General Motors is quietly running one of the most consequential leadership experiments in modern auto history, and it centers on a veteran of Tesla Autopilot. Sterling Anderson, who helped build Tesla’s driver-assistance system and later co-founded a major self-driving startup, is now being tested as the possible successor to Mary Barra at GM. If he gets the job, the country’s largest legacy automaker would be led by an engineer whose career has been defined by software, sensors, and autonomy rather than factory floors and dealer networks.
The prospect of Tesla’s former Autopilot chief taking the wheel at GM is more than a corporate reshuffle. It is a signal of how far the industry has moved toward treating code and data as the core of the car business, and it raises sharp questions about whether a Silicon Valley–style technologist can steer a century-old manufacturer through its most turbulent transition in decades.
GM’s succession test moves into the fast lane
GM’s leadership search has shifted from abstract boardroom planning to a live-fire trial centered on Sterling Anderson. Reporting describes him as the executive leading General Motors’ technology push and emerging as the front-runner in a structured CEO succession test, a process framed around the question of Who Next will run the company. The board is not simply compiling résumés, it is watching how Anderson performs in a role designed to stress his ability to align software-heavy product strategy with GM’s sprawling manufacturing and dealer operations.
Several accounts say General Motors is actively weighing the former Tesla Autopilot chief for the top job, describing internal deliberations about Sterling Anderson for CEO as part of a broader strategy to accelerate its technology roadmap. Another report characterizes GM as “reportedly looking at an ex-Tesla executive to be its next CEO,” underscoring that this is not a speculative long list but a focused evaluation of a specific candidate whose background is unusually weighted toward autonomy and software.
From Tesla Autopilot to Detroit power broker
Sterling Anderson’s candidacy matters because of where he comes from. At Tesla, he led Tesla Autopilot, the driver-assistance system that helped define the modern conversation around semi-automated driving. That role put him at the center of a high-stakes experiment in over-the-air updates, sensor fusion, and human–machine interaction, experience that now looks directly relevant to GM’s ambitions for hands-free systems like Super Cruise and Ultra Cruise. His time inside Tesla also gave him a front-row view of how a software-first carmaker organizes engineering, launches features, and markets automation to consumers.
After leaving Tesla, Anderson did not retreat from autonomy, he doubled down on it. He co-founded Aurora, a self-driving technology company that has grown into a major player in autonomous freight and logistics, and served as its chief product officer. The company, which presents itself as Aurora and focuses on driverless trucks and commercial applications, gave him experience in building safety cases, working with regulators, and integrating autonomy into real-world fleets. That combination of Tesla’s consumer-facing Autopilot and Aurora’s commercial self-driving work is precisely the kind of hybrid background GM now appears to value.
Aurora, freight autonomy, and the GM connection
Anderson’s Aurora chapter is not just a résumé line, it is a bridge between Silicon Valley software culture and the gritty logistics of freight. At Aurora he most recently co-founded and served as chief product officer at Aurora Innovation, a self-driving truck startup that began running driverless trucks on public roads, a milestone that required deep collaboration with shippers, safety experts, and state regulators. That work forced Anderson to think beyond the car as a consumer gadget and into the realm of uptime, route optimization, and total cost of ownership, all central concerns for GM’s commercial customers.
GM’s interest in that experience is explicit. One detailed account notes that Anderson was most recently chief product officer at Aurora, which he co-founded with CEO Chris Urmson and others, before GM hired him. Another report describes how GM reportedly considers ex-Aurora, Tesla Autopilot head Sterling Anderson as next CEO, explicitly tying his Aurora Innovation and Tesla Autopilot credentials to the succession conversation. In other words, GM is not just hiring a technologist, it is testing whether a freight-focused autonomy veteran can run a diversified global automaker.
The chief product officer as audition
GM has effectively turned the chief product officer role into a proving ground. Anderson joined the company as its first chief product officer earlier this year, a newly created position that gives him sweeping influence over the software and hardware roadmap. One report notes that Anderson joined the company as chief product officer hired this year and is emerging as front-runner to succeed Mary Barra, a dynamic summarized in a piece whose Key Takeaways highlight how his performance in this role is being watched as a succession test. The job gives him direct responsibility for aligning GM’s EV platforms, software-defined vehicle strategy, and advanced driver-assistance systems.
Other coverage frames this as a deliberate trial by fire. One detailed report on GM’s internal debate notes that the company considers the former Tesla Autopilot head as next CEO and describes the chief product officer assignment as a kind of trial by fire for Anderson, with the board watching how he navigates software delays, EV profitability challenges, and the integration of new autonomy features. The same report notes that the story drew 38 Comments, a small but telling sign of how closely investors and enthusiasts are tracking his rise.
