Corporate leaders are preparing to pour even more money into artificial intelligence in 2026, even as many still struggle to prove that the technology is delivering clear financial returns. AI has moved from experimental pilot to boardroom priority, but the gap between ambition and measurable impact is becoming harder to ignore.
Instead of pulling back, CEOs are treating that uncertainty as a reason to accelerate, not pause, their spending. They are betting that the companies that master AI first will define their industries, even if the payoff takes longer than investors might like.
The new AI spending wave in the C-suite
In the space of just a few years, AI has shifted from a side project to a central line item in corporate budgets, and the next budget cycle looks even more aggressive. I see a pattern emerging in which AI is no longer framed as a discretionary innovation expense but as a core capability that CEOs feel compelled to fund, even when the business case is still forming. That shift is clearest in the C-suite, where leaders are now expected to understand not just what AI is, but exactly how much they are willing to spend on it.
Research on AI in the C-suite shows that executives are scrutinizing how much they are really spending and where the money is going, with budgets increasingly tied to specific use cases rather than vague innovation mandates. In that research, roughly 69 percent of CEOs plan to allocate more to AI in 2026 than in 2025, a figure that signals how deeply AI has penetrated strategic planning. The same analysis describes how 2026 is the year AI moves from experiment to embedded capability in the Suite, which helps explain why boards are pressing for more detailed breakdowns of investments across infrastructure, data, and applications instead of treating AI as a single monolithic cost.
CEOs signal bigger AI budgets despite uneven returns
Even with that shift toward more structured planning, the returns from AI remain patchy, and many companies are still in the early stages of turning pilots into scaled products. Yet the spending trajectory is not flattening. I see CEOs treating early stumbles as the cost of entry into a technology race they believe they cannot afford to lose, rather than as a warning sign to slow down. The result is a paradox: more money is flowing into AI at the very moment when its financial impact is most contested.
Research by Teneo captures that tension clearly, showing that CEOs are planning on increasing AI spending in 2026 even as they acknowledge that turning those investments into productivity gains and revenue growth has proved more difficult than expected. The analysis notes that many leaders are still wrestling with how to integrate AI into legacy systems and how to redeploy human resources when automation reshapes workflows. By Sophie Brooks reports that executives are pressing on with AI spending despite uneven returns, a signal that they see the technology as a long game rather than a quick win.
From experimentation to scaled deployment in 2026
The next phase of AI adoption is less about flashy demos and more about the unglamorous work of scaling. I see 2026 as a pivot year in which companies move from isolated proofs of concept to enterprise-wide deployment, with all the governance, risk management, and change management that implies. That transition is expensive, which is one reason budgets are rising even as ROI remains uncertain.
In the C-suite research, 2026 is described as the year AI moves from experimen to embedded capability, with CEOs reallocating funds from small pilots to large-scale platforms that touch customer service, supply chains, and internal decision support. That same analysis details how leaders are segmenting their AI portfolios, distinguishing between foundational investments in data infrastructure and more targeted spending on applications that promise near-term gains. The shift from experimentation to deployment is also driving new governance structures in the Suite, as boards demand clearer oversight of AI risks and ethics alongside the push for growth.
Why CEOs are comfortable spending ahead of clear ROI
For many CEOs, the lack of immediate, clean ROI metrics is not a deterrent but an accepted feature of investing in a general-purpose technology. I see them drawing parallels to earlier waves of digital transformation, where the biggest payoffs came only after years of foundational investment in cloud, data, and software. In that context, spending ahead of clear returns is framed as a strategic necessity rather than a reckless gamble.
The paradox at the heart of this strategy is captured in The Artificial Intelligence (AI) ROI Report, which describes a critical tension in the Gen AI revolution. There is a recognition that while some organizations are already seeing tangible benefits, others are struggling to move beyond experimentation because of the current maturity of the market. The report notes, for instance, that a Financial IT example illustrates how difficult it can be to quantify returns when AI is woven into complex processes rather than isolated in a single product. There is also an acknowledgment that Gen AI requires new ways of measuring value, from reduced cycle times to improved decision quality, which do not always show up immediately in traditional financial metrics.
How much more CEOs expect to spend in 2026
Behind the rhetoric about AI transformation sit very real numbers, and those numbers are climbing. I see a convergence across surveys and executive briefings that points to a clear direction of travel: more money, more projects, and more pressure to show progress by the end of 2026. The scale of that commitment matters because it will shape everything from hiring plans to vendor ecosystems.
