New fossil evidence from Ethiopia is reshaping how I understand the world that produced Lucy, revealing that at least two of her close relatives were already walking on two legs, but doing it in strikingly different ways. Instead of a single, neat path toward human-style bipedalism, the landscape looks more like a crowded experiment in upright walking, with multiple species testing different combinations of ground travel, tree climbing, and diet. These discoveries turn Lucy’s home terrain into a natural laboratory for evolution, where competing strategies for survival played out side by side.
Lucy’s world was never a lonely stage
For decades, Lucy has stood in the public imagination as the emblem of early human walking, a lone pioneer striding across the African savanna. The new fossils from Ethiopia disrupt that tidy picture, showing that Lucy’s species, Australopithecus afarensis, shared its home range with other upright relatives that were just as committed to life on two legs, but not in the same way. Instead of a single blueprint for bipedalism, I now see a mosaic of bodies and behaviors, each tuned to slightly different ecological pressures in the same region.
The emerging portrait from Ethiopia is that Lucy’s kin were not only walking upright but also climbing, feeding, and moving through the landscape in distinct ways that reduced direct competition. One line of evidence points to a cousin that combined a more flexible foot with a strong grip for branches, while another shows Lucy’s own group pushing off with a powerful big toe more like ours. The coexistence of these forms in Ethiopia suggests that early hominins were partitioning the environment, with some favoring open ground and others exploiting trees and mixed habitats, a pattern that helps explain how multiple upright species could thrive together without one immediately outcompeting the rest.
Two cousins, two versions of walking on two legs
The most striking insight from the new research is that Lucy’s relatives were not simply earlier or later versions of the same walking style, but parallel experiments in how to move on two feet. One cousin appears to have walked upright with a gait that still relied heavily on a flexible midfoot and grasping toes, a configuration that would have made tree climbing easier but long-distance ground travel less efficient. Another, closer to Lucy’s own build, shows a more rigid arch and a big toe aligned with the other toes, a setup that favors the kind of heel-to-toe push off that defines modern human walking.
These differences are not minor anatomical quirks, they represent competing solutions to the same basic problem of how to balance speed, stability, and versatility in a changing landscape. In practical terms, one cousin’s gait would have been better suited to scrambling up trunks and navigating branches, while the other’s stride would have excelled on longer ground journeys between food patches or water sources. The fact that both versions of upright walking show up in the same broad Ethiopian setting underscores how evolution often proceeds by branching and overlap rather than by a single, linear march toward a predetermined human form.
The Burtele Foot and the mystery of a second walker
The clearest fossil emblem of this parallel experiment in bipedalism is the so called Burtele Foot, a partial foot that puzzled researchers for years because it did not match Lucy’s anatomy. The Burtele Foot, dated to roughly 3.4 m years ago, preserves a combination of traits that point to a hominin that could walk on two legs but still had a grasping big toe, more like an ape. That single figure, 3.4 m, anchors the fossil in time as a contemporary of Lucy’s species, not a distant ancestor or descendant, which is why it has become such a focal point in debates about early human evolution.
Scientists have now used detailed anatomical study and chemical analysis to argue that the Burtele Foot belonged to a distinct species that lived alongside Australopithecus afarensis rather than being a quirky individual from Lucy’s own group. The structure of the foot suggests a creature that could move bipedally on the ground but was also highly capable in trees, a dual lifestyle that would have allowed it to exploit different food sources and refuge spaces than its more ground oriented cousins. By tying the Burtele Foot to a separate lineage, researchers have effectively confirmed that Lucy’s world included at least one other upright walker with a very different relationship to the forest canopy.
Diet as a clue to coexistence
Walking style is only part of the story, because how these cousins ate also shaped how they could share the same landscape without wiping each other out. Chemical analysis of tooth enamel from fossils associated with the Burtele Foot indicates a diet that leaned heavily on foods found in wooded or mixed environments, such as fruits, leaves, or other plant parts that grow in or near trees. That pattern contrasts with evidence from Lucy’s species, which shows a broader mix of resources that likely included more open country plants and possibly tougher, more fibrous foods.
By comparing these enamel signatures, Scientists have argued that the Burtele Foot hominin and Australopithecus afarensis were partitioning their diets in ways that reduced direct competition, even as they walked upright in the same general region. The Burtele Foot individual, tied to that 3.4 m time frame, appears to have specialized in a more forest linked menu, while Lucy’s group tapped into a wider range of habitats and food types. This dietary divergence, grounded in the chemistry of the teeth, helps explain how two upright species could coexist for extended periods, each occupying its own ecological niche rather than fighting over exactly the same meals.
Lucy’s stride and the modern style of bipedalism
Lucy’s own species, Australopithecus afarensis, has long been recognized as a key step toward the way I walk today, and new comparative work reinforces that view. The anatomy of the foot and leg in Lucy’s group shows a clear commitment to a heel strike followed by a strong push off with the big toe, a pattern that closely resembles the Walking mechanics of modern humans. This kind of gait is efficient for covering ground, especially in more open environments where speed and endurance can mean the difference between reaching food or water and being left behind.