Mary Barra’s legacy and the board’s calculus
Any discussion of Anderson’s prospects has to start with Mary Barra’s tenure. She has spent years trying to reposition GM as a technology-forward company, pushing into electric vehicles, software platforms, and advanced driver assistance while managing the legacy of internal combustion and a vast dealer network. Reports that General Motors Eyes Ex, Tesla Employee Sterling Anderson As Potential Successor To CEO Mary Barra, Report suggest the board wants continuity on that tech-heavy trajectory, but with fresh execution tactics drawn from Tesla and Aurora. The question is whether a successor steeped in autonomy can also manage labor relations, capital allocation, and global regulatory risk at GM’s scale.
Another account notes that GM Eyes Ex-Tesla Autopilot Exec Sterling Anderson As Potential CEO Successor To Mary Barra, Report, and explicitly ties that interest to General Motors Co. and his status as a co-founder of Aurora, highlighting how the board is weighing his startup credentials against the demands of a public industrial giant. That report, which frames the story as Eyes Ex Tesla Autopilot Exec Sterling Anderson As Potential CEO Successor To Mary Barra, Report, underscores that investors see this as a bet on software and autonomy as the core of GM’s future value. For the board, the calculus is whether that bet can be made without losing the operational discipline that has kept GM profitable through multiple industry cycles.
What a Tesla-style leader could change at GM
If Anderson ultimately becomes CEO, I expect his influence to show up first in how GM organizes its engineering and product cycles. His Tesla Autopilot background suggests a bias toward rapid iteration, over-the-air feature deployment, and tight integration between hardware and software teams, a contrast with the more segmented structures that have historically defined Detroit. Reports that GM is reportedly looking at an ex-Tesla executive to be its next CEO and that General Motors appears to be considering such a move indicate a desire to import some of that Tesla-style agility into GM’s product development process.
There are also hints that GM wants a leader who can better connect its technology narrative to consumers. One video segment framed GM’s hiring of Anderson as a moment to “buckle up” for a story with “serious horsepower,” describing how GM snags Tesla’s Autopilot boss and asking whether this is the start of an EV rivalry, a framing captured in a clip titled GM Snags Tesla’s Autopilot Boss. That kind of storytelling, which leans into rivalry and performance rather than pure sustainability messaging, could foreshadow how a CEO with Anderson’s background might market GM’s next generation of EVs and driver-assistance features.
The internal politics of a tech-first succession
Installing a technologist at the top of GM would inevitably reshape internal power dynamics. Longtime manufacturing, purchasing, and regional leaders would be reporting to a CEO whose formative experiences were in software and autonomy startups rather than in GM’s traditional ladder of plant management and regional assignments. One report that asks who is next at General Motors and identifies Sterling Anderson as the executive leading GM’s technology push notes that this succession test is as much about cultural fit as technical vision, with the board watching how he collaborates across legacy divisions.
Another detailed account of GM’s internal deliberations describes how GM reportedly considers ex-Aurora, Tesla Autopilot head Sterling Anderson as next CEO and places that story in a Saved List of News focused on leadership and technology. That framing hints at the sensitivity of the process, with sources emphasizing that discussions are private and that some insiders are cautious about elevating a relative newcomer over veterans who have spent decades inside GM. The outcome will signal to employees whether the company’s future promotions will favor software and autonomy expertise or continue to reward traditional operational paths.
What this means for the wider EV and autonomy race
GM’s flirtation with a Tesla Autopilot alumnus for its top job is already rippling through the broader EV and autonomy landscape. One analysis framed the moment as a shift “from leading Tesla Autopilot to running GM,” noting that Bloomberg reported on the succession test and that The Verge highlighted how such a move would crystallize GM’s identity as a technology company, a narrative captured in a piece that explicitly links The Verge and Bloomberg coverage. If GM ultimately hands the keys to Anderson, it would mark one of the clearest endorsements yet of autonomy veterans as full-spectrum auto CEOs, not just niche technologists.
At the same time, the reporting that GM Eyes Ex-Tesla Autopilot Exec Sterling Anderson As Potential CEO Successor To Mary Barra, Report and that General Motors Eyes Ex, Tesla Employee Sterling Anderson As Potential Successor To CEO Mary Barra, Report underscores how investors are reading this as a competitive response to Tesla and other EV players. By elevating someone who helped build Tesla Autopilot and Aurora Innovation, GM would be signaling that it intends to compete head-on in software-defined vehicles, not just in battery range or sticker price. Whether that strategy pays off will depend on execution, but the succession test now underway shows that GM’s board understands the stakes and is willing to consider a very different kind of leader to meet them.
More from MorningOverview