Neuroscientists have long treated dopamine neurons as a fairly unified class of cells, but new work in the olfactory bulb shows that even within this small patch of brain, dopamine comes in two very different flavors. Instead of a single, generic signal, two distinct dopamine neuron types appear to sculpt smell in fundamentally different ways, using opposite wiring strategies to shape how odors are detected and contrasted. Together, they reveal that the brain’s chemistry of smell is more like a carefully tuned mixing desk than a single on–off switch.
By tracing the structure of these neurons and watching how they release neurotransmitters, researchers now argue that the architecture of each dopamine cell type dictates the kind of circuit it builds and the computations it performs. One subtype lacks an axon entirely and works locally, while the other sends long axons across the olfactory bulb, creating a second, more far reaching layer of modulation. The result is a split system in which dopamine can both fine tune individual odor channels and coordinate activity across distant regions.
Two dopamine neuron subtypes hiding in plain sight
The starting point for this story is the realization that dopamine neurons in the olfactory bulb are not all built the same. Earlier work had hinted at diversity, but the latest anatomical and physiological mapping shows that there are Two Distinct Dopamine Neuron Subtypes, one that lacks an axon and one that carries a clear axon, and that these two subclasses process smell in very different ways. The axonless cells release neurotransmitters directly from their dendrites, while the axon bearing cells follow the more familiar pattern of sending signals down a long projection to distant targets, a split that immediately suggests different circuit roles for each population.
In practical terms, that means the olfactory bulb contains a local dopamine system and a long range dopamine system layered on top of each other. The anaxonic neurons sit close to incoming sensory inputs and appear to influence their own electrical activity and that of nearby cells, while the axon bearing neurons behave more like standard projection neurons that can link distant parts of the bulb. The distinction between these two dopamine neuron subtypes, including the fact that One lacks an axon and releases neurotransmitters from dendrites while the other uses a conventional axon, is laid out in detail in work on olfaction dopamine neurons.
How neuron structure shapes smell circuits
Once those two cell types are separated, their wiring tells a clear story about function. The anaxonic dopamine neurons have dendrites that branch within a confined region of the olfactory bulb, and because they lack an axon, their influence is restricted to the immediate neighborhood where they receive input. In contrast, the axon bearing dopamine neurons extend long processes that travel across the bulb, forming connections far from their cell bodies and creating a second tier of modulation that is not tied to a single local circuit. This structural split is not cosmetic, it is the backbone of how these neurons are believed to function in smell processing.
Researchers describe how this distinction in role performed by these different structures, with one class releasing neurotransmitter from dendrites and the other relying almost wholly on the axon, underpins the types of circuits they form for smell processing. The structural analysis shows that the architecture of each dopamine neuron subtype, including the way its dendrites and axon are arranged, directly relates to the kind of olfactory bulb circuit it participates in, a relationship highlighted in work on the structure of dopamine releasing neurons.
Strikingly different release strategies, same transmitter
What makes these findings especially striking is that both neuron types use the same chemical, dopamine, yet they deploy it through very different release strategies. In most textbooks, neurotransmitter release is described as an axon terminal phenomenon, with signals traveling from the cell body down the axon to synapses. The new work shows that in the olfactory bulb, one dopamine subclass breaks that rule, releasing from dendrites instead, while the other adheres to the classic axon based model. This polarity defined split means that the same transmitter can act locally or at a distance, depending on which cell type is active.
At the level of basic neurobiology, this challenges the assumption that axodendritic polarity is a fixed rule for how neurons operate. The detailed experiments, summarized in the Abstract of a study on strikingly different neurotransmitter release strategies, show that neuronal function is intimately tied to axodendritic polarity, yet in these dopaminergic subclasses, that polarity is used in unconventional ways. The dendrite releasing cells are capable of self inhibition and local modulation, while the axon bearing population follows the more standard pattern of sending signals from their axon, underscoring how a single transmitter can support multiple circuit logics.
Local contrast sharpening versus long range coordination
From a sensory perspective, the two dopamine systems appear to divide labor between sharpening local contrast and coordinating activity across the olfactory bulb. The anaxonic neurons, which release from dendrites near incoming sensory fibers, are well positioned to adjust the gain of individual odor channels and to fine tune how sharply one smell stands out from another. By modulating their own activity and that of nearby cells, they can enhance contrast at the very first stage of processing, making subtle differences in odor intensity or composition more detectable.
