Detroit’s biggest truck maker has just delivered a blunt verdict on the first wave of electric pickups: the numbers do not work. After years of marketing battery trucks as the future of American work and status, the industry is now conceding that the flagship models were mispriced, misaligned with buyers and misjudged on policy support.
The retreat is not the end of electric vehicles, but it is the end of a particular experiment in “statement” trucks that tried to bolt a culture war onto a fragile business case. What is emerging in its place is a more hard‑nosed strategy built around smaller, cheaper EVs, hybrids and plug‑in workhorses that match how people actually drive and what they can afford.
Detroit’s electric truck dream hits a wall
The pivot started with a simple admission from Detroit: the first generation of big electric pickups was a costly mistake. Ford poured capital into a halo truck meant to prove that battery power could conquer the heart of the U.S. market, only to discover that the combination of high sticker prices, expensive batteries and uneven demand left its EV division bleeding red ink. Internal projections now show that Ford’s large EV business has struggled badly enough that executives are openly describing the early push as a misallocation of resources rather than a bridge to easy profits.
That reckoning is clearest in Ford’s decision to walk away from its pure battery pickup strategy and shift its emphasis toward more affordable EVs and conventional powered trucks starting in 2029, a change that even Detroit insiders frame as proof that the first wave of “woke” trucks overshot the market. The company has acknowledged that it will redeploy capital away from prestige projects and into segments where customers are actually willing to pay, a shift captured in reporting that details how Ford will shift its emphasis after racking up heavy losses for the full year.
A $19.5 billion reality check
The scale of the financial damage has forced Ford to move beyond incremental course corrections and into outright retreat. The Company is taking a hit of roughly $19.5 billion as it scraps several electric models and refocuses on gasoline and hybrid vehicles, a writedown that reflects not just disappointing sales but a fundamental reassessment of how quickly the truck market will go electric. That charge is being booked as President Donald Trump pulls back federal support for EVs, tightening the squeeze on a business that was already struggling to stand on its own.
Ford will spread out the writedown, taken primarily in the fourth quarter and continuing through next year and into 202, underscoring how long the hangover from the first EV binge will last. Executives have tied the decision directly to a new regulatory and political environment in Washington, where Trump’s policies have reduced incentives and eased pressure on fuel economy rules, leaving Ford to explain to investors why its earlier warnings about an all‑electric future have given way to a more cautious mix of gas, hybrid and lower cost EV offerings, as detailed in analyses of how the Company will scrap several electric models and how Ford will spread out the writedown.
Lightning strikes out: the F‑150 experiment ends
Nothing symbolizes the reversal more than the fate of the F‑150 Lightning. Ford Motor Co built the fully electric 150 Lightning as a technological showcase, ramping up production and marketing it as proof that battery power could handle towing, hauling and everyday commuting in a single package. Instead, mounting losses and falling demand have forced Ford to scrap the fully electric 150 Lightning, a move that concedes the truck’s high cost and real‑world compromises were too much for mainstream buyers even in a strong truck market.
Ford Motor Company has now ceased production of the all‑electric F‑150 Lightning, its flagship full‑size electric pickup, after discovering that early enthusiasm did not translate into sustained sales once the initial wave of orders was filled. Owners complained about range under load and the hassle of charging on long trips, while dealers struggled to move inventory at prices that covered battery and development costs, a dynamic captured in reports that Ford scraps fully electric 150 Lightning and that Ford Motor Company has ceased production of the Lightning.
From 200,000 orders to a demand cliff
On paper, the Lightning looked like a runaway success. Ford increased production of the model to meet an influx of 200,000 orders, a figure that seemed to validate Detroit’s bet that truck buyers would pay a premium for instant torque and quiet cruising. That surge encouraged the company to double down on capacity and marketing, reinforcing the narrative that the transition to electric pickups would be swift and lucrative.
The problem is that those 200,000 early reservations did not translate into a broad, durable market once the most enthusiastic customers were served. Sales have not kept pace with the expanded production footprint, leaving Ford with a mismatch between factory output and real‑world demand that has contributed directly to its multibillion‑dollar writedown and strategic reset. Analysts now point to the Lightning as a textbook case of mistaking initial buzz for long‑term adoption, a misstep laid out in coverage of how Ford increased production to meet 200,000 orders and how Ford killing the F‑150 EV pickup has forced a whopping $19.5 billion writedown.
Trump’s policy shift and the end of easy EV assumptions
Ford’s reversal is not happening in a vacuum. President Donald Trump has reshaped the policy landscape around electric vehicles, pulling support that earlier administrations had used to accelerate adoption and penalize high emissions. With fewer subsidies on the hood and a softer regulatory push on fuel economy, the business case for expensive battery trucks has weakened, especially in segments where buyers are highly price sensitive and already skeptical of new technology.