One analysis of AI budgets notes that Artificial intelligence (AI) spending will continue to rise in 2026, with 68 percent of CEOs planning to increase their allocations compared with the previous year. That figure aligns with the C-suite finding that roughly 69 percent of CEOs intend to spend more, suggesting a broad consensus at the top of large firms. Another report on AI spending in 2026 underscores that this is not a one-off spike but part of a long-term upward curve, with leaders expecting AI to remain a growing share of technology budgets for several years.
Where the AI money is going inside large companies
Rising budgets are only half the story; the other half is how that money is being distributed inside organizations. I see a clear pattern in which CEOs are shifting from generic AI experimentation to more targeted investments in specific functions, such as customer experience, risk management, and operations. That shift reflects a growing recognition that AI is not a single product but a toolkit that must be tailored to each part of the business.
The C-suite analysis of where the money is going shows that CEOs are directing funds toward both core infrastructure and front-line applications. Spending is flowing into data platforms, model development, and integration tools, but also into AI-powered customer support, marketing personalization, and decision support systems for managers. The same research highlights that the Suite is increasingly involved in prioritizing these investments, with leaders weighing trade-offs between short-term efficiency gains and longer-term bets on new AI-enabled products and services.
Investor pressure, competitive fear, and the AI arms race
Behind the boardroom enthusiasm for AI lies a more anxious driver: fear of being left behind. I see CEOs responding not only to the promise of AI but also to the perception that competitors are moving faster, especially in sectors like finance, retail, and manufacturing. That sense of an arms race is reinforced by investors who now routinely ask management teams to spell out their AI strategies on earnings calls and in shareholder letters.
Coverage of CEO sentiment notes that top executives at large firms are preparing to increase their spending on artificial intelligence as part of a broader push to keep skill acquisition and digital capabilities at the max. A News Editor on LinkedIn highlights that this is not just about technology for its own sake, but about signaling to markets that leadership is serious about staying ahead of disruption. The same reporting notes that Dec has become a key moment for firms to outline their AI roadmaps for the coming year, with many CEOs using year-end communications to emphasize their commitment to continued investment.
Uneven success stories and the ROI paradox
For every polished AI success story, there are quieter examples of projects that stalled, underdelivered, or created new complexities. I see this uneven track record as central to understanding why ROI remains so elusive. Some companies are already using AI to automate routine tasks, personalize digital experiences, or detect fraud more effectively, while others are still wrestling with data quality, change resistance, and unclear ownership.
The Artificial Intelligence ROI Report describes how There is a critical paradox at the heart of the Gen AI revolution, with some organizations reporting strong gains while others see little measurable impact despite similar levels of spending. The report points to examples such as a Financial IT implementation that struggled to deliver expected savings because of integration challenges and the current maturity of the market. That kind of case study helps explain why many CEOs are still searching for the right metrics and governance structures to ensure that AI investments translate into sustainable value rather than isolated wins.
New roles, new skills, and the human side of AI spending
As AI budgets grow, the human implications are becoming more visible, from new job titles to shifting skill requirements. I see companies moving away from the simplistic narrative of AI as a job destroyer and toward a more nuanced view that emphasizes reconfiguration of work. That does not eliminate anxiety, but it does change the conversation inside many organizations about what AI adoption actually means for employees.
Reporting on CEO attitudes notes that leaders seem determined to keep spending on AI despite mixed success, and that new job titles, like decision designer and AI experience officer, are emerging to manage an era of human-AI collaboration. That same coverage notes that it is not that AI is wiping out the workforce today, but that roles are evolving as automation takes over certain tasks and frees people to focus on higher-value work. The creation of these positions signals that CEOs are not only buying technology but also investing in the talent and governance needed to make AI a durable part of how their companies operate.
Why the AI spending surge is likely to continue
Looking across the data and executive sentiment, I do not see much evidence that AI spending will plateau in 2026. If anything, the combination of competitive pressure, board expectations, and the slow burn of ROI measurement suggests that budgets will keep rising even as companies refine their strategies. The key question is less whether CEOs will spend and more how quickly they can turn that spending into durable advantages.
Analyses of AI investment patterns, from the Teneo research to the C-suite breakdowns and the AI ROI Report, all point to a world in which Dec planning cycles are increasingly dominated by AI decisions. CEOs are pressing on with AI spending despite uneven returns, with 68 percent and roughly 69 percent of leaders signaling higher budgets and many framing 2026 as the year AI moves from experimen to embedded capability. The stakes are high: companies that manage to align their AI investments with clear business outcomes, robust governance, and thoughtful workforce strategies will be best positioned to justify the surge in spending when the next round of ROI questions arrives.
Supporting sources: CEOs to double down on AI spending in 2026.
More from MorningOverview