fluorescent plants
To understand how unusual this ultraweak glow is, it helps to compare it with more familiar biological light. The same technical overview that defines UPE points out that the luminescence of fireflies is many orders of magnitude brighter and is produced by specialized enzymes and substrates that evolved specifically for signaling, whereas ultraweak photon emission is a background feature of ordinary metabolism that occurs in virtually all cells, a contrast that is laid out in the discussion of firefly luminescence and UPE.
There are also other ways that living things interact with light that can be confused with biophotons but are fundamentally different. Field reports from Malaysia, for example, describe how carnivorous pitcher plants show striking biofluorescence, glowing under ultraviolet illumination in patterns that appear to change with the age and health of each pitcher, and this effect is documented in an expedition that set out “whilst on an expedition to document biofluorescence in Malaysia” and found multiple biofluorescent species whose brightness tracked their condition, a phenomenon that is summarized in the account of biofluorescent pitcher plants.
Why this matters for medicine and our picture of life
For medicine, the promise of this research lies in the possibility of noninvasive diagnostics that read health directly from the body’s own light. The University of Calgary team, for instance, has suggested that tracking the faint glow from tissues could help doctors assess organ viability, monitor the progression of disease and perhaps even refine the timing of death in critical care, since the emission appears to cease sharply when metabolic activity stops, a potential application that is hinted at in their discussion of using the glow in medical examinations of tissue health.
At a more philosophical level, the idea that all living things emit a subtle, vanishing light reshapes how I think about the boundary between the animate and the inanimate. Technical reviews emphasize that biophotons are an intrinsic feature of living chemistry, while popular accounts like “Visible Light That Disappears At Death” and “Humans and All Living Things May Emit a Glow in Life, but Not Death” invite readers to see that chemistry as a kind of inner radiance. The science is still young, and some claims about signaling and consciousness remain unverified based on available sources, but the core observation is now well supported: life flickers with an ultraweak glow, and when life ends, that flicker goes out.
More from MorningOverview