Rivian is pulling nearly its entire U.S. fleet of electric delivery vans into the shop after identifying a seat belt defect that could undermine crash protection for drivers. The recall covers roughly 35,000 vehicles built for high‑volume commercial use, a sweeping safety move that tests how a young American EV brand handles a problem at the core of occupant protection.
The issue centers on a driver seat belt component that can wear down when misused, raising the risk that it will not perform as designed in a collision. As Rivian works with federal regulators and fleet customers to repair the defect, the episode highlights both the maturing oversight of electric vehicles and the pressure on startups to prove they can manage safety crises with the same rigor as legacy automakers.
What Rivian is recalling and why it matters
Rivian is recalling nearly 35,000 electric delivery vans in the United States after identifying a fault in the driver seat belt system that could compromise safety in a crash. The affected vehicles are part of a dedicated commercial program, separate from the company’s consumer-focused R1 lineup, and are used heavily in last‑mile delivery where stop‑and‑go driving and frequent exits from the cabin are routine. Regulators have described the problem as a seatbelt issue that can develop over time, not a software glitch or battery defect, which underscores how even basic mechanical components can become critical weak points in high‑duty EV fleets.
Several reports specify that Rivian Automotive is calling back exactly 34,824 electric delivery vehicles, a figure that regulators describe as “nearly 35,000” and that effectively represents the bulk of Rivian’s U.S. commercial van output to date. One detailed account notes that the recall covers model years 2022 through 2025 of the delivery van program, capturing vehicles manufactured across multiple production cycles and reflecting how long the underlying design has been in service before the defect was fully understood. For a young manufacturer still scaling up, having to inspect and repair almost every van it has put into American delivery service is a significant operational and reputational test.
The specific seat belt defect at the center of the recall
At the heart of the recall is the driver seat belt pretensioner, a device that tightens the belt in a crash to hold the occupant firmly in place. According to technical descriptions, Rivian determined that the driver side seat belt pretensioner can be damaged from repeated misuse, particularly in the demanding environment of commercial delivery where drivers may twist, route, or wear the belt incorrectly as they jump in and out of the van. One analysis of the defect explains that the company identified a pattern in which the pretensioner mechanism experiences wear when the belt is not worn as intended, which over time can degrade its ability to function during a collision.
Regulatory filings and follow‑up coverage describe the problem as a Seat Belt Pretensioner Wear‑out concern, a phrase that captures both the mechanical nature of the defect and the behavioral component tied to how drivers actually use the belt. Another report frames the issue as a Seatbelt Damage Risk, emphasizing that the hardware itself can be harmed by repeated misuse rather than failing spontaneously. Together, these accounts make clear that the recall is not about an abstract regulatory technicality but about a tangible risk that the belt may not restrain a driver properly when it is needed most.
How regulators and safety probes pushed the issue
The recall follows a formal safety probe that examined how the seat belt system performed under real‑world conditions in Rivian’s delivery vans. Investigators focused on whether the pretensioner and associated components could withstand the unique duty cycle of commercial EVs, where drivers may make dozens or even hundreds of stops per shift. Reporting on the outcome of that probe notes that Rivian Automotive RIVN agreed to recall 35,000 EVs after regulators concluded that the wear‑related defect could undermine crash performance, even though the company had not reported a pattern of injuries directly tied to the issue.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which oversees vehicle safety in the United States, has described the case as an example of how its defect investigations can lead to broad corrective action before a problem becomes a recurring tragedy. In its summary of the situation, the agency said that NHTSA worked with Rivian Automotive to identify the affected population of nearly 35,000 U.S. vehicles and to define a remedy that would be implemented at no cost to owners or fleet operators. The agency has also reminded drivers and companies that they can search for open recalls and defect investigations through its main portal at NHTSA.gov, a resource that has become increasingly important as EVs introduce new technologies and failure modes into the vehicle fleet.
Which Rivian vehicles are affected, and which are not
The recall is tightly focused on Rivian’s electric delivery vans, not its consumer models, a distinction that matters for both safety and brand perception. Coverage of the campaign makes clear that the R1S SUV and R1T pickup are not part of the recall, even as the company moves to inspect and repair nearly 35,000 commercial EVs in the United States. That separation reflects the fact that the delivery vans use a different interior layout and seat belt configuration tailored to high‑frequency entry and exit, which is precisely where the pretensioner wear issue has emerged.
Several reports describe the affected vehicles simply as vans, while others specify that Rivian is recalling 35,000 vans over a seat belt risk that could encourage drivers to route the belt behind their backs instead of wearing it correctly. Another account notes that Rivian has flagged a seat belt fault and is recalling 34,824 U.S. delivery vans manufactured between 2022 and 2025, reinforcing that the problem is confined to a specific body style and production window. For Rivian’s consumer customers, the message is that their R1S and R1T vehicles are not implicated, while for fleet operators the recall is effectively universal across the company’s U.S. van lineup.
What the risk looks like in real‑world crashes
Seat belt defects are not abstract engineering curiosities; they translate directly into how a driver’s body moves in a crash. In Rivian’s case, the concern is that a worn or damaged pretensioner could fail to cinch the belt properly at the moment of impact, allowing excessive forward motion or even partial ejection from the seat. One detailed account of the defect warns that the issue could lead drivers to route the belt behind their backs, a misuse pattern that both accelerates wear and leaves the torso effectively unrestrained. Another report characterizes the problem as involving defective seat belts that could fail in crashes, language that underscores the stakes for drivers who spend entire workdays behind the wheel.