Executives at Ford have been explicit that the “operating reality has changed,” a phrase that now covers everything from higher borrowing costs to shifting tariffs and a White House that is less interested in forcing rapid electrification. The company is redeploying capital into higher return growth opportunities such as Ford Pro, its commercial and fleet division, and into hybrids that can deliver efficiency gains without the sticker shock of a full EV, a strategy spelled out in statements that the operating reality has changed and capital is moving to Ford Pro and in reporting that Ford takes a 20bn hit as it reverses out of electric vehicles under Donald Trump’s policy regime.
Detroit’s new playbook: hybrids, plug‑ins and cheaper EVs
As the first wave of big battery trucks falters, Detroit is sketching a more pragmatic roadmap. Ford is scrapping a next‑generation electric truck codenamed the T3 and shelving planned electric commercial vans, while at the same time reviving plans for hybrids and plug‑in models that can deliver lower emissions without requiring a complete overhaul of how drivers refuel. The company’s own language now emphasizes “higher return” segments and a more measured pace of electrification, a far cry from the earlier rhetoric that suggested internal combustion was on a short fuse.
Other automakers are making similar adjustments, with Stellantis also backtracking on some EV commitments that were made during the industry’s EV euphoria and Ford canceling a $30,000 US midsize EV truck last year as part of its reset. The common thread is a recognition that mass market buyers will not pay luxury prices for unproven technology, especially when charging infrastructure and resale values remain uncertain, a reality captured in coverage of how Stellantis has also backtracked and Ford canceled a $30,000 US midsize EV truck.
Listening to the “American consumer”
Ford’s leadership insists that the retreat from pure electric pickups is not ideological but empirical. Executives say the “American consumer is speaking clearly,” pointing to slower than expected take‑up of high end EV trucks and persistent strength in gas and hybrid models. Behind the scenes, internal data has shown that many truck buyers are willing to consider electrification, but only if it comes in a package that does not compromise range, towing or price, a combination the first Lightning could not consistently deliver.
Financially, the verdict is stark. Reuters reported that Ford said it expected to lose roughly $5 billion on its EV business this year, about the same as last year, a figure that has forced the company to pull the plug on its pure electric pick‑up truck and rethink its entire product cadence. That loss profile is unsustainable in a market where investors are demanding discipline and where political winds have shifted, a reality laid out in detail in analysis of how Reuters reported that Ford expected to lose roughly $5 billion on its EV business.
Global pressure: BYD, Seagull and the benchmark problem
While Ford wrestles with the fallout from its domestic truck strategy, global competitors are quietly setting a different benchmark. In China, BYD has rolled out low cost EVs like the Seagull that undercut Western rivals on price while still delivering acceptable range and features for urban drivers. Detroit engineers have been spotted benchmarking against the BYD Seagull, a sign that they recognize how far they must go to compete on cost and efficiency rather than on sheer size and horsepower.
The contrast is instructive. Where the Lightning tried to graft a massive battery onto a traditional full‑size truck, the Seagull is built from the ground up as a compact, affordable EV designed for dense cities and shorter commutes. For Detroit, studying BYD is both exciting and a little terrifying, because it highlights how much of the early U.S. EV push was shaped by domestic political narratives rather than by the kind of ruthless cost discipline that dominates in China, a dynamic captured in commentary that Detroit is benchmarking against the BYD Seagull.
The next bet: a $30,000 electric truck
Ford’s answer to this global and domestic pressure is not to abandon electric trucks altogether but to reinvent them at a lower price point. The company is now betting on a $30,000 electric truck to reset its EV strategy, a model that aims to strip out unnecessary complexity and focus on the core capabilities that buyers actually use. Instead of chasing maximum range and luxury features, the new truck is expected to prioritize affordability, basic utility and compatibility with existing charging networks.
Internally, this shift is framed as Ford Scales Back Its Current EV Ambitions Ford, a deliberate move away from splashy announcements and toward a portfolio that can survive in a world of tighter margins and tougher competition. The hope is that a $30,000 truck can appeal to small business owners, tradespeople and budget conscious families who were priced out of the Lightning, while also positioning Ford to compete more directly with lower cost rivals from Asia, a strategy outlined in reporting on how Ford Scales Back Its Current EV Ambitions Ford with a $30,000 electric truck.
Rivals pivot too: Ram, Volkswagen and the EREV path
Ford is not the only truck maker rethinking what “electric” should mean in the pickup segment. Fellow Detroit Big Three truckmaker Ram is preparing to launch its EREV pickup in the first half of 2025, a range‑extended electric vehicle that uses a small engine as a generator to back up the battery. That architecture offers many of the benefits of an EV in daily driving while easing range anxiety for long hauls, a compromise that may resonate with buyers who were wary of going fully electric after watching the Lightning’s struggles.
And Volkswagen, the world’s largest automaker by some measures, is charting its own course by planning to produce a $25,000 pickup that targets value conscious buyers rather than the luxury end of the market. Together, these moves suggest that the next phase of truck electrification will be defined less by ideological battles and more by practical engineering choices that blend batteries, engines and aggressive cost cutting, a trend highlighted in coverage noting that Fellow Detroit Big Three truckmaker Ram will launch its EREV pickup and Volkswagen will produce a $25,000 pickup.
More from MorningOverview