Only a handful of big three-row SUVs have cleared the toughest crash tests and earned the highest safety award available, and they are not wearing Ford or Chevrolet badges. For families who equate size with security, the latest data show that only a very select group of large SUVs actually meets the most demanding criteria for protecting people inside and outside the vehicle.
I want to unpack which models made the cut, why so many popular nameplates fell short, and what this means if you are shopping for a full-size family hauler that can genuinely back up its tough image with top-tier crash performance.
How the safety bar for large SUVs got so high
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has steadily tightened its standards, and the Top Safety Pick+ label now reflects a far more punishing set of tests than many shoppers realize. To earn the top award, a large SUV has to perform well not only in traditional frontal and side crashes but also in updated evaluations that scrutinize rear-seat protection, nighttime pedestrian detection, and the consistency of its crash-avoidance tech across trims, as shown in the institute’s own list of large SUV ratings.
That rising bar is why the current roster of winners is so short, and why it excludes some of the most familiar full-size models on American roads. As I compare the latest crash-test data with consumer expectations, the gap between perceived safety and verified performance becomes clear, and it sets the stage for why only a few large SUVs now qualify for the highest award.
The four big SUVs that actually earned the top award
When I drill into the most recent Top Safety Pick+ results for this segment, only four large SUVs emerge with the highest rating, a finding echoed in coverage that highlights that just four large SUVs have cleared the bar for the current model year. That tiny group underscores how rare it is for a three-row, body-on-frame or near-full-size vehicle to combine crash structure, restraint systems, and advanced driver assistance in a way that satisfies the latest criteria.
Reporting that focuses specifically on this segment reinforces the point that only a select few large SUVs have been rated at the very top, with analysis of the institute’s data pointing to just a narrow slice of the market as true standouts among big family haulers, as reflected in a breakdown of only large SUVs rated at the top. For shoppers, that means the badge on the grille is far less important than whether the underlying engineering and safety tech have been validated in these independent tests.
Why Ford and Chevy are missing from the top tier
The absence of Ford and Chevrolet from the latest Top Safety Pick+ list for large SUVs is striking, given how dominant models like the Expedition, Suburban, and Tahoe are in sales and visibility. When I compare their results with the institute’s criteria, it becomes clear that specific shortfalls in areas like updated side-impact performance, rear-occupant protection, or pedestrian crash avoidance can keep these high-volume vehicles from reaching the top rung, even if they perform adequately in older or less stringent tests.
Industry commentary on the current safety landscape for big SUVs notes that not all full-size models are engineered to the same standard, and that some of the most familiar nameplates lag behind newer or more safety-focused rivals in key metrics, a point underscored in an analysis arguing that not all large SUVs are created equal when it comes to safety. For Ford and Chevy, the message is that brand loyalty and sheer size are no substitute for the specific crash-test and active-safety benchmarks that now define the Top Safety Pick+ threshold.
What the tests actually measure for families in the third row
For parents cross-shopping big SUVs, the most consequential changes in recent testing focus on what happens to people who are not in the front seats. The updated moderate-overlap and side-impact evaluations pay close attention to how well the second and third rows protect occupants from head, chest, and leg injuries, and whether seatbelts and airbags work together to prevent submarining or head contact with hard surfaces, as detailed in the institute’s expanded large SUV test protocols.
These changes matter because large SUVs are often packed with kids, grandparents, and car seats, and the old assumption that the sheer mass of a big vehicle guarantees safety no longer holds up under this more granular scrutiny. When I look at which models earned the top award, they tend to pair strong crash structures with carefully tuned restraints and advanced driver assistance that can spot pedestrians and cyclists at night, a combination that separates them from rivals that still rely on older engineering or less capable sensors.
The data problem: how shoppers sort signal from noise
One of the biggest challenges for buyers is simply finding and interpreting the right safety information amid a flood of marketing claims and fragmented data. The institute’s ratings are public, but they sit alongside government crash scores, automaker brochures, and dealer talking points, and the result can feel like an overwhelming digital archive of sometimes conflicting signals, not unlike navigating a sprawling collection of historical documents such as the curated materials in a federal special collections archive.