Regulators have emphasized that, so far, the defect has not been linked to a documented pattern of injuries, but they have also stressed that the absence of past harm does not eliminate future risk. One summary notes that Rivian has called back nearly 35 thousand vans as a precaution after flagging the seat belt fault, a scale that reflects how seriously the company and regulators are treating the potential consequences. For drivers, the practical takeaway is straightforward: until the remedy is completed, they should wear the belt exactly as designed, avoid routing it behind the body, and report any signs of fraying or abnormal operation to fleet managers or service centers immediately.
How Rivian plans to fix the problem
Rivian’s remedy strategy combines hardware inspection with targeted component replacement, a familiar pattern in safety campaigns that involve mechanical wear. The company has told regulators that it will inspect the driver seat belt pretensioner in each affected van and replace parts that show signs of damage or that fall within the suspect production range. One technical summary notes that Rivian has already released an over‑the‑air update related to the issue, a step that can help adjust warning logic or usage prompts but cannot by itself repair a worn mechanical device. The core of the fix remains physical work on the belt system, carried out at service centers or mobile repair sites.
Under federal law, Manufacturers are required to fix safety defects by repairing the problem, replacing the part, offering a refund, or in rare cases repurchasing the vehicle, and Rivian’s plan fits squarely within that framework. The company’s own support materials explain that owners whose vehicles are involved in a recall will be contacted with instructions on How and Where to get the work done, and that the repairs will be performed at no cost. For large fleet customers, Rivian is expected to coordinate scheduling to minimize downtime, a logistical challenge when tens of thousands of vans may need service in a relatively compressed window.
What fleet operators and drivers should do now
For the companies that operate Rivian’s delivery vans, the immediate priority is to identify which vehicles are covered by the recall and to schedule repairs as soon as possible. Regulators advise that fleet managers can use the federal recall lookup tools by entering each vehicle’s identification number, or VIN, to see whether an open campaign applies. The main recall portal explains that drivers and operators can go to the dedicated Recalls page, enter the VIN, and confirm whether a safety repair is outstanding, after which the vehicle can be taken to a local dealership or service center to be repaired for free.
In parallel, drivers should be briefed on proper belt use and on the specific misuse patterns that can accelerate pretensioner wear. One analysis of the defect notes that routing the belt behind the back is a particular concern, both because it undermines protection and because it can damage the mechanism over time. Fleet safety teams can reinforce that the belt must be worn across the chest and lap as designed, and that any difficulty latching, retracting, or adjusting the belt should be reported immediately. For operators who also manage child transport or family vehicles, child safety advocates recommend that they Find Out if Your Car Seat is Recalled Visit the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, underscoring that seat belt and restraint recalls can affect multiple parts of a transportation operation, not just the driver’s seat in a delivery van.
How to check any vehicle for open recalls
Rivian’s campaign is a reminder that every driver, whether in an EV or a gasoline car, should periodically check for open safety recalls. The federal recall system allows anyone to search by VIN to see if a vehicle, tire, or piece of equipment has an unresolved defect notice. The main recall search page explains that owners can use the recall lookup to confirm whether a manufacturer has identified a safety problem and is obligated to repair it, replace the part, or offer another remedy at no cost.
For drivers who prefer a more general overview of safety resources, the agency’s vehicle safety hub walks through how to use a VIN to check Your vehicle’s status and to understand what to expect from the repair process. For Rivian owners specifically, the company’s recall information page answers common questions like “How do I know if my vehicle has a recall?” and “Where do I go to get it fixed?”, reinforcing that the process is designed to be straightforward and free of charge. In an era when over‑the‑air updates can address some issues silently, the Rivian seat belt campaign is a clear example of a defect that still requires old‑fashioned mechanical work, and of why regular recall checks remain essential.
What this means for Rivian’s reputation and the broader EV market
For Rivian, the recall is a high‑stakes test of credibility at a moment when the company is still building its identity as a reliable American EV manufacturer. One report describes the company as an American EV startup that is recalling nearly 35,000 delivery vehicles, a scale that could rattle investors and customers if not handled transparently. Another analysis notes that Rivian Recalls 35,000 Vans Over Seat Belt Risk as Rivian Automotive, listed on NASDAQ, tries to reassure customers in a tightly competitive EV market. The company’s willingness to recall almost every U.S. delivery van it has built can be read as a sign that it is taking safety seriously, but it also highlights how a single design issue can ripple across a young product line.
For the broader EV sector, the Rivian campaign underscores that electric vehicles are subject to the same kinds of mechanical defects as traditional cars, in addition to the software and battery issues that often dominate headlines. Reports that Rivian Automotive RIVN is recalling 35,000 EVs after a safety probe, and that it is pulling back 34,000 electric delivery vans over a seat belt issue, show that regulators and manufacturers are treating EV safety with the same rigor applied to internal‑combustion vehicles. As more electric vans, trucks, and SUVs enter service, the industry will face continued scrutiny not only of batteries and software but of fundamentals like seat belts, airbags, and structural integrity. How Rivian navigates this recall, communicates with customers, and prevents similar issues in future designs will help shape perceptions of whether new‑generation automakers can match or exceed the safety culture of their older rivals.
More from MorningOverview