Researchers now emphasize that Lucy and her kin Walked upright with a relatively stiff midfoot and a big toe aligned with the others, features that stabilize the foot during the push off phase of each step. That configuration sacrifices some of the gripping power that a more divergent big toe would provide, but it pays off in smoother, more energy efficient strides on the ground. In other words, Lucy’s version of bipedalism was already leaning toward the long distance walking and running that define our own species, even while some of her cousins held on to a more tree friendly foot.
Tree climbing as a competing survival strategy
While Lucy’s lineage was doubling down on ground based walking, at least one cousin was hedging its bets by keeping a strong foothold in the trees. The Burtele Foot’s grasping big toe and flexible midfoot point to a hominin that could still wrap its toes around branches, climb with confidence, and use the canopy as both a feeding ground and a refuge from predators. This tree friendly anatomy would have been especially valuable in patchy landscapes where wooded areas offered seasonal fruits or leaves that were not easily accessible to more terrestrial walkers.
From a survival standpoint, this mixed strategy of upright walking and agile climbing could buffer a species against environmental swings, allowing it to shift emphasis between ground and canopy as conditions changed. It also meant that this cousin did not have to compete directly with Lucy’s group for the same open country resources, because it could retreat upward when necessary and exploit vertical space in a way that a more rigid foot could not. The coexistence of these two strategies in Ethiopia shows that evolution was not simply rewarding the best ground runner, it was testing how far a lineage could stretch between earth and tree without breaking.
Ethiopia as a crossroads of early human evolution
The geographic setting of these discoveries is as important as the bones themselves, because Ethiopia emerges as a crossroads where multiple hominin experiments overlapped. Fossils from sites in this region show that Lucy, formally known as Australopithecus afarensis, lived in landscapes that ranged from more open areas to patches of woodland and riverine environments. Within that same broad ecological canvas, at least one other upright cousin with a Burtele style foot was navigating a slightly different mix of habitats, leaning more heavily on trees and the foods they provided.
New fossils and contextual data from Ethiopia indicate that these species were not separated by vast distances or radically different climates, but instead were sharing overlapping territories and resources. That proximity makes their anatomical and dietary differences even more significant, because it suggests that small shifts in foot structure, gait, and food preference were enough to carve out distinct ways of life. In this sense, Ethiopia functions as a natural experiment in how closely related species can coexist when they divide up the landscape and its resources with fine grained precision rather than broad, all or nothing splits.
What enamel chemistry reveals about ancient landscapes
One of the most powerful tools for reconstructing these ancient worlds is the chemistry locked inside fossil teeth, which acts like a time capsule of what an individual ate and where it fed. In the case of the Burtele Foot hominin, chemical analysis of enamel samples has shown a pattern consistent with a diet rooted in more wooded or mixed environments, rather than the fully open grasslands that are often associated with later human evolution. Those chemical signatures, tied directly to the 3.4 m age of the fossils, provide independent confirmation that this cousin was living a different ecological life from Lucy’s group even as both walked upright.
By comparing enamel chemistry across multiple individuals and species, Scientists have been able to piece together a more nuanced picture of how early hominins divided up their environment. The Burtele Foot lineage appears to have favored foods that grew in or near trees, while Australopithecus afarensis shows evidence of a broader Diet that Ate from a wider range of plant types and possibly tougher, more open country resources. These subtle but measurable differences in enamel chemistry turn abstract ideas about niche partitioning into concrete, testable claims about who was eating what, and where, in Lucy’s Ethiopia.
Parallel paths and the bigger story of human origins
When I step back from the anatomical details and chemical ratios, what stands out is how these findings complicate any simple story of human origins. Instead of a single line marching from knuckle walking apes to modern humans, the evidence from Ethiopia points to a branching bush of relatives, all experimenting with different blends of upright walking, climbing, and feeding. Lucy’s species, with its efficient heel to toe gait and more generalized diet, represents one of those paths, but the Burtele Foot hominin and other cousins show that alternative strategies were viable for long stretches of time.
New research on these ancient cousins makes it clear that evolution did not have a fixed end point in mind, it was simply testing what worked in the specific conditions of Lucy’s world. Some lineages, like Australopithecus afarensis, pushed further toward the fully terrestrial, long distance walking that would later define our genus. Others, like the Burtele Foot species highlighted in enamel based reconstructions, held on to a more arboreal, tree centered lifestyle. Evidence summarized in reports on how afarensis walked and ate and how two ancient cousins in Ethiopia survived in different ways underscores that our own form of bipedalism is just one successful outcome among several. The fact that only one of those paths ultimately led to us does not make the others failures, it simply reflects the contingent, branching nature of evolution in a world where even Lucy was never truly alone.
More from MorningOverview