In practice, that means shoppers often default to brand familiarity or anecdote instead of digging into the specific crash-test outcomes that separate a Top Safety Pick+ SUV from one that merely looks imposing. I find that the most effective approach is to start with the institute’s list of current large-SUV winners, then cross-check those names against other trusted sources, rather than trying to reconcile every stray data point that surfaces in a search or a dealership pitch.
How dealers and automakers frame safety in the showroom
On the retail side, safety has become a central part of the sales conversation, but the way it is framed can vary widely from store to store. Some dealers lean heavily on brand reputation and a handful of talking points about airbags or driver-assistance features, while others are more disciplined about walking customers through independent ratings and explaining why a particular large SUV did or did not earn the top award, a dynamic that mirrors broader discussions in dealer-focused newsletters about how to present complex topics like safety differentiation without overwhelming buyers.
Automakers, for their part, often highlight any five-star government scores or partial wins in specific tests, even when their vehicles fall short of the Top Safety Pick+ bar. As I compare their marketing language with the underlying crash data, the contrast reinforces why independent, test-based awards matter so much in this segment, and why the small group of large SUVs that actually earn the top rating stand out in a marketplace saturated with safety-themed slogans.
Digital literacy, data overload, and the safety conversation
The struggle to make sense of safety ratings for large SUVs is part of a broader challenge of digital literacy that extends far beyond the car market. Researchers have long warned that as more information moves online, people need better tools and habits to distinguish between authoritative data and persuasive noise, a theme explored in depth in analyses of how digital records and algorithms shape what we see, such as the examination of data trails in Blown to Bits.
When I watch how shoppers research big SUVs, I see the same patterns: multiple tabs open, a mix of official ratings, influencer videos, and forum anecdotes, and a tendency to latch onto the most emotionally resonant story rather than the most rigorous test. That is why I keep coming back to the value of structured, independent evaluations like the Top Safety Pick+ program, which, unlike a generic product page or a slick promotional site such as a streaming or download portal, is built around transparent criteria and repeatable methods instead of engagement metrics.
What mentors, educators, and even kids can teach us about reading safety data
There is also a human side to how we interpret safety information, and it often starts with how we learn to evaluate expertise and evidence in other parts of life. Work on mentoring and reflective practice in education, for example, emphasizes the importance of guiding people to ask better questions and to probe the assumptions behind any claim, a mindset that translates directly to how a buyer might interrogate a salesperson’s pitch versus an independent crash-test chart, as discussed in resources on mentoring and critical reflection.
Even in vocational and technical training, where the focus might be on hands-on skills, there is growing recognition that learners need to navigate documentation, standards, and safety protocols with the same care they bring to tools and machinery, a point underscored in teaching materials that stress reading and applying formal guidelines, such as a competency-based training module used in professional education. When families bring that kind of disciplined, question-driven approach to vehicle shopping, they are far more likely to notice which large SUVs truly meet the highest safety benchmarks and which simply trade on size and familiarity.
Turning complex ratings into practical choices
Ultimately, the fact that only four large SUVs have earned the top safety award for the current model year is both a warning and an opportunity. It is a warning because it shows that many of the biggest, most visible family vehicles on the road are not yet engineered to the latest standard for protecting everyone inside and outside the cabin, and an opportunity because the small group of winners gives shoppers a clear starting point if safety is their top priority, as highlighted in focused rundowns of which large SUVs are rated at the top.
To make those ratings actionable, I find it helpful to think the way a coder or game designer might, breaking a complex system into discrete rules and outcomes. Interactive tools and educational projects, such as a visual programming environment that lets users build and test their own logic like the one showcased in a Snap! project, offer a useful metaphor: once you understand the rules, you can see why certain inputs produce better results. In the same way, once you grasp how the Top Safety Pick+ criteria work, it becomes much easier to see why only a few large SUVs reach the top tier and why Ford and Chevy, despite their size and sales, are not yet on that very short list.
More from MorningOverview