The axon bearing dopamine neurons, by contrast, send their axons over long distances across the bulb, which allows them to influence regions far from their own input zone. These axons travel long distances across the olfactory bulb rather than influencing their own cell’s electrical activity, and they form synapses that look and behave just like standard neurons, creating a network for broader coordination. This long range wiring, described in work on axon bearing dopamine neurons, suggests that one dopamine system sharpens local odor contrast while the other synchronizes or balances activity across distant glomeruli.
Inside the experiments that revealed the split
To move from anatomical sketches to functional claims, the researchers combined structural tracing, electrophysiology, and targeted stimulation in mice. By labeling dopamine neurons and reconstructing their processes in three dimensions, they could classify cells as anaxonic or axon bearing and map where each type projected. Patch clamp recordings then revealed how each subclass responded to incoming signals and how they released neurotransmitters, confirming that one group relied on dendritic release while the other used axonal terminals. This multi pronged approach allowed the team to link morphology, polarity, and release strategy in the same cells.
The Assessment of this work emphasizes that the study provides evidence for distinct neurotransmitter release modalities between two subclasses of dopaminergic neurons and that these differences translate into different circuit roles within the olfactory bulb. By carefully comparing the two populations, the researchers show that the anaxonic neurons form local circuits that can self inhibit, while the axon bearing neurons participate in longer range pathways, a conclusion grounded in the assessment of dopaminergic subclasses and their contribution to olfactory bulb circuits.
Why anaxonic neurons matter for sensory coding
Anaxonic neurons have often been treated as curiosities, but in the olfactory bulb they emerge as central players in sensory coding. Because they lack an axon, their dendrites serve double duty as both input and output structures, allowing them to integrate sensory information and release dopamine back into the same microcircuit. This arrangement makes them ideal for rapid, local feedback, such as dampening overly strong inputs or boosting weak ones, which can help maintain a stable dynamic range as odor intensity fluctuates. In effect, they act as built in regulators at the front door of the smell system.
The new study is described as the first to show that these two dopaminergic subclasses play fundamentally different roles in the olfactory bulb, and it explicitly notes that the axonless cells are called anaxonic neurons. By demonstrating that these anaxonic neurons are not peripheral oddities but key components of odor processing, the work on neuron structure variations supports the idea that Our findings about structure and polarity can reshape how sensory information processing in mice is understood.
What polarity defined dopamine tells us about brain rules
Stepping back from smell, the discovery that polarity defined dopaminergic subtypes use distinct release strategies raises broader questions about how rigid the classic neuron doctrine really is. If one population can release from dendrites and self inhibit while another relies on axonal output, then axodendritic polarity is not a simple oneway street but a flexible design parameter that circuits can tune. This flexibility may be especially important in sensory systems, where local gain control and long range coordination must coexist without overwhelming each other.
In the Discussion of the reviewed preprint, the authors state that their results show different polarity defined dopaminergic subtypes in the olfactory bulb use distinct neurotransmitter release strategies, and that the dendrite releasing cells are capable of self inhibition while the axon bearing population follows the standard axonal pattern. This framing, presented in the discussion of polarity defined DA subtypes, suggests that what looks like a violation of textbook rules is in fact a deliberate design choice that allows the same transmitter, dopamine, to support both local and distributed computations.
From olfactory bulb to broader dopamine science
For a field that often treats dopamine as a global reward signal, these findings in the olfactory bulb are a reminder that context matters. In this small sensory structure, dopamine is not broadcasting a single message about pleasure or motivation, it is calibrating how odors are encoded and compared. The split between anaxonic and axon bearing neurons shows that even within one transmitter system, the brain can build multiple circuit motifs, each with its own spatial reach and temporal dynamics. That diversity may help explain why dopamine can influence everything from smell and movement to learning and mood without collapsing into a single function.
As more labs apply similar structural and functional analyses to other brain regions, it is likely that additional dopamine subclasses will emerge, each tuned to the demands of its local circuit. The detailed mapping of dopaminergic subclasses in the olfactory bulb, including their morphology, polarity, and release strategies, is already cataloged in the broader study of strikingly different dopaminergic subclasses, and it sets a template for how to dissect other neuromodulatory systems. For now, the message from the nose is clear: even a single chemical like dopamine can be split into multiple circuit roles, and understanding those roles requires looking closely at how each neuron is built and where it sends its signals.
More from MorningOverview